The Bridge
January 15th 2008 05:21
I missed seeing this extraordinary documentary at last year’s Sydney Film Festival, so recently I caught up with The Bridge (2006) on DVD. Curiously it reminded me of another provocative and disturbing doco I did see during the Festival; Zoo (2007).
Like Zoo, The Bridge, is a deeply compelling film about a deeply disturbing subject made with intelligence and a delicate sense of style. Haunting and poetic, The Bridge resonated with me for along time after, just as Zoo had done. Whereas Zoo was about aberrant love (bestiality), The Bridge is about nihilistic despair (suicide), two films exploring the darkness of the human condition.
The Bridge was conceived and directed by Eric Steel, who had read about how the Golden Gate bridge in San Francisco was the most popular destination in the world for those committed to suicide. He pondered over how something so iconic and majestic could become linked to something so utterly sad.
In 2004 Steel bought $100,000 worth of camera equipment, surreptitiously hired several crew members through discrete newspaper ads, and set up camp in the surrounds of the Golden Gate. For one whole year his crew filmed the bridge using state of the art digital cameras from every conceivable angle, capturing the bridge like it was a massive steel beast being shot for National Geographic.
In reality they filmed nearly all of the 24 people who committed suicide from the bridge that year; some in close-up, others in long shot. Some were simply a splash in the distance, while others were long lingering moments of a person contemplating, and then casually scaling the bridge’s modest barrier, throwing themselves off, and plummeting the roughly 67 metres into the sea.
As you can imagine, after its release the doco garnered a lot of criticism from the moral majority. How can someone make a film depicting people actually committing suicide and not intervene?! The cynics could argue that, like shooting animals killing for food, it is part of life and death’s inevitable, and director Steel was simply holding a mirror up to society. But suicide is not natural, would come the response, it’s immoral, and illegal to boot.
Suicide is a worldwide disease. The Bridge, disturbing as it is, is also an eye-opening film that demanded to be made, except no one has been brave enough to make it until now. I applaud Eric Steel for his tenacity and boldness. Yes, the movie can be viewed in one light as being exploitative, but in a way the doco simply highlights in similar fashion the selfishness and single mindedness of the person committing suicide. If a person is determined to commit suicide, they will do it, and no one will be able to stop them.
The film uses interviews with family, close friends, and strangers, to some of the people who committed suicide that year. These on-camera interviews are intercut with footage of their loved ones completing the act. It is these interviews that provide the documentary with an intriguing insight into the lives of those who’ve committed suicide in those final days, hours and even minutes before.
Curiously, and in an important juxtaposition, one of those interviewed is a young man who survived trying to kill himself. He explains how he was diagnosed bi-polar as an adolescent and how his father was cruel and tyrannical. The father interviewed seems a different man to the one described, but then this is post several suicide attempts. The boy changed his mind after jumping (as I can imagine many might) and managed to adjust his position mid-fall so that he hit the water feet first. With strong boots on, and probably just the right angle, he plunged about forty feet deep, shattering several bones which pierced organs, but not the heart. A seal kept him afloat by bobbing around him (in a twist of blackly comic irony the boy thought the seal was a shark, and concluded that God had decided rather than dieing from the jump he’d be eaten by a shark).
Although dealing with an extremely serious subject the film is surrounded by an ethereal vibe; that of the haunting score and the beautiful imagery of the Golden Gate itself, often obscured by cloud, frequently portrayed through time-lapse photography, the tiny vehicles hurtling along its enormous span like busy ants, while container ships pass underneath alongside surfers catching the waves from its wake. Cleverly, yet frankly, director Steel juxtaposes all this life and energy with the macabre finality of suicide.
Just as Zoo is a documentary for those with open minds, The Bridge is not for all tastes; a portrait of sociological horror that will touch a raw nerve with some, yet provides undeniable insight into a realm often neglected by mainstream documentary filmmaking.
Like Zoo, The Bridge, is a deeply compelling film about a deeply disturbing subject made with intelligence and a delicate sense of style. Haunting and poetic, The Bridge resonated with me for along time after, just as Zoo had done. Whereas Zoo was about aberrant love (bestiality), The Bridge is about nihilistic despair (suicide), two films exploring the darkness of the human condition.
The Bridge was conceived and directed by Eric Steel, who had read about how the Golden Gate bridge in San Francisco was the most popular destination in the world for those committed to suicide. He pondered over how something so iconic and majestic could become linked to something so utterly sad.
In 2004 Steel bought $100,000 worth of camera equipment, surreptitiously hired several crew members through discrete newspaper ads, and set up camp in the surrounds of the Golden Gate. For one whole year his crew filmed the bridge using state of the art digital cameras from every conceivable angle, capturing the bridge like it was a massive steel beast being shot for National Geographic.
In reality they filmed nearly all of the 24 people who committed suicide from the bridge that year; some in close-up, others in long shot. Some were simply a splash in the distance, while others were long lingering moments of a person contemplating, and then casually scaling the bridge’s modest barrier, throwing themselves off, and plummeting the roughly 67 metres into the sea.
As you can imagine, after its release the doco garnered a lot of criticism from the moral majority. How can someone make a film depicting people actually committing suicide and not intervene?! The cynics could argue that, like shooting animals killing for food, it is part of life and death’s inevitable, and director Steel was simply holding a mirror up to society. But suicide is not natural, would come the response, it’s immoral, and illegal to boot.
Suicide is a worldwide disease. The Bridge, disturbing as it is, is also an eye-opening film that demanded to be made, except no one has been brave enough to make it until now. I applaud Eric Steel for his tenacity and boldness. Yes, the movie can be viewed in one light as being exploitative, but in a way the doco simply highlights in similar fashion the selfishness and single mindedness of the person committing suicide. If a person is determined to commit suicide, they will do it, and no one will be able to stop them.
The film uses interviews with family, close friends, and strangers, to some of the people who committed suicide that year. These on-camera interviews are intercut with footage of their loved ones completing the act. It is these interviews that provide the documentary with an intriguing insight into the lives of those who’ve committed suicide in those final days, hours and even minutes before.
Curiously, and in an important juxtaposition, one of those interviewed is a young man who survived trying to kill himself. He explains how he was diagnosed bi-polar as an adolescent and how his father was cruel and tyrannical. The father interviewed seems a different man to the one described, but then this is post several suicide attempts. The boy changed his mind after jumping (as I can imagine many might) and managed to adjust his position mid-fall so that he hit the water feet first. With strong boots on, and probably just the right angle, he plunged about forty feet deep, shattering several bones which pierced organs, but not the heart. A seal kept him afloat by bobbing around him (in a twist of blackly comic irony the boy thought the seal was a shark, and concluded that God had decided rather than dieing from the jump he’d be eaten by a shark).
Although dealing with an extremely serious subject the film is surrounded by an ethereal vibe; that of the haunting score and the beautiful imagery of the Golden Gate itself, often obscured by cloud, frequently portrayed through time-lapse photography, the tiny vehicles hurtling along its enormous span like busy ants, while container ships pass underneath alongside surfers catching the waves from its wake. Cleverly, yet frankly, director Steel juxtaposes all this life and energy with the macabre finality of suicide.
Just as Zoo is a documentary for those with open minds, The Bridge is not for all tastes; a portrait of sociological horror that will touch a raw nerve with some, yet provides undeniable insight into a realm often neglected by mainstream documentary filmmaking.
| 120 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog



























Comment by JohnDoe
Film & TV on DVD
Comment by Tracy
Movies and Life
Comment by Cibbuano
20/20 Filmsight
Science News
Hunt Famous
Orble Post of the Day
Fat Cult
Techbreak
that guy fell 67m, feet first, with boots on, and it still shattered his bones? Man, water is hard.
Comment by Lilla
Enviro Warrior
An Extra Ordinary Life
Dream Herald
I loved your review and also applaud the filmakers boldness
It seems to me, that those drawn to suicide will be drawn, no matter what is on the screen... my point is that it wouldn't give the non-suicidal ideas, would it? So the moralists are off base to me. Anyway, that is just my view.
I will relish finding this film in my video store, now that I have read your review.
Thanks
Lilla ...
Comment by Louie
Climate Forum
Climate Red
randomthoughts
Phil's Wellness Tips
Each to their own I guess but I can see why it would upset people.
cheers
Louie
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Cibby, water from certain height is like hitting concrete. Ugh! Imagine your worst belly flop x 100 ...
Louie, by the looks of it the filmmakers were too far from the bridge to ever intervene in time, but yeah, it begs the question ...
Comment by Damo
For the Sake of Argument
My Apologetics
It depends on how it was handled.
Usually stories of suicide are not put to news because of the copycat effect. Random reports of suicides tend to increase suicide rates it has been claimed.
Yet handled correctly may lower suicide rates. For instance if it identifies the signs of mental illness, or it leads to the improvement of services like lifelines and family support.
So it is a difficult subject.
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
I have been at that point, that emotionless solitary void, and I plunged, although my choice was chemically, and it very nearly worked, having survived a week long coma.
Because of this fact, I need to respond to your statement:
"Yes, the movie can be viewed in one light as being exploitative, but in a way the doco simply highlights in similar fashion the selfishness and single mindedness of the person committing suicide."
Firstly, I think the decision on whether something is exploitative depends on the reasoning behind the film maker's choice to cover a particular topic, for instance; is it to enlighten, to show the true human condition, hidden under the acceptable veneer, of a society? Or is it merely sensationalist, with no philosophical view, appealing to one's Schadenfreude?
Secondly, while I agree the ultimate action of self sacrifice may seem selfish to that person's family and friends, I disagree that it is purely a selfish act, for that implies logical decision making and reasoning, which the (serious) suicide victim is unable to mentally cogitate.
This I can attest to from my personal experience.
For it is not an action I came to as a punishment of others, nor did I manage to think of what affect it might have on those that may have cared for me. I entered a solitary dark place, which took three days to generate, bringing me to a mental space where all else ceased to exist, and in my thought processes at the time, there seemed only one solution, suicide.
But, people attempt suicide for many different reasons, no doubt, and most seem to be not wanting to die, but get people’s attention, either for help, or they have another type of needy personality disorder, and then, some commit self murder, but that is another matter.
By the way, I liked your general approach in your review; you create a quiet and sombre mood, befitting the subject. I am unsure when, or whether, I might attempt to watch the doco myself, however, I think it is an extremely important subject that needs attention.
Cheers
fog
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
thankyou for that honest perspective, and I agree with you. The Bridge is not sensationalist, far from it, yet it enlightens in a surprising way, revealing more about the people who knew the person who had committed suicide. There is a distinct sense of distance apparent between the family/friends and the victims they knew, which runs parallel with the distance created by the lens from the suicide subjects on the bridge itself.
Thankyou for acknowledging the stylistic I employed in writing the review also.
Comment by Miswanderlust
Killer Beats
Ramble On
Hipnotherapy
Mis
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile