Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
July 16th 2009 03:15
I’m in a slightly cynical and impatient mood. So here are my succinct two-cents on the sixth installment of the adventures of Harry Potter, orphan, wizard student extraordinaire, The Chosen One ... Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)
The opening sequence which follows the trail of three Death Eaters as they spiral down out of the clouds and hurtles toward the narrow streets of London, then careers at breakneck speed dodging double-decker buses and buildings before streaking down the narrow cobblestone street of Diagon Alley and finally exploding into the side of an antique store, is brilliant, and worth the extra ticket price to see it in IMAX 3D. It’s a pity the whole movie isn’t in 3D. It’s kind of ridiculous having the first 12 minutes in 3D and then you have to watch the remaining two-a-quarter hours in standard 2D.
The movie is overlong. Because ostensibly the plotting is a set-up for the double-whammy finale that will be Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 (2010) and Part 2 (2011) there isn’t as much action, instead relying on deepening the characterization of its key characters, both good and bad. But mostly it seems to want to play the burgeoning romantic intrigue angle, which is frightfully tedious. More action, less conversation, better be the rule of thumb for the final two movies.
The best sequence, apart from the stunning opening, is when Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) joins Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) in a cave searching for a part of Voldemort’s soul called a Horcrux embedded in a locket that belonged to Salazar Slytherin. It is here that a truly nightmarish scene – and arguably the darkest, most menacing scene in the series so far – unfolds where Harry is besieged by skeletal ghoul demons called Inferi that emerge from the dark watery depths and pull Harry under. It was like something from my own nightmares! Dumbledore comes to a fiery rescue despite being a little worse for wear having drunk more than enough of the poisonous potion where the locket was hidden in.
The Death Eater’s siege on The Burrow is a good scene, with Harry running through the long grass, the sound of Fenrir (Dave Legeno) and Bellatrix (Helena Bonham Carter) all around him, it was tense and odious. Another good scene has Katie (Georgina Leonidas), a young female colleague of Harry’s become momentarily possessed by a curse meant for Dumbledore, and she’s seemingly strung up in mid-air, mouth agape, eyes wide in terror, then hurled back down onto the snow. Creepy stuff!
I’ve not read any of the novels, and I have no intention of reading them. Not my bag o’ bones. I was entertained by The Order of the Phoenix (2008), and I was beguiled enough by Half-Blood Prince. The movies are very well made for what they are. The fans should be thankful they’ve had some high calibre filmmakers delivering the movie adaptations. So many novels’ series fall flat after the first installment. The Harry Potter series gets progressively more and more ominous, which tickles my dark fancy. I’d love for the last two movies to be rated MA, but that is asking a little too much of young Harry methinks.
Oh, and Hagrid’s pet spider. Ugh.
Here's the trailer:
The opening sequence which follows the trail of three Death Eaters as they spiral down out of the clouds and hurtles toward the narrow streets of London, then careers at breakneck speed dodging double-decker buses and buildings before streaking down the narrow cobblestone street of Diagon Alley and finally exploding into the side of an antique store, is brilliant, and worth the extra ticket price to see it in IMAX 3D. It’s a pity the whole movie isn’t in 3D. It’s kind of ridiculous having the first 12 minutes in 3D and then you have to watch the remaining two-a-quarter hours in standard 2D.
The movie is overlong. Because ostensibly the plotting is a set-up for the double-whammy finale that will be Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 (2010) and Part 2 (2011) there isn’t as much action, instead relying on deepening the characterization of its key characters, both good and bad. But mostly it seems to want to play the burgeoning romantic intrigue angle, which is frightfully tedious. More action, less conversation, better be the rule of thumb for the final two movies.
The best sequence, apart from the stunning opening, is when Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) joins Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) in a cave searching for a part of Voldemort’s soul called a Horcrux embedded in a locket that belonged to Salazar Slytherin. It is here that a truly nightmarish scene – and arguably the darkest, most menacing scene in the series so far – unfolds where Harry is besieged by skeletal ghoul demons called Inferi that emerge from the dark watery depths and pull Harry under. It was like something from my own nightmares! Dumbledore comes to a fiery rescue despite being a little worse for wear having drunk more than enough of the poisonous potion where the locket was hidden in.
The Death Eater’s siege on The Burrow is a good scene, with Harry running through the long grass, the sound of Fenrir (Dave Legeno) and Bellatrix (Helena Bonham Carter) all around him, it was tense and odious. Another good scene has Katie (Georgina Leonidas), a young female colleague of Harry’s become momentarily possessed by a curse meant for Dumbledore, and she’s seemingly strung up in mid-air, mouth agape, eyes wide in terror, then hurled back down onto the snow. Creepy stuff!
I’ve not read any of the novels, and I have no intention of reading them. Not my bag o’ bones. I was entertained by The Order of the Phoenix (2008), and I was beguiled enough by Half-Blood Prince. The movies are very well made for what they are. The fans should be thankful they’ve had some high calibre filmmakers delivering the movie adaptations. So many novels’ series fall flat after the first installment. The Harry Potter series gets progressively more and more ominous, which tickles my dark fancy. I’d love for the last two movies to be rated MA, but that is asking a little too much of young Harry methinks.
Oh, and Hagrid’s pet spider. Ugh.
Here's the trailer:
| 91 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog



























Comment by Natalina
My Life My Muse
Beta Girl Blog
I just never really got into the Harry Potter thing, ever since I worked at Amazon.com during the release of the first few books. It made me hate people. I was called every name under the sun by parents who were upset that their child's book arrived a day late. God forbid.
However, I guess I'm in the minority. I live right next door to a movie theater, and was unable to find a parking spot anywhere tonight. There are people all over outside waiting to get in and see this movie. There are people wearing capes and brandishing wands. I just watched out my window as a couple of people just got into quite a fist fight...I think they ran out of tickets....It's pandemonium!
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by Natalina
My Life My Muse
Beta Girl Blog
Comment by JESUS
What's Love?
Its just Lord of the Rings all over again accept with a lesser calibre of actors, far lesser quality of cinematography and an excessive use of CGI to tell a story.
Bring on DRAG ME TO HELL, that will blow your mind
horrorphile!
Comment by Lara M
Love Speaks
Food Slate
I am disappointed though to hear it's so *bad*...
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
JESUS, I don't think you quite got the tone of my "review". I actually think the cinematography of the last two Harry Potter movies have been excellent. And as for excessive use of CGI? I beg to differ. Jackson's LOTR trilogy used an extraordinary amount of CGI! And in all honesty I think the CGI work on this Harry Potter movie was pretty well integrated into the live action. Let's be fair, neither LOTR nor Harry Potter movies could realistically portray half of the imagery that they do without CGI. Don't get me wrong though, I'm not a fan of the series, I've only seen three (and a bit) of the movies, I'm much more a fan of darker adult fairie tales.
Lara, the movie is polarising audiences and critics. Sydney Morning Herald's Paul Byrnes loved it. Others are saying it lacks the "Potter" magic, whatever that means. I thought it was way too talky and too long. And there wasn't enough spectacle.
Comment by Natalina
My Life My Muse
Beta Girl Blog
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by JESUS
What's Love?
That blew my mind.
P.S I am really enjoying your blog
Comment by Natalina
My Life My Muse
Beta Girl Blog
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Harry Potter is definitely very silly in places, but that's JK Rowling for you. And she's been laughing all the way to the bank.
Comment by Dianna G
I Wish This Was 42
Fictional Worlds
In Half-Blood Prince it's all about the conversations that various people have. They seem pointless and annoying to you now, but the sixth movie/book is full of conversations that will be completely explained in book/movie seven/eight. These are things that need to be brought up and tied together in the seventh book/movie.
Harry Potter starts off pretty light and the sixth and seventh books are very very dark-the movies have to be similar.
The one thing I'm wary of is that the movies won't REALLY do Snape proper justice as he is revealed in the books; but we shall see.
I'll post my own review once I've read it, but those are my two cents; besides which, the book is nearly seven hundred pages long... the movie's going to be a couple hours.
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by Dianna G
I Wish This Was 42
Fictional Worlds
Snape is SO much more than you can possibly understand from HBP. And the flashback of him in the fifth movie is a TOTAL DISAPPOINTMENT.
They're missing an essential part of that scene and in the sixth movie, from what my friend told me, they're missing an essential line. They're either going to pull off a miracle (and spend an hour on Snape because they've neglected him so far) or I'm going to throw tomatoes at them 'cause the way it looks right now, they won't do him justice.
In the entire series, Snape is the most well designed and well written character. From a reader's PoV he's the most complex and from a writer's PoV he's simply an amazing piece of work, and I really hope the movies do him justice but I'm starting to doubt it.
~Dianna
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by Dianna G
I Wish This Was 42
Fictional Worlds
Apparently (and I think this is pure insanity) to add the extra (most important) part of the flashback in 5 would be too complicated; we have no idea about the line that's missing in the sixth movie though.
Up until the 5th movie they did a great job; in the fifth movie, the flashback is setting something big up to be discovered in the seventh. And it failed. And it annoyed me.
My review of the sixth movie, after I watch it... will be entertaining.
~Dianna
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile