Splice
July 7th 2010 01:34
Director Vincenzo Natali made the low-budget Cube (1997), a claustrophobic sf-thriller that was all premise and tedious as hell, yet has a small cult following. Natali was a storyboard artist for many years - worked on Ginger Snaps (2000) - until moving into directing, and Splice (2010) is his most ambitious project yet realised; a far-fetched, uneven, and rather irritating amalgam of science fiction, relationship drama, and shades of body horror a la David Cronenberg (whom I would’ve much preferred to have been in the director’s chair).
Elsa (Sarah Polley) and Clive (Adrian Brody), two maverick scientists, defy legal and ethical boundaries and forge ahead with a dangerous genetic experiment: splicing together human and animal DNA to create a new organism. The creature rapidly develops from a deformed female rodent-like infant into an elegant but dangerous winged human-chimera whom they name Dren (Delphine Chanéac), and a strange bond forms with each of her creators.
The premise is neat, and there are good actors on board; but I didn’t once believe either Polley or Brody as scientists (Brody was constantly upstaged by his t-shirts), and wasn’t convinced by their performances. However it’s the direction and screenplay I had the most problem with. It was predictable for much of the narrative, and the over-played direction reminded me of the kind of flossy, obvious storytelling techniques employed by French director Luc Besson. What a surprise then that Splice is a French/Canadian/American co-production; it feels it. There’s a flighty European sensibility that seizes hold of the narrative whisking it around like some kind of perverse romance (which it toys sexually with in the movie’s most audacious – and simultaneously risible – sequence), when it should be anchored in gripping drama.
I went into the screening wanting to like Splice (Guillermo Del Toro is one of the producers), but the writing was on the wall (er, screen) right from the start with the movie’s over-long and over-art-directed credit sequence (for me that’s never a good sign). The entire movie frustrated and annoyed me in equal measure. I realise its not a straight horror movie, and attempts to marry science fiction with contemporary advancements, yet with an edge of potential nightmare (which eventually becomes full-blown), but it was cute and (unintentially) comedic at moments that felt utterly incongruous with the tone that had proceeded these scenes. Essentially the story is that of The Modern Prometheus (AKA Frankenstein), and the characters of Elsa and Clive are lifted from the original two 1930s Hollywood movies. But there’s the carnal predatory nature of Species (1995) in there too.
The idea of inter-special intercourse and reproduction is not new in the sf literature realm, but it hasn’t been handled that often in sf cinema, probably because producers fear the revulsion factor would be too strong. The movie that deals with this kind of dangerous coital dabbling with no-holds-barred and with extraordinary results is the brilliant, but difficult, Possession (1981). Another - albeit never actually made - is the screenplay to The Tourist, one of the most famous unproduced screenplays to have floated around Hollywood.
The special effects work from the ubiquitous KNB EFX Group through the movie is good, but nothing amazing. By the movie’s last quarter the tone seems to settle in, but its all too late. The nightmare has been fully unleashed, the sexual charge is taking control, the gender-bender element has taken over, the plight of Elsa, Clive and their creation, Dren, is up in the air. But, despite some tense moments, and an ending that cries like a baby, “Seeeeequeeeeel!” Splice failed to be the instant cult classic it badly wants to be. The disturbing news is director Natali is set to direct one of my favourite sf novels, Neuromancer by William Gibson. I had clung to the thin hope this book (of which all the good ideas have been plundered already) would be directed by Martin Scorsese finally making a sf movie, but I would’ve been happy to see David Fincher at the helm.
Here’s the trailer:
Elsa (Sarah Polley) and Clive (Adrian Brody), two maverick scientists, defy legal and ethical boundaries and forge ahead with a dangerous genetic experiment: splicing together human and animal DNA to create a new organism. The creature rapidly develops from a deformed female rodent-like infant into an elegant but dangerous winged human-chimera whom they name Dren (Delphine Chanéac), and a strange bond forms with each of her creators.
The premise is neat, and there are good actors on board; but I didn’t once believe either Polley or Brody as scientists (Brody was constantly upstaged by his t-shirts), and wasn’t convinced by their performances. However it’s the direction and screenplay I had the most problem with. It was predictable for much of the narrative, and the over-played direction reminded me of the kind of flossy, obvious storytelling techniques employed by French director Luc Besson. What a surprise then that Splice is a French/Canadian/American co-production; it feels it. There’s a flighty European sensibility that seizes hold of the narrative whisking it around like some kind of perverse romance (which it toys sexually with in the movie’s most audacious – and simultaneously risible – sequence), when it should be anchored in gripping drama.
I went into the screening wanting to like Splice (Guillermo Del Toro is one of the producers), but the writing was on the wall (er, screen) right from the start with the movie’s over-long and over-art-directed credit sequence (for me that’s never a good sign). The entire movie frustrated and annoyed me in equal measure. I realise its not a straight horror movie, and attempts to marry science fiction with contemporary advancements, yet with an edge of potential nightmare (which eventually becomes full-blown), but it was cute and (unintentially) comedic at moments that felt utterly incongruous with the tone that had proceeded these scenes. Essentially the story is that of The Modern Prometheus (AKA Frankenstein), and the characters of Elsa and Clive are lifted from the original two 1930s Hollywood movies. But there’s the carnal predatory nature of Species (1995) in there too.
The idea of inter-special intercourse and reproduction is not new in the sf literature realm, but it hasn’t been handled that often in sf cinema, probably because producers fear the revulsion factor would be too strong. The movie that deals with this kind of dangerous coital dabbling with no-holds-barred and with extraordinary results is the brilliant, but difficult, Possession (1981). Another - albeit never actually made - is the screenplay to The Tourist, one of the most famous unproduced screenplays to have floated around Hollywood.
The special effects work from the ubiquitous KNB EFX Group through the movie is good, but nothing amazing. By the movie’s last quarter the tone seems to settle in, but its all too late. The nightmare has been fully unleashed, the sexual charge is taking control, the gender-bender element has taken over, the plight of Elsa, Clive and their creation, Dren, is up in the air. But, despite some tense moments, and an ending that cries like a baby, “Seeeeequeeeeel!” Splice failed to be the instant cult classic it badly wants to be. The disturbing news is director Natali is set to direct one of my favourite sf novels, Neuromancer by William Gibson. I had clung to the thin hope this book (of which all the good ideas have been plundered already) would be directed by Martin Scorsese finally making a sf movie, but I would’ve been happy to see David Fincher at the helm.
Here’s the trailer:
| 186 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog






























Comment by Deni
Abstract Magick
Cinema Herald
Great review and I couldn't agree with you more.
I have a review sitting in my draft folder collecting dust (it's been there for weeks), waiting and most likely it will never see the light of day.
This movie was so convoluted that I didn't even know where to start. I have no idea what it was trying to be or the message it was going for and the ending was such a mess of disappointment.
I just might hit delete after all - it's only a paragraph.
Comment by Catherine Stebbins
Cinema Enthusiast
Thoughts from a Cinephile
Thoughts from a TV Watcher
Comment by ShaunK
Screen Adventure
Comment by Deni
Abstract Magick
Cinema Herald
Comment by JohnDoe
Film & TV on DVD
I still hold out hope for this one despite its surface similarities to Species, mainly because I am a fan of the Director.
Cube is undoubtedly his low budget gem that instead of tedium actually riveted me to every frame. Cypher was a definite step down but still an enjoyable mind game.
I think his intellectual style will be suited to Neuromancer but only time will tell.
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Shaun, I rest my case.
Deni, actually I didn't mind the very end, but I saw it coming, only in an alternate way.
JD, if he adds any of the uneven "Luc Besson" style tone in Neuromancer, I'll be seeking blood!
Comment by Deni
Abstract Magick
Cinema Herald
Comment by David O'Connell
Screen Fanatic
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
David, performances are paramount for me, if I don't believe 'em, the movie pretty much goes out the door.
Comment by Natalina
My Life My Muse
Beta Girl Blog
There were a FEW things I liked about this movie, and for lack of a better term... I enjoyed the "prettiness" of it. The lovely Dren, the night sky and the woods... these were pleasing to my eyeballs. Beyond that... blah. And I get so tired of Adrian Brody's "Too cool for school" thing. He comes off the same in most of his movies as he does in interviews. Especially in this one. Clearly they allowed him to determine his own wardrobe. He just wears me out.
By the by, I actually thought they were going to take this film in a demented and different direction. I thought Sarah Polly's character was going to be taken in a wickedly different path after she takes the cat away and then with the operating table scene in the barn. I think they missed an opportunity there to turn the tables. Ala "who's the real monster"... see what I mean? Oh well. Maybe that's why I don't make movies
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile