Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
 
"SLEEP, THOSE LITTLE SLICES OF DEATH, HOW I LOATHE THEM." --- EDGAR ALLEN POE ::::::::::::: Spoilers for plot points and resolutions can occur within my movie reviews with or without warning. Read at your own risk.

Debate Battle! VAMPIRES or WEREWOLVES?

December 3rd 2007 03:20
Which creature is more in control of their dark side: vampires or werewolves?

vampire
Paul Mudie werewolf


These infamous creatures of horror have been terrifying and fascinating us for centuries; the fetid undead and the hirsute lycanthrope. Each has their own different folklores from culture to culture, but essentially the mythology remains the same. Those elements of menace are uniform when it comes down to brass bloody tacks.

But which supernatural creature is less afflicted and, perhaps, more dangerous? Is one, ultimately, more evil than the other? Obviously the vampire and the werewolf can be ferocious and lethal, but how do they keep the shadow in check? Are they able to control it at all?

Here are just a few things to consider, although they are not the final word, and are, obviously, open to conjecture.

Vampires
For:
~ They are immortal
~ They choose their victims specifically, often with intent
~ They are famous for their dark charm and seduction technique


Against:
~ They are undead
~ They are nocturnal
~ They rely on drinking blood for survival


Werewolves:
For:
~ They are hot-blooded with animal instincts
~ They are not afraid of sunlight
~ Some species of lycanthrope can transform at will


Against:
~ They carry a curse
~ Most are governed by the phase of the moon
~ They are bestial by nature



So, what do you think? Where does your opinion and/or argument lie?

1) The debate will take place via comments in response to the official debate post on the host blog.

2) Anyone can participate.

3) You can take either side of an argument regardless of your actual views. In fact you are encouraged to take the other side now and again, it's mind expanding.

4) Insults are to be witty and in good humor. Apart from that stick to arguing about the facts.

5) Anonymous comments are discouraged.


Werewolf illustration Copyright © Paul Mudie, 2008 All rights reserved.

417
Vote


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   

   


Comments
633 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Cibbuano

December 3rd 2007 03:30
Vampires. The class, the sexy pictures (as you've shown), the cool night vibe. It's all good.

I've never seen the appeal of werewolves, even as a kid. Changing into a wolf just doesn't seem that terrifying to me... maybe I'm watching the wrong movies?


Comment by jon

December 3rd 2007 03:44
I think Vampires are more in control of their dark-side as they are still aware of what they are doing. As far as I know Werewolves go all bestial and in many cases do not even remember what they did while they had the canines.

As far as being the more scary, I would have to say Vampires as well. I think I would have more of a chance of tricking a non-thinking beast rather than a smart vamp. Also they can fly which is pretty cool, and makes it much harder to get away.

Comment by Harry

December 3rd 2007 03:47
I have a pet Werewolf. He's not that scary at all, in fact he's rather cute!

Comment by James Rickard

December 3rd 2007 03:57
I'm a vampire fan but, then again , I saw the remake of Cat people back in the day. Kept me away from the zoo!

Comment by Bryn

December 3rd 2007 03:59
Harry, a pet werewolf?! I'm envious!

Comment by katyzzz

December 3rd 2007 04:18
Some choice, eeeeekkkkk, girl looks kinda sexy, that's if I can tell, need a bloke.

Comment by Michaelie

December 3rd 2007 05:23
The whole sexual thing with vampires is pretty damn cool, there is a sensual mystique about them which draws you to them even though you know what they intend...

BUT

I will have to go with werewolves. I think I have told you of my penchant for them, Bryn? It's because of Angela Carter's dark and depraved yet sensuous and sardonic stories. A lot from The Bloody Chamber feature werewolves or some twist on associated legends and folktales, and I can't get enough of them.

Michaelie

Comment by Damo

December 3rd 2007 05:29
Werewolves are the bikie equivalent of the undead. Rough, tough, in your face and untamed. Sure they were victims and can't help themselves but that is just like criminal blaming society. Who is the real monster? I blame society.

Whereas the Vampires are the used car salesmen of the undead. They are smug and snobbish, polite only to get what they want.. You can just picture Dracular saying his coffin was only used by a little old lady who drove it to church on Sundays.

Here is the problem. Werewolve are macho and masuline but they never seem to have much in the way of she-werewolves. However just like used car salesmen the vampires have hot babes all over the place.

Comment by Bryn

December 3rd 2007 06:22
Michaelie,
I'm with you there ... Vampires do have the sensual element down pat, but actually, there's an untapped animalistic sexuality about werewolves I'm intrigued by (I'm working on ideas for a screenplay ...) The Company of Wolves was a great movie (I haven't read the story though) ...

Damo, sensational comments! Excellent work! Brilliant analogies too!

The debate is hotting up indeed!!!

Comment by Mountain Fog

December 3rd 2007 13:44
For starters, the similarities;

They both chomp on your neck, usually uninvited.
They both either kill you, or enslave you to become one of them.
They both transform, so each has a dormant, safe time.
They are both victims and perpetrators.
They enjoy their work, when it's happening.

And I could go on...but then...no one would be bothered reading what I had said.

So, the real turnoffs...it has to be the hairy one, I mean, all you get from a Werewolf is a fanging, fleas and hair on your clothing...but I guess it is fair to say, who would care about clothing with your neck ripped open?

I go for the Vampire; he is human like, sophisticated, usually, has a sense of seduction and can deliver his moment of truth, with some sensual subtlety...unless you pissed him off..or her..sorry.

Of course, I share my bed every night with a small and slightly rotund "Were-pug", but we keep to our own kind!

cheers

fog

Comment by Lilla

December 3rd 2007 22:07
Bryn,

*lol* still laughing at Damo's comment too much to make one of my own, but it was pretty much along those lines.

Vampires do everything with a premeditated sensuality, wharewolves seem victims of circumstance, but I love their wildness and honesty. However, I am a fickle woman where ghouls and demons are concerened, and wiill probably change my mind tomorrow, anyway.

Hard decision.

Lilla ...

Comment by Cibbuano

December 3rd 2007 22:13
damo, great comment. You don't see any werewolf babes, do you?


Comment by Damo

December 3rd 2007 22:21
If it rains werevolves smell like wet dog.

Comment by Bryn

December 3rd 2007 23:43
Seems the vamps are currently winning the argument ... but I feel the underwolf return.

Comment by Harry

December 4th 2007 00:02
Do Werewolves live forever? The fact that Vamps are immortal is a bonus.

Comment by Mr Nice Guy

December 4th 2007 00:42
Our hirsute brothers seem to get a bit of a bad rep in comparison to the devilishly cool vampish types - a cause not assisted in any way by Warren Zevon and his little 70's ditty "Werewovles of London".

That said I tend to side with the often Armani-clad debanaire types who oft have a penchant for either the gorgeous gals or the pin-up lads.

To say I'm a bit of a sucker for that kind of thing would be too horrible a pun though.

MNG

Comment by Damo

December 4th 2007 02:25
Hold the phone.
Vampires might look neat and party like it is Translavania 1999 but would you let your daughter go out with one?
No me, no way. nu uh!
Atleast with a bikie werewolf what you see is what you get. They may be rough on the outside but I bet they treat their mothers well. If only they would wash their clothes more often.

Vampires are that sickly super nice guy who is just to friendly to trust. I hate used-car salesmen real-estate agents vampires who suck the life out of you before running off with your daughter. When she finnally gets to his castle she find it is a dump and he has a surprize for her. Meet my other wifes. If I wanted that for my daughter I would move to the southern states of the USA.

Comment by Ahmed

December 4th 2007 17:21
I'd say vampires, they suck all your blood out and leave you witthout a beating heart. Thats good, at least I wo't have to suffer from a brokenheart again

Comment by Lilla

December 4th 2007 21:44
Ahmed,

Not to put too light a spin on your circumstance, but it sounds like you've already had your first vampire bite . . .that's okay my friend, traditionally it takes three bites before you join the walking dead and become a vampire yourself...

You might try a warewolf next, their bite is more honest and heals quicker.

Lilla ...

Comment by DeAnne

December 4th 2007 22:30
Wonderful comments. But - it seems everyone is stating preferences - either which is cooler, or scarier, etc.

The question, if I'm not mistaken, was which is more in control of his/her darkside? That really depends on the movie/story in question. I am a sucker (no pun intended) for vampire flicks.

Honestly, I don't think either has much control over his/her darkside, unless you want to talk about a movie like Teen Wolf. In the scary ones, neither vampires nor werewolves have much control.

I guess, if I had to choose, I'd say werewolves, because they are only dark when there is a full moon. Vampires, on the other hand, are always that way.

Comment by Bryn

December 4th 2007 23:39
DeAnne, thankyou for pulling the debate back to its point of question!!! And I nice, strong argument too, cheers!

Comment by Ahmed

December 5th 2007 01:56
Yeah but Vampires are 100% dead during the daytime so that in effect makes them inanimate and not so evil.

Comment by KylieW

December 5th 2007 03:12
I think that Vamps are more in control of their dark side. They can choose not to drink blood from living humans (there's pigs blood or blood banks).

While werewolves are okay for most of the month. Come full moon time, Werewolves have no control over their actions.

So to me, I think vamps are more in control.

The exception to that of course would be newly made vamps. Apparently they don't have much control over themselves. But I guess new werewolves probably don't either.

And I really like that we're debating this as though both are totally real and that we're all practically experts!!

Comment by Bryn

December 5th 2007 04:56
Kylie, hear! hear!
I'm with you there ... vampires are in control of themselves, generally speaking, for most of the time, except perhaps when they become desperate for blood ... whilst werewolves once they've transformed as ravaging beasts of prey, unable to rationalise between what is good or evil. Vampires know they're evil and generally relish it, like its a gift. Although there are the vampires who behave like their immortality is a curse, and they are afllicted, therefore have no control over the darkness that rules their lives.

Comment by D. Armenta

December 5th 2007 23:46
Hiya Bryn, old buddy! It's good to read you again!

Well, as the Debate Fan, I guess I will defend the less popular side and say that werewolves are more in control of their dark side than vampires are.

I cite the following, from literature and movies:

1) In "An American werewolf in London", David (main character/werewolf) was remorseful when he learned of the people he'd killed. Also, at the end scene when Alex (his love interest) is calling to him and crying in a dead-end alley, he doesn't attack her while she speaks to him. At the end he makes a suicidal leap at the large gathering of police, knowing they will kill him. He had also called home prior to this and said his goodbyes to his family, a sure sign of him making the decision to commit suicide ahead of time. That all shows some degree of control over one's dark side.

2) In Stephen King's excellent vampire novel, "Salem's Lot", the vampires seem to have no qualms about luring their own spouses, children, and other loved ones to the same fate they themselves suffer. There is no evidence of any vampires "fighting the urge" to save even their own children from becoming one of the undead. That shows a decided lack of control.

Counterpoint anyone?

Comment by Bryn

December 6th 2007 03:49
Armenta, you've nailed the argument beautifully.

Comment by Mountain Fog

December 6th 2007 15:38
DArmenta asks for counterpoint?...hmm..

(SFX: LIGHTENING STRIKE, CLAP of THUNDER, EVIL WITCHES CACKLE)


Point One:

One movie an argument doth not make!
So, to argue for the werewolf, by citing the behaviour of one werewolf in "An American Werewolf In London", seems a little trite, a little shallow, a little lacking in historical depth and precedent.
One could also cite the majority of werewovles in the same film, as proving they lack any remorse, compassion or will to discontinue their antics, and that the actions of a lone (hero)werewolf were, at best, an anomaly and probably the result of a contaminated spirit and so not representative of werewolves per se.

To argue against the majority, one would have to cite many more instances in many other films, going back to the original werewolf film itself, that being; "The Werewolf":

The Werewolf is a 1913 silent short that was the first werewolf film made, directed by Henry MacRae. Although the film was destroyed, in a fire in 1924, the script survived, by Ruth Ann Baldwin, and it was based on the short story The Werewolves by Henry Beaugrand.

Plot Summary of The Werewolf:

A Navajo woman becomes a witch after erroneously coming to believe that her husband has abandoned her. She teaches the same skills to her daughter Watuma, who transforms into a wolf in order to carry out vengeance against the invading white settlers. Then, 100 years after Watuma's death, she returns from the dead to kill again.


Hardly the stuff of a conscience laden werewolf hell bent on self sacrifice!

Point Two:

DArmenta's defence, as it stands, portrays the werewolf as the only victim, but, were they not all victims at one point, both werewolf and vampire?

Point Three:

To attempt to whitewash all werewolves, by citing the American Werewolf and his suicide, is both incorrect and disingenuous. Although pitiable, even heroic, the decision was one of self inflicted death, it was not suicide, it was actually an act of "self murder", for he deems it best to kill the 'beast' to save another, and that beast is himself. By the way, "self murder" has been acknowledged in a NSW coronial inquiry.

Point Four:

Although I bow to those of a greater in-depth knowledge of werewolves, I suggest that they not only lack reason for their violent onslaughts, they also lack the ability to lessen the suffering of their vicitms and to distinguish between the small and defenseless, even their own family, unlike vampires.

In Conclusion:

The vast majority, if not all werewolves, before the American youngster werewolf, have killed their families, and other defenseless innocent victims of all age groups. The fact that they may beg to be tied up and locked away before they transform, that they may warn their families to lock themselves away from harm, that they may feel attrition once they are human again, is of no consequence.

For it is their actions as a werewolf that count. And as already stated, as evidenced in every werewolf film before An American Werewolf in London, their actions are brutal, violent and undiscerning, or caring, for whomever they attack, or the suffering they inflict.

I rest my case Your Honour, Lord Bryn!

(SFX: one solitary, slow, mocking clap from a bored audience member)

fog
barrister for the vampires.


Comment by Bryn

December 8th 2007 06:36
The Jury is still out ...

Comment by Anonymous

December 28th 2007 16:41
if you think about it werewolves and vampires are both cursed and being immortal just makes the curse bigger for vampires because atleast werewolves can die of old age and are released from their curses

Comment by Bryn

December 29th 2007 07:44
Anon, great point!!!

Comment by Anonymous

December 29th 2007 17:18
i'm the same anon and i read a book and there where vampires and werewolves in it and the vampires were annoying and once the tasted blood they went into a frenzy and wouldn't stop where as the werewolves had control and could even follow military tactics and even use formation

Comment by Bryn

December 30th 2007 02:30
The argument sways again ....

Comment by Anonymous

January 1st 2008 18:21
Werewolves are the best
sure having sex is great but think this
you are not all ways a vampire and some werewolves chicks have to be hot, so bang them
also werewolves has less ways to die than vampires
you have to special create the weapon to kill a werewolf but to kill a vampire all have to go is to wal-mart to get the weapons, best and cheapest is falshlight, another thing vampires cant go into a building without first being invited, also there has to be ugly vampire chicks

Comment by Anonymous

January 1st 2008 18:42
i also play monsters as a werewolf
to join the game use this link

Your text goes here

Comment by Bryn

January 3rd 2008 02:26
I'm curious "Anon", how old are you? And where from?

Comment by Anonymous

January 3rd 2008 17:35
well i made the first two comments i'm 11 and i'm from ireland

Comment by Anonymous

January 4th 2008 16:48
Your text goes here

I do believe that vampires are more in controll of their dark sides because I personally have wittnessed much more stories of wolf like creatures that can walk like humans, more so than hearing of a strange neck wound that consists of two wounds, and the victim being completly drained of blood. I do believe though in my opinion, werewolfs are filthy, disburing, mean, and smell like dog. yuck!
Vampires are suductive, beautiful, dark, sinister, and can be loving and caring.
Werewolves can be loving and caring although they are very vilolent.
I am not compleltly taking one side, but Vampires appeal to me more so than dogs.

Comment by Bryn

January 5th 2008 00:57
Anon, you're a fairly informed 11-year-old ... and possibly the youngest visitor I've had here at my blog (that I know of) ... cheers for your comments!

Comment by Anonymous

January 5th 2008 11:51
well my IQ is over the 11 year old average and you know i'd prefer to die soon of massive injuries given by a werewolf rather than die slowly of weakness and loss of blood like if i'm going to die they might aswell make it quick
p.s. i love reading i really liked the lord of the rings

Comment by Bryn

January 8th 2008 05:05
Lord of the Rings is good, but The Hobbit is better.

Comment by Anonymous

January 8th 2008 16:07
yea i've got to go with you there i really didn't like the tom bombadil part in the fellowship

Comment by Bryn

January 9th 2008 00:36
Peter Jackson was wise to drop it for the movie.

Comment by Anonymous

January 13th 2008 07:59
I'm a huge werewolf fan. I love that they are less than perfect and as long as there's no full moon-they can pass for human, which might be hard for a vampire. Sure, vampires are portrayed as super sexy and seductive and blah blah blah-but doesn't that get old?
Werewolves might not be able to control themselves when they transform, but at least they have remorse later on. But vampires are in control the whole time and know exactly what they do and don't care. They are purely evil.

Comment by Bryn

January 13th 2008 23:14
Anon, nice comments, cheers! I'm with you there ...

Comment by wolfgirl

January 14th 2008 06:55
Glad you agree =)
The more gruesome weres are-the better
I thought your site was pretty interesting, so I registered.

(I'm the last anon comment)

Comment by Bryn

January 15th 2008 07:09
Wolfgirl, nice name and avatar btw ...
I do love vampirism (Bram Stoker's Dracula is one of my favourite novels), but I'm very partial to lycanthropy ... something very carnal and primal about them, and they look far more menacing, although I was impressed with the look of the vamps in 30 Days of Night.
So what are your favourite werewolf movies then?
Cheers for the blog props too!

Comment by wolfgirl

January 16th 2008 03:35
Hmm, to tell the truth, I'm really not sure, I've hardly seen any good werewolf movies, or ones that could scare me, but I really did like The Howling. I guess I'm more into literature and mythology. I going to make a list of werewolf movies to watch, lol, and Blood and Chocolate doesn't count, ugh....
I've never seen any really scary vampire movies either. My friend said she was reading the book, I am Legend, which the movie was based off, and in the book the infected people were actually more like vampires than rabid zombies.
Was 30 Days of Nights creepy? I saw some girls complaining that the vampires in the movie weren't sexy, hahaha

Comment by wolfgirl

January 16th 2008 03:47
I just ordered: The Essential Guide to Werewolf Literature and The Bloody Chamber

Comment by Bryn

January 16th 2008 03:56
Wolfgirl,
yeah The Howling rocks. So does An American Werewolf in London and Dog Soldiers.
I loved the novel I Am Legend, I'm reticent in seeing the movie ... I wish Ridley Scott had managed to make it back in the 90s, but the project was scuttled ...
30 Days of Night was very good, some sensational special effects and pretty hideous vamps ... my papa was in it too, he's the first victim, the old guy who gets his head ripped off !

Comment by Wolfie

January 18th 2008 14:39
One side Vampires human-like icreesed power, agility, sight, hearing and smelling. Growing more powerful with aging. Using cunning and seduction as much as violence(but i mean if you are stupid and ugly that won't change after u become vampire)?

Other side Werewolves human-like except fullmoon. When transformed all physical traits drastic increese and all mental traits decreese. Learning to control their curse over time, making them able to change to wolf form at will, and regaing control of their actions when transformed.

I'm i big werewolf fan, and say screw vamps

Comment by Bryn

January 19th 2008 00:45
Wolfie, oooooooooowwwwwwww!!!!

Comment by Anonymous

January 26th 2008 09:30
oh and also if you were a vampire imagine living 1000 years nothing would amuse you or make you laugh it would just be a dull and boring life

(i'm the 11 year old guy)

Comment by Bat Beats Wolf, Its as simple as that

February 4th 2008 05:16
Your text goes hereYour text goes here

Although Warewolves are able to take control of their powers after a while they still die, as a result they must regularly introduce new members to heard. Whereas Vampires, being immortal do not need to add to their group once they deem them selves strong enough. So while the foolish MORTAL!! werewolves are biting everyone human in sight just to keep their group going, Vampires can carefully choose new initiates without having to make any hasty decisions.

Counter argue that, FUR BALLS!!

Comment by Bryn

February 5th 2008 04:16
Bat Beats Wolf ... sound argument, I must say, but I still dig the lycanthrope ... I just like wolves. Period.

Comment by Anonymous

February 8th 2008 21:54
yea but if a vampire was to atack a wakened school boy holding a pencil it wouldmost likely be killed

Comment by Bryn

February 10th 2008 06:25
Anon, you're damn right.


Are you a lycathrope?

Comment by Anonymous

February 11th 2008 21:04
well i'm not quite sure what that means i'm only young.i do have a book that has werewolves and vampires in it(its not based on them)even so i would reccomend it "the cry of the icemark"

Comment by Bryn

February 11th 2008 23:32
I'll check it out ... a lycanthrope is a werewolf.

Comment by Anonymous

February 12th 2008 16:48
i could write the blurb here for you if you want p.s. blurb means the text on the back of the book

Comment by Bryn

February 12th 2008 21:43
Anon ... I'll check out the book title when I'm next at a bookstore ... and btw, i know what a blurb is, but feel free to blurt it out

Comment by Ascry

February 18th 2008 05:52
Lets move away from the were form of the werewolf i commend them for have normal relationships 'cause i heard the feed instinct can carry over and make them change, so it takes a stronger person to seek out a social life and keep the beast in check.
keep'in it in check

Comment by Anonymous

February 18th 2008 13:54
[SIZE=3][SIZE=2]Vampires are very polite and they have a special charme to everyone ,so i think thy win all these i´m a big vampire fan.
I am specialy against werewolfs because they are more often than not very brutal and aggressive.
Vampires are the perfect creatures of the night!
Your text goes here

Comment by Bryn

February 19th 2008 04:56
The debate continues ... neither howl and bite nor flap and suck

Comment by The Real Jim Sladey

February 20th 2008 02:57
I would say that vampires are more in control of their dark side, as (this was mentioned before) they are constantly living that darker side. If a vampire embraces their immortality, they can simply get on with things. Werewolves lose all self-control when they turn, and they have no control over as to WHEN they turn, as this is determined by an external factor (a full-moon). So in my opinion, werewolves are less in control of their dark side (anyone got a response?)

However, this doesn't mean that werewolves are more to blame for their actions. A vampire does not lose all self-control in its permanent dark side state like a werewolf does. If a vampire chooses to act in an evil manner, surely this is less excusable than a werewolf losing all self-control whether they like it or not? How can a werewolf embrace its violent transformation, when (I assume!) they are barely conscious of what they are doing in that state? Vampires can come to terms with their existence, are consciously aware of what theyre doing and CHOOSE their actions.

I think the question of sexuality is an interesting one. A vampire is manipulative, charming, making you submit to their will through their powers of seduction. I have not come across references to werewolf sexuality in any books or films... A werewolf, in wolf form, is obviously uncontrollable, a whirlwind of unbridled fury. But when in human form, I think a werewolf would still contain that bestial, raw power, which has the potential to be far more exciting... vampires play games, werewolves are blunt and brutal, but honest. They make no excuses for what they are.

I think the fact that werewolves have less control over their dark side has a much greater sexual appeal... who knows what could happen...

Comment by Bryn

February 20th 2008 22:40
Jim, nice solid argument there, and good work for bringing up the sexuality of lycanthropes. I too, believe them to be a very carnal creature. And that vampires are inherently more evil.

Comment by Anonymous

March 1st 2008 21:16
The full moon glows, foreboding,
And I quake from head to feet.
For this night I know, in the town below,
A werewolf prowls the street.

He stalks with stealth and cunning
In his search for a soul to eat.
With matted hair, and jaws that tear,
A werewolf prowls the street.

His face is filled with fury
As his brain cries out for meat.
And, oh, his prey shall not see day
For the werewolf prowls the street.

So I shake beneath my covers
And I shiver in my sheets,
And I cower in my bed, with a pillow on my head,
As the werewolf prowls the street.

Comment by Anonymous

March 1st 2008 21:19
werewolves

He feels the pain of splitting skin
The rage that bursts out from within
The rage that courses through his veins
Through which he channels all his pain

The hunter, released from ancient bonds
Tastes the blood for which he longs
Freinds, family, they all mean naught
This life is new, with danger fraught

Gaia, the Earth Mother, blesses them all
In return they answer her call
A call to arms, defeat the Wyrm
To succeed there is much to learn

Control the anger, harness the rage
The ancient force, the curse of ages
So now he welcomes the rage within
This rage, once bidden, beneath his skin.

Comment by Wolfsbane

March 1st 2008 22:02
did u write that urself? that's pretty cool.

Comment by Anonymous

March 4th 2008 17:00
a werewolfs lament

Dark is the night,
the full moon haunts the sky
and haunts my spirit
and my body.
And moonlight shrouds my soul
in pain and rage.

Dark is the night,
in shadows I will hide
and yearn for healing
and for silence.
And when there is no rest
I think of death.

Dark is the night,
and cursed by a bite′s
my life, forever
I′ll be damned.
And love I′ll always shun –
it′s for the best.

Dark is the night,
alone I′m on the run.
In silent moonlight
there′s a shadow,
and blood drips from his claws
like ruby rain.

Now dawns the day,
my memory awakes
and I am moaning
for my victim-
the body, pale and crimson
′neath my feet.

Falls now the night,
the new moon dark and black.
And I am fleeing
from this place,
from this village and the people
I called home.

Comment by Mystic

March 6th 2008 04:38
I see where you all come from and understand all your beliefs...but I believe that they are somewhat tied. I mean, if you think about it...vampires have their sexual side and love to torture their prey before feeding.

Werewolves...they kill just the same, they love the chase and mess with your mind until you can't take it anymore. You may think that they're just stupid dogs but some are smarter than humans.

I admit that vampires have more intellect than werewolves but I don't see how intelligence has to do with being in control of your dark side. It all depends on the type of vampire...or even werewolf.

That's my belief.
Mystic

Comment by Anonymous

March 6th 2008 18:51
just found this and thought I'd throw my two cents in for the werewolves. Lots of people are writing about how they go completely animal and have no control. However, besides American werewolf, there are several examples of werewolves that do have control.
First the werewolves in the Twilight series by Stephanie meyer are quite in tuned to their human side even when in the wolf form. They also do not attack humans but are created specifically to fight against vampires.

And second what about the legend of Bisclavret? In this legend the werewolf remains a faithfull companion to the king and never attacks any one until his former wife, and betrayer, comes to court. This suggests they can control their darker side and also suggests they stay connected to their former life.

So, here's two examples do with them what you will.

Comment by Anonymous

March 9th 2008 01:10
I'll stick to the vampires. Surely, they can get mad by bloodlust, teared apart by their way of life or not be able to take the changes once they transform, but their powers are awesome, you know.

Some of them even knowns necromancy, a trait giving them infinitly more power, being able to raise vast armies of skeletions, ghouls, zombies and other dead stuff. The werewolf is often described as the equal of a vampire, with a different life, but equal in power. But they never gets powers to rival necromancy, save a small gift of gaining the trust of animals, particulary wolwes. This points out that vampires got more control of their share of power.

The vampire can also do much more than the mad werewolfs, and while appearing sligthly easier to kill, they are not.

Okay, a child might kill a vampire with the right weapons and a little luck, but only certain things can hurt the monster. a werewolf can be killed by anything containing considerable power. Add the other stuff and you got the true lord of the night.

Vampires 4eva! (or better yet, not...)

Comment by Anonymous

March 9th 2008 08:39
in many books i've read the werewolves could not be taken down and in one of them a werewolf got a spear in the ribs and the soldier who did it said it was only a minor scratch for a werewolf it also said there was a battle between vampires and werewolves and the werewolves won

Comment by impartial Anonymous

March 19th 2008 03:07
all of your examples of the animal and primal thinking of werewolfs, and of the sexy vampire without remorse are good points. All of these images about them were created by Hollywood and peoples over active imagination. Until we observe a real vampire and werewolf in the "wild" , we will never know.

But in my opnion neither of these creaters are immortal because if look at certain movies, which many of you have, you will find that both species have counters. The movie Underworld is a prime example: UV (ultra violet) bullets and silver nitrate bullets were very effective against them.

Comparing werewolfs to vampires is like apples to oranges. Although if they did fight each other a werewolf would win in hand to hand combat and a vampire at longer range.

Thus no one is better each with their own strenghts and weaknesses. All that matters is opinion. And when you finally figure out which is better. You have to ask your self one more question.

Is it better than Chuck Norris?
didn't think so!

Comment by eVE

March 19th 2008 15:45
In conclusion neither wins!
If you were to make a being out of these 2 it would have been the perfect "in control of it's dark side" creature!!
I believe that they both have the same amount of darkness in them, that depending from witch side are you looking.
I do favor vampires for the sensuality, the perfect definition of the 2 sexes, the sharp fangs, the cold and lifeless body, the mystique...that being of course for their identity with humans...
But werewolves are none the less below what I said. Every human has an animalic part in them that gets out now and then in rages of fury. So werewolves represent that part, when you transcend into another being/an animal.


p.s.: Bryn I blame you for having that idiotically book as a favorite...
I'm from Romania and besides that the book is very bad written, it casts a bad shadow on my country. And as a surplus in it's stupidity, people actually believe that we live like that, and believe that Romania has only rocky mountains and blood drinking peasants...and so on!
To say the truth Bram Stoker didn't even actually come to Romania, he wrote the book in Ireland!

Comment by impartial Anonymous

March 20th 2008 00:46
I' m with eVE on his post
you hit the nail right on it's head
another though, why if vampires and werewolfs are so much (for the lack of a better word) "better" than humans in the aspects of strenght, agility and cunning. why did we devolp weapons to kill these creatures. This proves once again that humanity is the most advanced killing machine created, intended or not. We are constatly finding better ways to kill things. So are vampires and werewolfs really that "evil". Or do we just need to look onto ourselfs to find the true monsters, that maybe werewolfs and vampires were modeled after.

Don't get me wrong, there were great people in this world like Mother Teresa and Jesus and Gandi who thought of every way to rid the world
of killing. But just think for a moment about what I said.

Sorry about getting so off the topic of the post.

Comment by Anonymous

March 20th 2008 16:13
Actually People Vampires Dont All turn into Bats there are many different Clans of vampires. the ones that shapeshift are called the Gangrel and actually some Rare members of the Gangrel Clan can shapeshift into WOLVES
and no im not making this up im making a report about it

Comment by Anonymous

March 24th 2008 16:48
why are we having a debate over 2 make believe creatures its not like any of you have seen ether one so why dont we just say some people have differentbeliefs than others

Comment by Mystic

March 24th 2008 18:18
If you don't believe in them then why would you be on a site like this? Sorry, but I think it's quite stupid that you would be here or even post something if you don't believe.

Comment by Wolfish Insincts

April 2nd 2008 20:14
werewolves arent 'hotblooded', and the sunlight is the bomb, we're not scared of it. jeez, why is it everyone always wants us wolves to be the bad guys??

CHAOS

Comment by Shady Anonymous

April 5th 2008 21:12
In terms of whose cooler/all-around-better, I will always remain faithful to the wolf pack. Werewolves are just so insanely awesome, & I really can't bring myself to ever draw that close of a comparison between them & vampires. Vamps are cool antagonists, but I could never feel much sympathy for them, even while reading "Interview with a Vampire" or "Twilight." Vampire angst just annoys me. Werewolves make great antagonists or protagonists because they can be so vicious when transformed, but I really can feel sympathy for them. They're actually human for most of the time, whereas vampires are not. Also, if you don't accept that a werewolf could beat a vampire in any fight, you're just deluded. It is definitely way easier to destroy a vampire than a werewolf. All you need is a sharp piece of wood, or hell, even some garlic. Silver bullets & wolfsbane just ain't as easy to obtain.

However, I think that vampires probably do have more control over their dark side, especially if we're looking at more contemporary fiction ideals. They seem to keep a free will, though most of them are supposed to be the embodiment of evil & don't really care anyway.

But if you read into the actual origin legends of werewolves, they're a lot different than in modern fiction. Some of them were put under curses by witches or sorcerers, some were witches or sorcerers doing Satan's deeds, & others were warriors for God, fighting the agents of Hell to keep Earth safe. Except for those who were cursed, most of them were supposed to be fully aware of what they were doing & could definitely control their animal form. However, the cursed ones are said to have little control & were supposed to kill those they loved most first. So the question of how much power over their dark side did they have could go either way.

In most myths, werewolves were incredibly intelligent & sometimes immortal, giving them some abilities similar to those of vampires. I don't know all that much about vampire folklore, simply because I've never been very interested. However, I do know that most tales portrayed them as very ugly & corpse-like, more like zombies than the suave guys we see in movies today. So yeah, not quite so sexy. Give me wolfish, carnal desires any day.

Comment by teron

April 6th 2008 21:00
ok i will cooose the werewolve becouse when it comes down to it the werewolve has unknown brute strength so when they have a all out battle to the death the werewolve would win...granted the vampire is suppose to be "imortal" but not when thier be-headed...and granted that the vampire has remarcable speed and can fly....but in an all out battle thoes things dont relly matter expecially wen the vamp has its wings ripped off witch would slow it down ALOT from the pain........so in my opinion in the end the werewolve would win

-----Teron-----

Comment by Bryn

April 9th 2008 04:09
eVE
p.s.: Bryn I blame you for having that idiotically book as a favorite...
I'm from Romania and besides that the book is very bad written, it casts a bad shadow on my country. And as a surplus in it's stupidity, people actually believe that we live like that, and believe that Romania has only rocky mountains and blood drinking peasants...and so on!
To say the truth Bram Stoker didn't even actually come to Romania, he wrote the book in Ireland!

Each to their own as far as liking or disliking fiction. Personally I really enjoyed the letter/diary style of prose in which Bram Stoker wrote Dracula, and I think some of the imagery he invoked was brilliantly effective. Who cares if he wrote it in Ireland or Timbuktu ... I wrote a screenplay and set in Spain, yet I'm a New Zealander living in Australia. And one would be silly to think of Romania in a bad light simply because one novelist decided to set a horror movie in a certain country. What about director Eli Roth and setting Hostel in Slovakia ... again, you'd have to be naive to think Slovakia is Torture Central.

Comment by Wolfsbane

April 16th 2008 23:15
Thats a good point. There are like no werewolf books out there that I can find. does anyone know any good ones?

I think werewolves are the bomb, b/c even though there is this "killer instinct" inside of them, depending on what culture protrays them, they are animals, and animals love their partners or their pack with an intensity that no vampire nor human can ever come close to.

Comment by Bryn

April 17th 2008 06:48
Wolfsbane, owwww!!!

Comment by Mystic

April 18th 2008 01:04
nice lol that is true that werewolves do love their packs or mates more than humans or vampires could love theirs, but how does that deal with being in control of your dark side?

Comment by Anonymous

April 20th 2008 14:55
Your text goes hereYour text goes hereYour text goes hereYour text goes here[COLOR=Fuchsia][SIZE=7]i think that i would have to go with the vampires to because they are in more controll of thare dark side when werwolfs they dont chose what they eat they just eat anthing that they come in contact with so vampires pin point thare food and they also don't eat just to eat they only eat because they need to be able to live.they also can controll what they do unlike werwolfs who don't know what they are doing or what they are eating.

Comment by Jackay

April 22nd 2008 09:35
Your text goes hereYour text goes hereYour text goes hereYour text goes herewerewolves are sooooooooooooo much better
=D
gah at vampires
actually
i dont mind vampires
but werewolves are better

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 23rd 2008 12:19
i think a group of vampires would be a bit like a group of gay heroin addicts (see more here), i think essentially i could get along with them and they wouldnt pick on me as a victim . . . i think werewolves are scary as hell and completely inhuman, i would not want to hang out with a werewolf any more than i would want to hang out with any kind of wolf! haha

Comment by Bryn

April 23rd 2008 23:11
Nice comment Morgan ... Have you read much fiction on either creature? I loved The Vampire Lestat by Anne Rice and I love Dracula by Bram Stoker. I'm curious about the pulpy werewolf/vampire crime novels that feature a female slayer, but can't offhand think of the name of the author ...
Excellent post on vampirism mirroring sexuality btw ...
I made my own vampire movie fifteen years ago in my home town of Wellington, NZ, called Penumbra. Labour of love, following the plight of a young woman as she slowly changes into a vampire, from the living to the undead. It's deeply flawed but has some great imagery and tone in places.

Comment by Morgan Bell

April 24th 2008 07:44
wow that sounds fascinating, do you still make films?

i find the way myths evolve based on real life medical or mental conditions to be really interesting, like how stories about the local reclusive alcoholic or drug user who may have skin photosensitivity or eye photophobia has so many tall tales about them they are turned into a monster . . . they may have suffered from what we now diagnose as bi-polar, psychosis, depression, agoraphobia, or multiple personality disorder

ive probably watched much more films than what ive read

Comment by Bryn

April 26th 2008 00:17
I've made a handful of short film and videos, the last one was here in Sydney ten years ago (sheesh, has it been that long?!), neo-blue. I've written a feature and am currently writing another couple ...

Comment by Anonymous

April 30th 2008 11:16
we werewolves can beat vampires anyday!

for 1 we can stay in sunlight in out uhman form
while some [im not tlaking about blade] cant take it for only a few seconds [ive been reaserching]
and its hard to find 100% real silver tahn getting a pieace of wood and putting it into a vampires heart

you really gotta think about this stuff

Comment by Kael

May 1st 2008 01:13
I've always thought of vampires as being very homo-erotic... All the movies even, the way of turning someone into a vampire is very sexual, and its usually a guy turning another guy into a vampire... sorry, but i don't find anything cool about that. just can't relate to that...

Now on to the werewolves being "bestial" and not in control of their actions. All portrayals of this has been based on the assumption that wolves are beasts that have no control over themselves... which couldn't be farther from the truth. Wolves travel, and hunt in a pack, which requires some sort of control and organization. A literal translation of the word werewolf simply means "man wolf" were being the anglo word for man. that being said, werewolves are much like men, and much like wolves. both can be incredibly brutal, and both can be incredibly loving. both are generally social animals, wolves travel in packs, so do people. A wolf pack chooses which animal it will take down very carefully, much as a human hunter would choose his/her own victim, so, really... who's to say that a werewolf has no control over their attacks? I think a werewolf, if truly were a "man-wolf" would be in complete control of his/her actions.

I think this is the exact opposite with vampires. According to the mythology, many people accused of vampirism were said to feed on their friends and families at night, meaning, they attacked those who were just the most accessible at the moment, and taking no time to carefully select anything.

when it comes down to it, if you wanted to put it into a real-world context, werewolves would be much more in control than vampires. Because after all, wolves are very intelligent, and man is very intelligent, so it would only be logical to assume that a man-wolf would be intelligent. vampires however must die to become a vampire. meaning all brain functions would cease leaving only the primal need to feed, much like a zombie.

Anyway, this is my argument on the matter.

Comment by Bryn

May 1st 2008 01:27
Kael, beautifully put. And one of the best points yet on the argument for werewolves. Cheers! HOWWWWL!!!

Comment by Kael

May 1st 2008 02:29
Thanks.

I was in the middle of watching 30 Days of Night as I posted my previous comment.... Actually that was the reason I found this blog in the first place. But one thing I found interesting about that movie was how little the vampires were like vampires, and how much they actually were like werewolves. Even in their movements a lot of times. Which is exactly why I like that movie. They worked as a pack, they stalked, like wolves, they communicated with various howls and shrieks... even made use of claws to kill, instead of just neck bighting. Of course there were several other factors that make them seem more like werewolves than vampires... really the only thing I can think of that was vampiristic about them at all, was the fact that they fed on blood, and were allergic to the sun. Pretty much everything else about them was quite lycanthropic. But thats just my assessment of the film.

Comment by Bryn

May 1st 2008 06:53
... and a very insightful assessment too. I gather you read my review of the movie? My father was in it, he played the old man, the first victim.
As much as I love vampirism, I'm probably more of a fan of lycanthropy. Not sure why exactly ... I do love wolves, more than bats, so that's probably a strong factor. Curiously I don't think there are many truly excellent movies of each sub-genre ... What are your favourites?

Comment by Kael

May 1st 2008 07:16
well.. there's the obvious choices... The Howling, Dog Soldiers, American Werewolf in London, and to be honest, I rather enjoyed American Werewolf in Paris too... Then there's Ginger Snaps, and even though it took a sort of tongue in cheek kind of satire of the genre, Cursed was an interesting example of a werewolf stalking specific victims to accomplish a goal. The Howling and Dog Soldiers were good examples of the wolves working together as a pack, or family unit, and the Howling showed the intelligence lycanthropes can possess, Also their ability to control themselves. But as a whole, i think Hollywood has not done a very good job with the werewolf genre. Most movies are laughable, and the ones that are decent lack in the effects. Then the films that have good effects are horrible movies... I prefer to read about werewolves rather than watch movies on them. have you ever heard of the story based role play game, Werewolf The Forsaken? I've never played, but I do own the book, it really breaks down lycanthropy so people can really understand it... It also lists a good bit of references on the subject of werewolves as well. hah, i'm rambling... i've got a bit of obsession with lycanthropy, to be honest.

Comment by Kael

May 1st 2008 07:21
Btw, your father did an excellent job. I actually felt bad when he was killed in the movie, which is rare for me. The emotion in his eyes during that scene was moving to say the least.

Comment by Kael

May 1st 2008 07:27
Yet another comment from me, hah. I feel I left something out. I forgot to mention the vampire movies. To be honest, I don't like many vampire movies. I find them to be tasteless and unoriginal. There's rarely a new spin on anything in that genre. I did like Nosferatu, but thats a classic. However, most vampire movies that have been made since, have just been boring. I never sat all the way through interview with a vampire, it was far too boring for me. I like the more violent take they've been portraying in some of the newer movies though, like 30 Days of Night (but we already know why i like that movie) and actually I Am Legend as well, i do wish, however, that it would've been more true to the book.. But I understand why they changed the things they did. They need to make money after all, heh.

Comment by Bryn

May 1st 2008 23:47
Kael, I like your comments very much. On the whole I agree with you quite closely on your choices and attitude.
I haven't seen An American Werewolf in Paris, but I heard it was dreadful and it didn't look very good from the small bits I did see ... I didn't like I Am Legend at all, but then I loved the novel.
I've reviewed most of my favourite werewolf and vampire movies ... There's a title/word search option up on the left hand side of the blog if you're keen to dip in a little deeper ...
I'm keen to read up more on lycnathropy definitely! I'll keep an eye out for that book. Any others you'd recommend?
And cheers for the comment on my papa, I'll definitely tell him. He's originally a stage actor and used to be head tutor of the New Zealand Drama School.

Comment by adramyttium

May 2nd 2008 08:33
I'm Kael, i decided to register, hah. Yeah, I tend to like movies most people might hate, doesn't bother me though. I can like or hate a movie for the strangest reasons.... As for the rest of your blog, I haven't gotten the chance to dig too deep as of yet, I do plan on it though, I like reading reviews, even if I've already seen the film, I still want to know where others stand on it. But with the reading up on lycanthropy, There are some good reads out there, oddly enough, some of my favorite has been from the book i told you about in a previous comment, the World of Darkness game book, Werewolf the Forsaken. It has a whole list of references and resources listed in its index, as well as a list of the best werewolf movies and books you can find. Another one that has some interesting historical facts, but is pretty much useless otherwise is called "The Werewolf Book" i believe. I'll need some time to think of more, but I will be sure to get back to you with plenty of resources on it.

Comment by Claws of night

May 6th 2008 02:19
I am gonna have to vote for werewolves because after a long time they gain control of their actions or if a man/woman puts on (or takes off in some legends) a wolf strap/belt he/she will instantly transform into a werewolf with full control of their actions and if he/she takes the strap or belt and takes it back off (or puts it back on) they will return to their true form again and they can do this whenever they want!!!!!

Comment by Bryn

May 6th 2008 03:28
Claws .... intriguing.

Comment by miss America

May 7th 2008 21:10
BULLCRAP they do gain self controll if anything they lose self controll because the power they have starts to go to thare head and they don't know what theyr doing.

Comment by Bryn

May 8th 2008 00:19
... and so the claws and fangs clash once again! This is a great battle indeed!

Comment by EdLincoln

May 8th 2008 19:12
Well, if you look at the older legends, it seems that when you become a vampire, the original "you" is erased and replaced by a monster. This is also the case in Buffy. So in one sense the vampire is totally not i8n control, because the human mind is dead and gone, not in control of anything. In another sense, the vampire is totally in control, because this new entity that is occupying there body is doing exactly what it wants.

Werewolves, on the other hand, contain the original human mind, and a chaotic animal mind that do battle. The human is more in control in a werewolf, because there is a human mind to be in control.

Why is it that in nearly any fantasy or horror where there are both vampires and werewolves, the vampires are more powerful?

I tend to think vampires are overdone. Werewolves have suffered from bad movie adaptations with "wolfmen" who are humans in makeup. Werewolves that actually turn into wolves are cooler.

Comment by Bryn

May 9th 2008 02:25
Ed, I like your school of thought, cheers!

Comment by Anonymous

May 9th 2008 04:16
srry to say this guys but vamprie dont drink all the blood in a human and they dont grow fangs, they use there fingernails on the person's leg or arm and take a few drops evey other week or 2 . think about if they did drink all the blood and bite the neck people would know there were actually vampire so instead they hide their identity and only take a little at a time. also a stake through the heart would kill anyone. and becuse they aren;t evil holy water and crosses dont affect them grlic only gives them stincky breath although their sense of smell is greater then a humans they smell worse then they do for us and think about it when we smell the smell from a thing of garilc it stinks as it is. So i dont think vampires r evil so i will go with the vampires.

Comment by Bryn

May 9th 2008 04:38
Anon, so I'm gathering you think werewolves are evil ... how so?

Comment by Anonymous

May 10th 2008 18:06
a cold wind blows outside my door,
the autumn full moon shines to confirm control.
the beast claws out from deep within,
my want succeeds my will and once again.
this ain't no myth,no fairy tale.
my scream becomes the howl i know to well.

now change my life from all i'v known,
and find the beast that hinds in my sole,
so then i'll find new truths strong and in my youth,
and take me where the werewolves roam.

Comment by Anonymous

May 10th 2008 18:11
does anyone know about any games with werewolves or vampires

Comment by Bryn

May 11th 2008 02:20
Anon, great poem, yours?

(other) Anon, no I don't, but would love to play one. Perhaps I should create one ..... Hmmmm.

Comment by Anonymous

May 12th 2008 05:05
I always sided with the werewolfs. I love animals and thought they were much more tough than those whimpy vampires. I have now discovered I am half vampire. Please visit my website, by the way, and take some vampire and werewolf tests to find out if you are one. I am on the vampires side now. Here are my human and vampire charactaristics for anyone who's interested: Human: Is Christian, loves garlic, doesn't really have cool powers, can't transform, doesn't drink other people's blood, can't fly. Vampire: Drinks own blood and loves it, has super-quick reflexes and can sense stuff, where's black, prefers cool temperatures even though likes sun, has small fangs and sharp, long fingernails/claws.

Comment by Bryn

May 12th 2008 06:33
Anon/Jake, Where do you go on your site to find out if you're a vampire or werewolf?

Comment by Anonymous

May 13th 2008 00:21
you cant use my website to do that yet but if u go to ehow.com, type in vampire test, then one of the adds shuld be the vampire test. Tell me if that doesnt work.

Comment by Anonymous

May 13th 2008 00:26
ok sorry about that last comment but IT IS WRONG. Just click this link to find out if u are a vampire or whatever. Really Long Link

Comment by Anonymous

May 14th 2008 11:00
I personally have to side with werewolves. I've never really understood why people don't like them; isn't there something impossibly cool about turning into a wolf? A bat, after all, is only a puny, mouse-like thing with wings. Also, (and depending on your seriousness (it's not a word, I know -.-) you might automatically discredit anything I've said after this) I once roleplayed a werewolf on a site where they were human by day, but could choose to turn into wolves at night in order to hunt. Except, of course, when the full moon was in the sky, at which point they became those uncontrolled lupine equivalents of Arnold Schwarzenegger so often portrayed in popular literature. I joined as a werewolf because all that '*purr* Why hello, my dear' has always been far too detached for me. It's a whole lot more fun playing a character which is all down to earth and rough and ready than one of those ladeda toffs vampires always seem to be.

Plus, I've met my fair share of bloodthirsty, ugly male werewolf characters on forums, but I've also met cold, beautiful female alpha werewolves, and sexy wolf babes involved in tempestuous, often forbidden relationships with humans, and rogue werewolves roaming NYC looking for trouble, etc. It's all so earthy and involved, you know? Being an all-knowing, seductive, killer vamp is all very nice, but it's so boring. x.x

Then again, that's just my opinion. I've never actively, seriously researched creatures of the night. So yah.

Comment by lone wolf

May 14th 2008 17:43
which one has more controle we may never know. but if the two were two fight i wold have to go with the dog-man weres are all brute power and savage instinct while vamps are cuning but have no muscle. And for every one that says vamps have sex apeel think about how chiseled the were wolf is now dream about that

Comment by Bryn

May 15th 2008 00:35
Anon, great comments, I'm with you there ... howl!!

lone wolf, dog-man bow wow wow!

Comment by Claws of night

May 16th 2008 02:23
About the games if you go to battleon.com and play adveturequest, once your level 5 you can go to darkovia forest and become a werewolf, vampire or if i you pay the gaurdian or X-gaurdian fee you can become half-vampire, half-werewolf!!!!!

Comment by Anonymous

May 27th 2008 16:31
Your text goes hereYour text goes here
I am a fellow werewolf believer. I think that there are werewolves and vampires are still around. Is this true?

Comment by Bryn

May 28th 2008 01:09
Anon ... I dunno, you tell me owwwwww!!!

Comment by Anonymous

June 4th 2008 16:10
Im just going to point out this about Werewolfs and Vampire Weaknesses.First of all Vampires can not be killed with all types of wood,second of all Werewolfs
can be killed with the substance mercury as well as
silver.
Also there are two types of werewolfs one which to me is common is spiritual a wolf spirt lives along with a human spirt this causes a mental shift where the person takes on the aspect of the wolf this one is control able. The second is the one protrayed in many movies and books.

Comment by Anonymous

June 4th 2008 16:32
I am the same Anon above I am NOT a Were Wolf
But a human with a dragon spirt.

Im am ten .

I hope that should point out any questions.

Comment by Anonymous

June 4th 2008 16:52
Same Anon above.
I side with Were wolfs because in human form they can use that time to use to the werewolfs advantige
for example a can pelt him self in garlic with is one of the vampires weaknesses.Also werewolfs can chase a vampire if the werewolf get in range.The vampires cances are slim to none. While if a vampire plays his cards right the werewolf will end up in some form of vampire torture.

Comment by Bryn

June 5th 2008 04:44
Anon, are you really ten years old? I had no idea my blog was being read and commented on by ten year olds ... The mind boggles.

Comment by Anonymous

June 6th 2008 15:38
Yes I am ten.

Comment by Bryn

June 6th 2008 17:18
How did you find my blog? I'm curious ...

Comment by Anonymous

June 8th 2008 01:30
I spend most of my days sick.I search stuff like vampire,werewolf,undead,werec reature...ect.
So I found my way onto your site.

Comment by Bryn

June 8th 2008 03:58
Sorry to hear that you're ill, hope you recover soon. Howl on brother of the moon ...

Comment by nightwolf

June 9th 2008 09:26
aww c'mon we werewolves arent that bad we are not like you think we are we are more loving, loyale, and fun, the vampires on the other hand are cold blooded and they wouldnt give a rats ass what you guys think about them you may think their nice but in the end they turn around and bite you in the ass.

Comment by Anonymous

June 10th 2008 03:33
Damo is awesome.....we like you and vampires are cooler...The End.

Comment by moe

June 10th 2008 06:06
aight well can see every 1 is saying dat vamps are sexy and they are more in control but has evry 1 forgoten dat they only seem like dat remember wen dey get ma their face gets all deformed and ugly pluse they might be a bit more in control but not that much more they cant go without drinking blood 4 2 long and on the subject on who's mor scary i got 2 say the werewolf cuz i mean lets be real it would be way more scary getin chased by a 7 foot tall 300 pound man wolf with 6inched k-9s than some homo long haired lookin guy and the girl they can bite me when ever they want lol and as 4 bein evil dat 1 gose 2 da vamps cuz really there are harly any movies that i know of bout good vamps and if u know somtin bout were wolf history u would know that were wolf fought 4 god agienst wicthes and that the whole vampier thing has 2 do with the devil and my last point if u were a werewolf atleast you could try 2 have some kind of life during the day as where if u were a vamp u would have 2 be in a coffin all day

Comment by Anonymous

June 10th 2008 23:03
Ancient Werewolf Chant Adapted from Songs of Russian People

In the ocean sea on the island Buyan,
in the open plain,
shines the moon upon an aspen stump,
into the green wood,into the spreading
vale.
Around the stump goas a shaggy wolf;
under his teeth are all the horned cattle;
but into the wood the wolf does not;
in the vale the wolf not roam.
Moon,moon! Gold horned moon!
Melt the bullet,blult the knife,rot the
cudgel,
strike fear into man,beast, and reptile,
so that they may not sieze the gray wolf,
nor tear from his warm hide.
My word is firm, fimer than sleep
or the strength of heroes.
This was not writen by me.

Comment by Bryn

June 11th 2008 00:58
Hey ten-yr-old anon, you should come up with an online name for yourself and register with Orble, then choose an avatar image for yourself as well.

Comment by Talon

June 11th 2008 05:59
Werewolves

werewolves are only changed by the moon the first time or two...

we blend in easily with the society of humans...

the homeless are not noticed when missing....

the cold ones cannot escape the fire ...whether by light or by claw and fang....

which wins in a fight to the death : A calculating superhuman that wastes time planning or an angry human that has given himself to the wild so he doesnt have to think only do..with lethal efficiancy

VAMPIRES...ARE....NEARLY... EXTINCT...

We lycan thropes are thriving!!!!!!!




(post comment.)

Comment by Aubernight Windseeker

June 11th 2008 17:07
Im the ten year old .


Also about werewolfs weeknesses
they have regeneterave abilities witch means that
gun fire will not nessasarily stop it once "killed"
it must be burned.


Comment by Anonymous

June 12th 2008 17:29
As power goes, I think werewolves come out on top. While vampires can turn into bats and wolves, they have more weaknesses: sunlight, holy water, crucifixes, garlic, stakes, etc. Werewolves, however can only be killed with silver (or in the case of the loup-garou, with fire). And have you ever heard of a vampire destroying houses and villages? It seems to me like werewolves cause more destruction and chaos.

Comment by Bryn

June 12th 2008 23:20
Great comments everyone ... I love that this argument continues to fire up debate! OWWWWW!!!

Comment by Talon

June 14th 2008 00:37
p.s. unless werewolfs stop changing for about 50yrs then they will not age. which is scarier
vamp: im going to suck your blood

or

were:ragrsgrargarsgasgr (im going to tear your limb from limb and eat your dead body!!!!)

Comment by SilverFang

June 16th 2008 01:08
Personally I like wolves a lot. Im gonna have to go with Were-wolves cause of a few points:

1. In terms of control, who would you choose?
A pale white undead guy that knows what he's doing and loves it? Or a creature of the night that is unaware of what he does, and is often innocent?

2. In terms of ingenuity, vamps rely too much on weaponry while wolves are adaptable. Wolves use their own specialities, and anything in front of them to attack.

3. In terms of weakness, Wolves win cause in a Vamp-Wolf war, the wolves can wait for day and then stab the sleeping vamps or pull them out into the sun. Also, the materials needed for killing vamires are easily found while pure silver is actually really rare these days, unless youre in a museum. Wolfsbane is hard to get as well.

4. In terrms of raw power, we all know anyway that werewolves are pretty much living raw power themselves, while vamps are just youre stronger than average human.

5. As for sexuality, well... some she-werewolves are sure to be hot at day right, plus the fact they wont attack you since its day. while she-vamps are hot, (NOT ALL!) they might as well drain you on the spot if they see you strutting around at night.

Comment by Q

June 16th 2008 13:50
i had a dream i turned into a werewolf. pretty bad ass dream.

Comment by SilverFang

June 17th 2008 08:26
woah... im kinda jealous

Comment by SilverFang

June 18th 2008 02:23
the time will come... when the wolf howl runs this earth...
the time will come... when humanity belongs to the wild...
the time will come... when savage fury is the only emotion...
the time will come... when power is the only path to live...
the time will come... when thy true self awakens... when the beast within is released...
the time will come... when the werewolves will rule this world...

Comment by Anonymous

June 19th 2008 14:21
werewolves. they just kick ass. plain and simple

Comment by SilverFang

June 20th 2008 09:22
hahaha... ryt... nyce nd simple... but i ly kto make it a bit formal... but yeah... your way works too.. ^^
WEREWOLVES KICK VAMPIRES ASS!!!

Comment by Anonymous

July 8th 2008 17:38
i think the werewolf hands down would always win against a vampire
the movie van helsing come-on now
when he turnd into a werewolf he ripped the junk out of dracula
werewolves will always be top dog no matter what
i would probably like having a vamp chick cause they sexier...but i would rather be a werewolf cause its not a trick its straight out fear from the moment you see the size fur teeth and claws its straight up fear and horror
WEREWOLVES FOR THE WIN
GOGOOGO


Comment by Kiana_night_winds

July 22nd 2008 04:58
Your text goes hereI believe werewolves are soemthing more terrifying then vamps. You can see a vamp dive for your blood....but a werewolf hides in the shadows...crazily running wild for not only blood but your whole body. They are in control of what they are doing....the know how to get you. And an oversized wolf would be super powerful...large claws to peel through your skin with one swipe and oversized fangs to tear you to peices. Incredible speeds and bone chilling howels. How could you think a bloodsucking leech could beat this? and just to clue you in on something...no vampires are not immortal. They can die just like werewolves can.

Comment by Bryn

July 22nd 2008 06:14
cheers Kiana ... diggin' the violet scrawl too

Comment by Aubernight Windseeker

July 25th 2008 01:54
There is a way way to cure a werewolf without killing it ....
an iron knife slash it three times in the head the curse
is lifted so one more salution instead of being eaten.

Comment by Bryn

July 25th 2008 03:06
Aubernight, curious, where did you learn of that antidote?

Comment by Aubernight Windseeker

July 25th 2008 18:37
Very long research

Comment by Bryn

July 26th 2008 07:41
I dig that! owwwwww!!!

Comment by Anonymous

August 6th 2008 19:50
well you cant forget the much much much later version of the vampire called a "daywalker" which makes them more so better than a werewolf also if i read correctly the vampire doesnt HAVE to drink human blood to survive just blood will do it as the werewolf dosent HAVE to rip the daggum insides out of a human (or anything for that matter) to survive it can wait to eat normal food later so both make the choise but the vampire has to have blood OF SOME KIND to survive and i guess like any hunter would agree (me being one) human blood would be more of a challenge to get so more fun to attain.....plus you have to remember that both are very animalistic in ways so there thought process is not like the human they once were....any questions email me at thebatnoise4ever@aol.com (be sure to put this topic in the subject bar)

Comment by Anonymous

August 6th 2008 20:13
same guy from the "daywalker" post also remember there are tales of a rare clan of vampire that can only be killed by a werewolf and i also read that a werewolf can be killed vise versa so seeing as both have in human stregth and speed it is just a mater that the vampire has more control over it's body than a werewolf and would get the bite quicker

Comment by Silverfang

August 7th 2008 10:48
I disagree cuz a werewolf is much more beastly, more brutal, muscular, and agile, w/c means that the werewolf cant get a bite w/o getting bitten first. Also, Ive read about a sort of werewolf that has actually control over its transformation and intelligence. This can be an advantage, especially during daytime. And, Ive also read of another werewolf breed that has fur that's preety much like a porcupine's, only sharper and harder. Pretty hard to bite right?!

WOLVES RULE!!!!

Comment by Anonymous

August 7th 2008 22:38
not argueing the types of werewolves but the body make up of a werewolf makes it have less muscular control and the simetry (i know i spelled that wrong) of a vampire and plus a vampire dosnt have to "get used" to the "new" body make it receives the muscular system though in humanly strong still remanes the same

Comment by Kiana_night_winds

August 9th 2008 11:02
Saying that the werewolf is in less control of its body only makes it scarier....the normal ones everyone learns about shows them changing into crazy beast attacking whatever they see maybe out of being scared or just wanting to kill. The vampire is in control of their so called "powers" and chooses who their victims are a werewolf just attacks (the normal ones). And their make up is much more terrifying r then the vampires. The vampire is basically just a stronger human with the same intellect as us but a werewolf has both human and wolf strength making it almost defeatable if it was a fair fight no weapons of a sort between and werewolf and a human we all know whose gonna win. And the ones that can change on their own and are in control of their powers are just as terrifying. A Vampire has blood sucking fangs and claws and is a bit stronger then a human. But a werewolf is over muscled, long fangs for ripping things apart, claws for the also ripping things up and for help in getting speed when their running, high speeds, and alot more wolf like features. And yes some are not the rip you up kind of wolves but they still have the same features of the rip you up kind. And yes some vampires do not drink human blood but they will still want it or like the fun of chasing it. I still believe the werewolf is the best and most terrifying. But seeing as this debate is about which is more in control of their dark side i would say Vampires are more in control......but werewolves are still the best, strongest, terrifyingest, all time awesomest mythical creature there is!!!!! and i have no doubt about that.

Comment by Aubernight Windseeker

August 11th 2008 02:19
I have two things that will shed some more light on the vampire 2good 1bad

Bad goes first a vampire has a weakness a vampire
will count spilled seeds no matter what situation until
it finishes count or the sun comes up

Good : Some vampires can control fire,ice,water
,lightning,or earth acording to some of the older legends
and some can control normal wolfs and rats.

Comment by Bryn

August 11th 2008 03:16
Kiana, I'm with you there ...

Comment by JessCee

August 13th 2008 03:18
I've always been a big vampire fan.

Sure, werewolves are cool in their own unique way. They can change into an animal—awesome. But honestly, they’re stuck with this curse that forces them to change every full moon, leaving them no choice but to evolve into this...monster... that kills because their animal instinct takes over everything else. Kudos goes to the few that actually want it. Though, Wolfsbane, made a good point that even though werewolves can’t always control their actions, they have an immeasurable amount of love and loyalty for their mate and pack-- more than any vampire or human could ever come close to.

I’m not saying that all vampires have more control—in some cases they don’t. The thing that has always made me want to be a vampire is the way they roam the night with such confidence and mystery...it just makes them more ominous, and as if you want to get to know them more... almost as if you [i[want[/i] to follow them down the dark alley way. They also have immortality-- the chance to live forever and see everything that the world evolves into. Supernatural strength, good looks, and pale, gorgeous skin is just a plus. The downside is that they can never truly love someone as much as a human could. Their relationships are based purely off of lust, not love.



Comment by Bryn

August 13th 2008 03:21
JessCee,
great comments!
The vamps in 30 Days of Night aren't of the good-looking variety in their natural guise, though.

Comment by JessCee

August 13th 2008 03:32
Bryn,
Thanks! It took me a while to come up with some decent points, though.

That's true. I really liked 30 Days of Night actually. The vampires in that particular film are more... the wild, vicious...man-eating...I-Don' t-Give-A-Crap-Who-I-Kill-Or-W ho-Witnesses...type.

It's interesting to see the different ways people portray vampires.

Personally, I prefer the vampires that try to conceal their true nature so they can blend in with society.

Comment by Bryn

August 13th 2008 06:34
JessCee,
Yeah, 30 Days is one of the best vampire flicks in years. My father acted in it. He's the old codger who gets killed at the beginning and his head put on a stick! Go dad!!!
Other vampire movies I really like are Innocent Blood (aka A French Vampire in America), Near Dark, The Addiction, Martin, Vampire's Kiss, Nosferatu (both the 1922 and the 1979 versions) and From Dusk Till Dawn.
... but I'm particularly fond of lycanthropes.


Comment by Bryn

August 13th 2008 06:35
btw, JessCee, you should find yourself a cool avatar

Comment by Silverfang

August 13th 2008 09:44
Hmmm... im a werewolf fan, but JessCee I see your point. However, remember that immortality has a big price. If, say you were mortally wounded, such as having a wound that will never heal, then you're doomed to suffer forever, unless you kill yourself, or you get killed. Also, imagine the pain if all your friends were dead, or they're old, and that they have paradise in heaven to look forward to, while you just damned yourself to hell...

Comment by JessCee

August 13th 2008 13:17
Bryn,
Wow, thats awesome that your dad was in the movie! That would be such an amazing experience, and I'll have to check out some of those movies you mentioned. I haven't seen some of them. Haha, I'm actually looking up some avatars now.

Silverfang,
That's a really good point. It would be hard to live without your loved ones, or to see them moving on in life-- going to bigger and better things while you're stuck, pretty much frozen in the life you've been given...


Comment by Wolfsbane

August 13th 2008 17:03
I totally agree with SilverFang and JessCee. Personally, I would hate to be immortal, never to see ur family or love ones 'in the great beyond' or watever is next after death. that's why I think werewolves are lucky. Their suffering can actually end when they die, no matter how long it takes.
vampires may have amazing confidence and not skulk around like the werewolf, but that sympathy and self-loathing, I think, is actually kinda attractive. some people want to help others who they think are in need, to help them get over their fears, or self-judgment.

now, srry, to get back on subject. A werewolf is only a monster once a month, while a vampire has to fight the bloodlust, 'day' and night. I bet they dream about it when they sleep during the hours the sun is up. Werewolves have better senses than any animal on the earth. Vampires may have the amazing senses as well, but 'wolves can actually use their's for good when they are human. I believe since being a werewolf is a curse, shouldn't the curse kinda affect u as a human? Werewolves could be like an anti-hero like Batman, tormented but stilll trying to do good to try and counter their dark side.

Comment by Wolfsbane

August 13th 2008 17:08
okay. srry that last comment wasnt really on subject.

i think neither are in control, though werewolves perhaps a bit more. as human, they are. They just hahve to take precautions at night or when the full moon is out.
any counters on that?

Comment by Silverfang

August 13th 2008 23:30
I don't counter that Wolfsbane. Remember, that in one of my aruments, there's a particluar breed of werewolf, called a wulver, that has total control over itself. It is not the curse that forces the wolf to kill, and neither is the vamp a killer. It is their own decision to be killers. A werewolf, in my opinion, is the physical manifestation of the person's true self, w/c means that all of that person's true colors are revealed. A werewolf can kill, but it can also protect. There's a novel about a wulver (werewolf), called "Hunting Season", where the werewolf is a father, and he protects his son from the werewolf that bit him, then takes the child far away, leaving him, so as not to burden the child with the knowledge that his father isnt human anymore. In the Darren Shan novels, vampires hide from humans, and are more realistic. They don't kill, they just take small amounts of blood and go find another host. Which means that both vamp and wolf do have control. They both just need DISCIPLINE...
As the Hunter says in "Hunting Season" :
It is not the Wolf, but the man taht makes the wolf evil...

Comment by Wolfsbane

August 14th 2008 00:11
how many types of werewolves are there? I only know of the one who changes @ the full moon. and how many kinds of vampires?

it is true that humans bring the worst out in animal species. thats why u see hippos attack people, or lions, or wolves... we are feared.

see, werewolves aren't 'dead', not like the vampires. so don't you think that that would help them control their dark side, b/c they are still techincally human, so they have human emotions like compassion or fear?

Comment by Silverfang

August 14th 2008 04:16
The wulver doesn't change at the full moon, but at will. There's also a werewolf that's permanently in wolf form, day and night. The curse becomes permanent after the 3rd full moon. There's everyones standard werewolf, but I don't have to explain do I? There's a TRUE werewolf, a mix of wolf and man blood in his/her veins since birth. This one is really dangerous, with strange, wiry, sharp fur, and has lost it's sanity due to the mix of blood. Apart from those, I don't know any more breeds.

As for dark sides, everything has a darkside. A vamp is undead, but technically, it's alive because it moves, breathes, and feeds. A wolf is truly alive, it's just cursed. Humans not only bring out the darkside of animals, but of anything. Humans will bring this out, willingly, unwillingly, on purpose, or accidentally. Sometimes, these darksides naturally emerge, or just lie dormant. However, in my belief, it is us that gives something a darkside, simply because we are afraid of it. A vamp, or a werewolf, are considered dark, simply because of the fact that many treat them as freaks of nature, that they are not human. The exceptions usually survive in encounter with said vamp or wolf, because they accepted the person as an equal, with living rights, and not as a thing to be feared and shunned.
Sorry, off the topic... =P
Controlling the darkside is all about DISCIPLINE... It doesn't matter whether it's a vamp, wolf, or something else entirely. As long as it doesn't give in to it's darkside, one doesn't need to fear it.

Comment by Bryn

August 14th 2008 06:25
Fantastic comments everyone!
This is by far my most popular post!

Comment by VampyreJ

August 14th 2008 09:54
I have to vote vampires, because they often chose to be the way they are, and are completly consious the whole time, so they know what they're doing when they do it. Where there may be the vampires that kill, rape, and feed just for the fun of it, there are those out there that are sensual, caring, gentle, and only feed from those that allow them to. Another point towards them is that they look almost normal, and (in my personal opinion) the fangs and often corsets, boost their sexuality by far, whereas werewolves are covered by fur in their transformed state, which is... not so attractive. Now, as far as brute strength is concerned, yes, werewolves win, but power isn't everything is it? They can also fly which, aside from being very cool, can be used for various tactical reasons, avoidance, attacking, stealth, etc. So, bottomline, vampires have several advantages that werewolves don't.

Comment by Wolfsbane

August 14th 2008 15:21
but it's not about being sensual or caring or power, it's if they are in control... I don't think they would be. once they have smelt or tasted blood, the vampire wouldn't be able to control itself. blood is what they live for, it's how they survive. how could u control urself with that in your mouth and the smell in your nose? i know I probably couldn't...

Comment by werewolf

August 15th 2008 17:21
i know for a fact that both are strong and can be good or evil equally it just is how you look at it not to mension that i am a werewolf and i get along just fine with a vampire no i done like her but i do tolerrate her just as she does me.

Comment by JessCee

August 16th 2008 01:38
Your points are all so good. I can't reply to them right now, because I need to go. I will later, though.

Comment by Wolfsbane

August 17th 2008 05:32
so what's it like being a werewolf? Stereotypical? or does the media completely give you guys a bad name?

Comment by Silverfang

August 17th 2008 08:45
Guys look at it this way. Why do you have to argue about sexiness? Beauty doesn't matter if it's gonna kill you. And anyway, aren't werewolves a sort of ferocious beauty themselves?
And as for thoes other points. A werewolf can also be caring, especially to people they are familiar to...

Comment by Bryn

August 18th 2008 04:34
Silverfang, I love that description "Ferocious beauty"

Comment by werewolf

August 18th 2008 16:58
totally bad name we can be just like other people except we are very protective lol we dont hate vampires as much as you would think either we can be extremely civil if anyone wants to ask any other questions for me e-mail me at arnoxicon@live.com

thanx all

Comment by Silverfang

August 19th 2008 10:38
I agree... Doesn't mean someone doesn't look good to you means they're bad right?! They're not bad... People just make them look bad out of fear... Werewolves aren't a freak of nature, they're a furious, raging manifestation of the beauty of true nature itself!!!

Comment by Anonymous

August 19th 2008 18:29
thankyou for the description silverfang extremely good comments lol its good to know there are smart humans out there

Comment by Anonymous

August 20th 2008 01:28
Darkness... Everything has a dark side, which has been stated more than once here. I am fascinated by both, the vampire and the werewolf, and have been since I was a kid. I heard, although I don't remember who said it, "that power does not corrupt a man, it define him." So would this not also be true for which of the two has more control?

A werewolf has enhance animal instincts, given this, I would say they would be in more control. Just because we feeble humans cannot comprehend why a dog will eat the couch, does not mean it is not in control of it's actions. The same I would think is true of a werewolf.

A vampire has to have all the blood removed from the body, or bitten 3 times and said to die, but for how long? The blood is replaced in the body right? So who is to say that the body is not just in a state of suspended animation? Once again the control, they are now a human with new strengths and weakness. The weakness I would think are easy to remember and avoid, if possible. But the strengths would be new, I would not think they come with instincts to control them. But once they learn I believe control comes. And if they make sure they are fully satisfied hunger wise they would be in control.

In short I think that both can gain complete control over themselves, but while new the vampire has less because I would not think instincts are implanted to help learn how to control some of their changes.

Now mind you I prefer the vampire, I would so love to be able to see where the world is going. I think it would be fascinating to see what it will be like in a hundred years and more. Plus, I love the night and it has nothing to do with the supernatural. The stars, the sounds, smells.....everything!

Comment by Wolfsbane

August 20th 2008 01:59
I love werewolves, as you can tell from my name and my arguments. I think what you're saying is very true Anonymous. After a while, they both would have control, but which one would have more?

I think I'm drawn to the fact that werewolves can change shape, even if it is against their will, but wolves are one of my favourite animals, have been since I was very little. And they live an abnormally long life, so they too could see the world grow and change. but they aren't cursed with immortality as far as I know, so when their loved ones pass on, they know they will see them again. When they are done with living, they know that death is an option. Their regenerative(sp?) power is pretty incredible. and to go out in sunlight! Is it true that their blood is quite warm, b/c if so, imagine what you could do in winter?

ahh, the endless possibilities, even with the full moon as a down side.

Comment by Bryn

August 20th 2008 02:02
I wasn't aware that werewolves were cursed with immortality like vampires ....

Comment by Silverfang

August 20th 2008 07:43
No.... in fact... they have shorter livespans as far as i know...

Comment by werewolf

August 20th 2008 19:58
no we have the same life span until we stop changeing into wolf form thats when we grow old

Comment by PurRot

August 20th 2008 20:02
I am the anonymous from the 20th Aug,

I have heard different things whether they are immortal, just long lived, regular, and shorter life spans. It seems like people can not figure out what to think. I would believe that they are shorter because they are so...violent, I guess is the word.

Later when both have control over their new powers, I would think the vampire would have more control. A vampire is not fighting another set of instincts.

Comment by Wolfsbane

August 22nd 2008 14:23
I would've thought that they lived for a very long time b/c of their regenerative power, unless they don't have it. But as the legends and stories go, werewolves can heal themselves very quickly.

good point PurRot.

Comment by Huge Werewolf Fan

August 28th 2008 12:32
For me I pull for the underdog, err wolf. More in control of his darkside, unless it's that time of the month!!!!

Now here is why I feel the dogs are the better of the two villains:
Some ARE immortal (Underworld, The Howling, Werewolf the TV series 1989 Fox)
They start out with no control, typically, and can change at will as the beast takes over.
Eventually the beast controls the man, which is the nature of the curse
Wolf women? How about The Howling??? And yes I do mean the nymphomaniac! SHE was hot! As was Ginger (Ginger Snaps) and her sister (Ginger Snaps 2).
You only see what you allow yourself to see.

And yes, The Company of Wolves is a GREAT film...love the part where Angela Lansbury loses her head...

Recommended cinema:
Werewolf the TV series, 1989, Fox (sold to USA in the 90's I think, only one season ran, but MAN was it good)
An American Werewolf in London, 1981
The Howling, 1981
Howling 2 (your sister is a werewolf), 1983
DOG SOLDIERS, 2002
Ginger Snaps, 2001
Ginger Snaps Unleashed, 2004
Ginger Snaps Back, 2007
The Monster Squad, 1985

Comment by Huge Werewolf Fan

August 28th 2008 12:44
For me I pull for the underdog, err wolf. More in control of his darkside, unless it's that time of the month!!!!

Now here is why I feel the dogs are the better of the two villains:
Some ARE immortal (Underworld, The Howling, Werewolf the TV series 1989 Fox)
They start out with no control, typically, and can change at will as the beast takes over.
Eventually the beast controls the man, which is the nature of the curse
Wolf women? How about The Howling??? And yes I do mean the nymphomaniac! SHE was hot! As was Ginger (Ginger Snaps) and her sister (Ginger Snaps 2).
You only see what you allow yourself to see.

And yes, The Company of Wolves is a GREAT film...love the part where Angela Lansbury loses her head...

Recommended cinema:
Werewolf the TV series, 1989, Fox (sold to USA in the 90's I think, only one season ran, but MAN was it good)
An American Werewolf in London, 1981
The Howling, 1981
Howling 2 (your sister is a werewolf), 1983
DOG SOLDIERS, 2002
Ginger Snaps, 2001
Ginger Snaps Unleashed, 2004
Ginger Snaps Back, 2007
The Monster Squad, 1985

Recommended literature (vampire & werewolf here)
The Wolf's Hour - Robert R. McCammon
Necroscope - Brian Lumley
Vamphri! Necroscope II - Brian Lumley
The Source: Necroscope III - Brian Lumley
Deadspeak: Necroscope IV - Brian Lumley
Deadspawn: Necroscope V - Brian Lumley
Blood Brothers: Necroscope VIII - Brian Lumley
The Last Aerie: Necroscope IX - Brian Lumley
I cannot for the life of me remember what Necroscope X is called...but READ IT!
Dracula - Bram Stoker (Unabridged if you can find it)
The Werewolf's Tale - Richard Jaccoma
The Werewolf's Revenge - Richard Jaccoma
Anyway, I can't remember any more right away, but I'm sure sooner or later I will because I love these types of literature!
And I skipped Necroscope VI and VII because frankly in those Lumley pretty much confirms his main character's suspicions that werewolves and vampires are the same species of creature, just the manner of their infection differs. Besides that, it's just a space filler between Vamphri and The Source (Called The Lost Years, there are 2 books but they should have been one as they are a continual literation unlike the rest)

Comment by Huge Werewolf Fan

August 28th 2008 13:34
[LINK=http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3893264/Werewolf_(1987)_(TV)_(FOX)_1x02_-_1x05_DVD_-_A_Time-Capsule_Rele">Really Long Link[/LINK]

A link to the legendary TV series WEREWOLF, from 1987...my year was off

Comment by Wolfsbane

August 29th 2008 13:58
I'm looking forward to the new 'The Wolf Man' movie coming out next year. Remake of the original.

Comment by PurRot

September 8th 2008 05:44
While you wait, there are a lot of good books out nowadays. Unfortunately, most are found in the romance sections. I am not a fan of romance but the plots in some of these books are really neat, so that section in my book case is growing.

Comment by Bryn

September 8th 2008 06:09
PurPot, have you read any of the Anita Blake, Vampire Hunter series? If so, any good? Some of them deal with werewolves ...

Comment by PurRot

September 8th 2008 16:26
Yes, I have. I really enjoy them. Right now that is my favorite series. She has all sorts of different types of shifters wolf, lion, tiger, and bear (Oh, my! Sorry couldn't help the cheesey line) The wolves are actually quite prominent in the series at first. Although, some people have stopped reading her books because in the latest series there is sex in them. But, I do not mind, the books are really awesome to me. I believe that there is something for everyone in the Anita Blake series. Give them a try, it is a large series though, so have fun!

Comment by Bryn

September 9th 2008 01:32
I don't mind any sex, as long as it isn't long-winded, and is genuinely erotic as opposed to flowery. Sexual prose can work wonders, but it bogged down the Clan of the Cave BEar series ...

Comment by PurRot

September 9th 2008 16:54
In the Anita series the sex is just about always well written, although I must admit a couple of times she made me blush. Sometimes it is written a bit graphic. Anita is not a soft flowery kind of girl. She is hard as nails. She raises the dead for a living (I think that part is neat how it was written) she gets dragged into the vampires affairs made to solve a crime for them. In true Anita Blake style, she gets even. This series to me is about Anita fighting herself (trying to do the right thing while upholding her morals.) and other to become comfortable in her own skin and her place in life even as her skills/powers are growing and many different groups are trying to take a piece of her and control her for her powers. She also works for the police. This series has become very interesting. A couple books in the later part of the series was a little off to me, but that is because Anita is changing again and I am not sure where Hamilton is taking the series. I just know that I cannot wait for the next book to come. Give this series a try, I was happy that I did.

Comment by Bryn

September 9th 2008 23:48
PurPot, cheers for that ... I'm curious as to how old you are? And what demographic group would you say the Anita Blake books are aimed at?

Comment by PurRot

September 10th 2008 22:34
I am currently 27, you? I would say her books are for just about anyone, but to narrow it down some. Age group because of content would be 18 and up. Anything else would have to rely on open mindedness. I do not know how to analyze a book into those categories to be truthful. If you know a way to guide me on answering this question I would be more than happy to answer it better.

Comment by Bryn

September 11th 2008 02:19
PurPot, cheers for that ... Would you say the novels are geared more for women or men? Are you male or female yourself? From the style of artwork and presentation the books look like they're aimed at the female demographic ...

Comment by PurRot

September 11th 2008 02:46
I am a female. As for which sex I feel they are geared to I would have to say for the women, however, I have observed that about 48% of the men that I know that read, really like this series. Point-in-fact a man is the one that introduced me to this series about two years ago. He was 29 at the time. What about you? How old are you and are you and are you a male or female?

Comment by Bryn

September 11th 2008 05:51
PurRot (sorry for mispelling your alias the last couple of times),
I'd like to read one of the werewolf-orientated novels of hers, can you recommend one?
I'm a guy, closing in on 40, but feeling (and looking, if I don't mind saying) and acting sometimes (!) like I'm about 25 or so. The avatar pic I use for my Horrorphile profile is actually a picture of me taken by my wife (although she was my gf at the time), pretty cool, huh?

Comment by PurRot

September 12th 2008 06:42
Your wife takes very good pictures. I like the shadowing in your avatar pic. Anita Blake series goes in order. To give you just the books that have mostly the werewolves in them might leave you hanging on the plot. But to give you a heads up the third book is the one that starts the werewolf. This is where Anita starts dating the 2nd in command not knowing he is a werewolf until the end of the book. Then in the 6th book there is more werewolves helping her. When someone puts a price on her head and her werewolf boyfriend is one of the people whom help protect her. They really dance in and out of the books. She become the leader of the packs mate and the human servant of the master of the city. She gains her own "pack?" of leopards. She gets her hands unwillingly in all sorts of paranormal pies. I would not advise starting in the middle you would lose much of the plot. I noticed I was a little vague in my answer it is just hard for me to pin point where to begin if you want to begin in the middle of the series. Go to Laurell K. Hamilton's web site she has the excerpts on her web page and also has a better synopsis on her books to try and give you a better understanding of them. She has like 20 some odd books so it is hard for me to write them all out. If you need more detailed information let me know what you are looking for exactly. Anita Blake is not a werewolf herself although she get infected I think in Narcissus In Chains where she starts to carry a "beast." Let me know if this was helpful please.

Comment by Wolfsbane

September 13th 2008 15:33
What other werewolf books/ series do you know of PurRot? It's so hard to come across good ones these days. I'll have to look into the Anita Blake series.

Comment by PurRot

September 14th 2008 00:50
I agree they are hard to come by, that is why I have started writing again. The ones that I have come across seem to have the same basic plot of the species is endangered of extinction and therefore are searching for mates. There are not many that really cover horror and suspense without going into the sterotype of either "I vant to sux uur bload" to GRR GRR Slash Bite Bite silver bullet and goodnight. I am searching for good books myself. But as of yet Anita Blake series helps, there is just not enough for me. A series that has a good plot maybe not what I have my heart set on is Patricia Briggs the Mercy Thompson Novels but she is a fox that was raised by the wolves and the wolves are well integrated into the series. Carrie Vaughn has a series out about a werewolf named Kitty (haha) I don't know what the series is called but the first book is Kitty and the Midnight Hour. She is has an hour of talk radio and help the paranormal community that is unknown to the human realm. Sherilyn Kenyon has her series out, and has shapeshifters in it. Like I said, I am also looking for a good series or even a book here and there. What books or series do you read?

Comment by Anonymous

September 18th 2008 15:53
there is an optional way to become a werewolf you can become one by stabbing a fallen tree with a copper knife and reciting an incantation alone in a forest

you can also kill them by hitting themr the head with a cold iron rod, forcing it to eat salt, making it drink Holy Water (this only works if the werewolf was/is Christian), or submerging it in salt water. All cures are most likely fatal.

Asanbosam:
African vampires that have hooked feet. They drink blood from their victims' thumb.

Bajang:
Malaysian vampires that appear to mortals as skunks. They tend to prey upon the same family for generations, and can be controlled by a sorcerer.

Baobhan Sith:
The Baobhan Sith are the old Scottish form of vampires. They appear as beautiful young women who kill men by dancing with them until the men are too weak to resist their powers.

Ch'ing Shih:
A Chinese vampire that has poisonus breath. One can escape the Ch'ing Shih by spilling rice on the ground; the Ch'ing Shih has a need to count any spilled rice that it comes across.

Dakini:
A type of Tibetan vampire.

Dracul:
Vampires from Austria.

Empusa:
The Empusa are vampires from the Mediterranean region, and are related to incubi and succubi. While they hunt they appear to be beautiful young women. When they have finished feasting on the blood of their victims they turn into hags.

Jaracara:
Jaracara are snake-like vampires from Brazil. They do not drink blood, but instead drink the breast milk of sleeping women.

Khadro:
A type of Tibetan vampire.

Krvopijac:
Vampires from Bulgaria. They are most easily identified by the fact that they have one nostril. In order to destroy a Krvopijac a magician must capture its spirit in a bottle and then burn it.

Kwakiytl:
A type of vampire from North America.

Mulo:
The Mulo are vampires from Serbia. They can travel in sunlight and darkness, and drink not only their victims' blood but their flesh as well.

Muron:
An ancient type of vampire from Wallachia (the old name for Romania).

Nosferatu:
A name for Eastern European vampires.

Ogolgen:
Bohemian vampires.

Strigoi:
Vampires from Romania.

Wampir:
Wampirs come from Russia. They do not use fangs to drink the blood of their victims, but use a special Your text goes herestinger that is located under their tongue. The Wampir can walk around in the daylight, and must be burned in a special way to be killed.

Vampires from India are said to look like old women, but have two heels on each of their feet.
Ways to Kill a Vampire:

Driving a stake through its heart
Shooting it with a silver bullet
Getting it to go into the sun
Decapitating it
Burning it
Drowning it in salt water
Coercing it into a corked bottle and then burning it
Things that will Ward-Off a Vampire:

Christian Cross
Holy Water
Bells
Garlic
Ways to Keep a Vampire in its Grave:

Surrounding the grave with iron filings (or any iron items)
Putting garlic on the grave
Driving nine spindles into the grave three days after the person had died
Putting a fence around the grave
Buring tow on to of the grave
Making a pile of stones on top of the grave
Pouring boiling water onto the grave
Ways to Keep a Corpse from Becoming a Vampire:

Breaking its spine
Putting lard from a hog slaughtered on St. Ignatius' Day onto it
Decapitating it and putting the head in a strange place or destroying it
Disolving the corpse's heart in Vinegar
Putting a stake into its heart
Putting a nail into its skull
Covering the grave with a wild rose bush
Burying it at a crossroads (but onl if it was a suicide victim)
Ways to Become a Vampire:

Being bitten by a vampire
Drinking the blood of a vampire
Being burried with ones mouth open
Comitting suicide and not being buried at a crossroads
Dying excommunicate
Dying unbaptized
Dying while recovering from being a werewolf
Comitting sucide
Dying from a fall off the left side of a wagon
Having a mother who slept with demons

Comment by Bryn

September 25th 2008 05:27
anon, wow, some brilliant historical "facts" there ... muchos gracias!!


Comment by Wolfsbane

September 29th 2008 14:21
Is it not said that vampires have an urge to count? Isn't that why poppy seeds were covered over graves back in the day?

I find that interesting since on Sesame Street since The Count is a parady of Count Dracula, and he loves to count things: bats, cars, whatever. Kind of creepy actually...

Comment by Wolfsbane

September 29th 2008 14:21
Is it not said that vampires have an urge to count? Isn't that why poppy seeds were covered over graves back in the day?

I find that interesting since on Sesame Street the Count is a parady of Count Dracula, and he loves to count things: bats, cars, whatever. Kind of creepy actually...

Comment by Morgul

September 29th 2008 22:46
Well, i'm fascinated by werewolves since i was a little boy! well let me see if you get my point. It's been told from ancient stories that lycans were once slaves, and that is so wrong, i mean who the hell vampires think they are to go like '' oh! we are so beautifull and we are at the top of the world, we can enslave who ever we want because we are verything a human can wish to be, IMORTALS. so werewolves can transform into animals so we keep them as our pets.'' but obviouslly who can control a beast with big claws and supreme and massive thirst for human flesh? NO ONE!!!
And one day the lycans got tired to be pets and started a war with the vampires witch the blood suckers have no chance. The mind of a vampire goes '' they are animals, so we treat them as dogs'', but a mind of a werewolf goes '' vampire means LUNCH'' and thats it the vampires got what they wanted, a CARNAGE!!!
And if they go like ''oh we are imortals, so we are betters than any living human bean walking the earth'' let's keep things this way

Vampires:
- they live and act in a human body as vampires
- they only move at night
-they have to drink blood to survive
-they are weak
Lycans:
- they live and act as werewolves in a two-feet wolf walking
- they can move whenever they want
- they have to feed of course but we are very much stronger than vampires

So if this is war, the blood suckers can take it
Vampires

Comment by HammerOfGod

October 11th 2008 13:04
I'm sure I am going to be covering things that have already been brought up. I'd like to go to the subject of vampires being evil. I think vampires are much like humans capable of both good and evil.

In Interview With The Vampire we encounter Louie who is very distraught at the fact that he must kill, also in the new series True Blood we see vampires that still have very much human traits.

With werewolves again it depends on the film or the author as to if they are immortal or unaware of what they are doing.

remember the tv series Werewolf? kinda cheesy show sort of like The Hulk with fur and teeth. I actually liked it. There we encountered ancient werewolf played by Chuck Connors who was immortal and could change whenever he wanted.

also for those who said there are not hot werewolf women...I take it you've never seen Ginger Snaps

LOL

Comment by HammerOfGod

October 11th 2008 15:58
Ginger Snaps 2 I mean


Comment by Bryn

October 13th 2008 07:20
What does Ginger Snaps 2 have over Ginger Snaps?

Comment by HammerOfGod

October 14th 2008 23:01
actually I meant Ginger Snaps Back, I like it because I like period films

sorry

and for vampires, I may be a elitist, but I really don't care for the vampires of Interview, Buffy,Southern Vampire series, and Twilight.

I like my vampires bad ass Like Christopher Lee's Dracula, John Carpenters Vampire, etc.
What I like about those books , is they give the vampires human emotions and feelings, but they've really watered down the powers and ferocity of the vampires.

I'm actually working on a vampire novel(I record in on tape and my wife types, good thing because I hate spell check LOL, as you can tell from my posts)

My vampires are a bit different, they can move around in day light with sun glasses because their eyes are very sensative to sun light.They can eat and drink food and liquids(though they need blood from a live human to survive) They can not shape shift or turn into mist, but the have super human strength, speed, agility, hearing, smell, sight, and are still immortal. they can not fly though are able to jump great distances and have the power of suggestion.

My "hero" is a ancient vampire detective/assassin who is sent by the elders to investigate and deal with a situation where an old vampire(the only ones capable of turning) is turning people and leaving them with out instructing and educating them(a capital offense in my vampire universe}. These new vampires, not knowing how to use their powers correctly and were never told that they can not kill humans if it's not called for. are basically going on a killing spree.

Comment by Silverfang

October 14th 2008 23:59
Long time since I posted eh? Ive just read a few good comments and I should say it's really a good argument... Yea... and I discovered another new breed of lycan ^^ I described 3 or 4 last time I think... Anyway... the new breed is a type of vigilante wolf... They have senses that can smell a person's soul... And the scent of a bad soul drives them mad to kill that person... The only thing is... They're in full wolf form, but really big... And the werewolf itself can control the transformation during full-moon... cool eh?

Comment by Bryn

October 15th 2008 00:54
HammerofGod,
I haven't seen Ginger Snaps Back ... Same actors??
Have you seen Abel Ferrara's The Addiction?
That presents vampirism in a whole new (monochromatic) light.
I like 30 Days of Night and Near Dark for its animal like ferocity.
The original Nosferatu from 1922 is brilliant for atmosphere and creepiness.

Comment by HammerOfGod

October 15th 2008 02:23
Bryn, yes they are the same women in Ginger Snaps Back...though more attractive looking LOL. It takes place at a remote fort in early 19th century Canada

yes I've seen the addiction. Christopher Walken is one of my favorite actors

Near Dark is one of my favorite films of the genre

30 days of night is also another favorite, my only issue with it was they made the lesser vampires to animalistic

I tried to make the book funny as well. I have penned three humorous plays for our local theater company

Chapter two of the book opens with my main character(a real vampire) not being allowed into a vampire theme night club because he does not fit the image of the club. according to the doorman "buddy, if you want to get in you at least need to try and look like a vampire"

Comment by HammerOfGod

October 15th 2008 02:47
back on topic though

of all the myths, books and films

the vampire seems more in control. People can have an encounter with a vampire and may not be attacked

with werewolves it seems if you are around when it changes, odds are it's going to attempt to have you for dinner

also the vampire seems to have much more supernatural powers in it's arsenal then a werewolf

Comment by Bryn

October 15th 2008 03:55
Hammer, my father has a brief role in 30 Days of Night; he plays the old codger who gets killed at the beginning and has his head put on a stick! Go dad!!!

I'm incredibly fussy when it comes to mixin comedy with horror. As a rule I prefer my horror straight and hard. But there are exceptions to that rule. I really dig Vampire's Kiss and I also really enjoy From Dusk Till Dawn.

Comment by kolosos

October 17th 2008 17:22
well...i just saw this argument and i HAD to say something...ive wathced lots of movies(MOVIE FAN!!)and played some games with vampires and werewolfes(yes there ARE such games)and heres my argument...

VAMPIRES:
Immortal,seductive(i read soemwhere in the early posts...get turned into vampire when ure ugly???no way...like u all know..vampires are smart..they wont bite an ugly dude..),they HAVE somewhat control of what they are doing from the very beggining after "being turned".Now,like EVERY book says:they need blood,there fore they must feed...but lemme ask u this..have u seen that seris(i think it was ER with george clooney)..in there a patient comes in the hospital and tells the nurse:
"could u please give me a bag of b- blood?'
the nurse asks why..then the old dude(he was ugly too..which is weird)he said:
im a vampire,and i need blood,but i dont want to harm other people..so i beg u..please give me one bag...(GIVE ME ONE SHOT MAN!one sniff...im dried up..and im addictive lol)...then he says hell either die or kill someone if he doesent get the blood...i dunno what happened next...but its an example that evne when vampires get blood thirsty they can maintain control...

WEREWOLFES:
they are wild,uncontrolable at the beggining...but they AGE..which is important..becouse..a vampire never dies from old age..where werewolfes,they can get old...and fragile..BUT,they have a human form most of the month(like a period??)but when the full moon comes out they turn into a hairy form..and if not in control..they CAN and DO kill everyone around them..but they CAN maintain control...cush as..know when the full moon rises and bind oneself with chains...another thing..a werewolf is born(or made)with what i beleive is known populary among the people...DUDE!!IM NOT GAY!!STOP KISSING ME IN THE NECK!!!...or another werewolfes bite...or so i think...there a many beleifs and folklores about how u become a werewolf...but that aplies for vampires as well...

so i say...they BOTH can control their "dark side...its all a matter of will and soul...if the vampire wants to hunt..he will lure the prey with sexapeal and other stuff...and then kill him...but if he has controll...hell do what the ugly dude did in ER...while werewolfes...dont have the NEED to kill people..i mean,sure,when they are in wolf form..they are wild and most of the time they dont know what they are doing...but if they have control over their wolf form(i use wolf form cos its cool-ishier lolz)they dont need to kill people..of course there are the arguments that they need blood too..but i say one word to that...ADRENALIN!!!yes,when they re turned they get an adrenaline rush and the urge to fight..more.and MORE...but if one can control it..they dont need to kill...

now i know i said more about werewolfs...but thats cos im a werewolf fan...and that doesent change my opinion that BOTH can HAVE control...

tell me what u think of meh comment

Comment by Mayloooooo

October 17th 2008 20:36
Ok,first of all,VAMPIRES RULE.Second,I believe is vampires have more control.Vampires can cantrol themselves when they have the power too.But,unless they havent eaten in days then yeah tey will drink.Vampires will choose their victims wisely.If they smelled the best blood it means like love.But if they do smell any kinda of normalblood then yeah they'llfeed.Anyway whatever I just said you probaly think is nonsense but I am a big fan of vampire.

Comment by HammerOfGod

October 18th 2008 05:28
bryn, I agree 100% about comedy and horror. What I'm working on is a serious horror/mystery novel. I did add a few moments of humor(mostly dark)

and that is pretty cool about your dad being in 30 days of night

Comment by The Bearded One

October 29th 2008 12:17
First of all I would like to say hi^^

Second of all heres what I'm bringing to the table;

It is clear that both werewolves and vampires represent the darker side of humanity. On one side of the spectrum is the brutal, untameable beast and on the other the subtle and manipulating seducer. These incarnations of vampire and werewolf reflect the darker urges we are all, as humans, subject to. To indulge in these dark whims without control or thought is to essentially become either one of these monsters. I suggest that werewolves and vampires represent two different forms of a complete loss of control/morality over self.

A vampire is the epitome of selfishness and decadence. They are portrayed as having being indulged in every pleasure of the flesh, often represented as sensual, cruel and inhumane. They are most certainly a manifestation of uncontrolled desire. Desire to control and dominate at the expense of others.

Werewolves are similar. They represent natural urges obeyed without question. They are brutal dominating and violent. It is clear that the form of a wolf is representative of the disintegration from human into beast, as all form logic and rational thinking are lost. This is can be seen as a complete lack of control over primal urges.

Impulse and desire, werewolf and vampire. The materialistic and lustful side of ourselves, which craves the flesh, must be brought under control. The urges to dominate, fight, kill, reproduce, eat, gather and ravage likewise. The manipulating vampire and violent werewolf could be considered two sides of the same coin, in that they both completely lack certain aspects of control.

An unlikely compromise perhaps?

Btw if you were smart you’d know werewolves are so much better then those melodramatic, overdone romantic, poofy, poetry writing, pathetic, crybecauseihaveitworsethenany bodyelcebutcan’tdie, late Victorian dressing, vampires.

Comment by Bryn

October 30th 2008 03:14
Bearded Clam, oops, I mean Bearded One
Some good comments there, but I didn't take to the sneer of your snout at the end "btw if you were smart ..."
The whole point of this debate is to ruffle feathers and coax people's opinions ... it's got nothing to do with whether I'm smart or not.


Comment by The Bearded One

October 30th 2008 06:18
^__^ No offence intended

Maybe I got a little carried away >.<

My bad everyone

Comment by Bryn

October 30th 2008 08:11
No offence taken, just foolin' with ya ... it's Halloween season after all.

Comment by Anonymous

November 18th 2008 20:46
it is funny how horror movies change, when Vampires hit the seen they were very portrayed as been scary as hell, as for Werewolves they were like a big dog a bit scary but nothing like Vampires. now for me Vampires are just soft Gothic loving people & not hard any more, what just stupid. look at the film Underworld & blade. now i like the idea about Lycans been a variation on werewolves, were now we have two types of species which is cool. the old school Vampires vs old school werewolves, i would go with Vampires but with a new species as Lycans then Lycans all the way.

Comment by Anonymous

November 21st 2008 06:42
First of all when a person transfroms into a Werewolf the sight of one looking at you would be terrifing and In Van Helsing he turned into a Werewolf and made Dracula look like he was nothing compared to him, I bet if the Werewolf wanted to he could have killed him when he transformed

Comment by DarkWolf

November 28th 2008 03:27
im takin the wolf side due to their ability of caring trying their hardest to not be evil.vampires r just zombies with fangs. also on every test i take i turn out to have the personality of a wolf

Comment by Bryn

November 28th 2008 03:48
DarkWolf, "vampires r just zombies with fangs" ... Ha! Nice.

Comment by quagmire91

November 28th 2008 05:39
vampires are over rated, they are just stupid! ooooohhh here she comes to bite my neck! so spooky (not) vampires are so fucking emo it just pisses me off. emo=vampire cuz they both are in love with black stuff and blood! vampires have to live that way for ever, at least werewolves get an afterlife! they always show how the vampires are so in love! HA! they wont feel that way in about 200 years or so. they will be so sick of each other. werewolves dont have to live with the same chick their whole life, once they are dead, they are done!

Comment by DarkWolf

December 3rd 2008 05:10
it seems that the werewolves have won this match up

Comment by Bryn

December 3rd 2008 05:40
DarkWolf, I'd say the lycans have the edge fer sure.

Comment by fenriz

December 4th 2008 20:30
[SIZE=4]vampires seem like Parasites that need a host to live bt you wont see them on the body of the host bt for the lycanthrope it changes all of them. even if the person is a lycanthrope cant remenber wot he/she that wud b better than having to remenber the faces n wot u did to them like the vampires then they wud have to live with it till someone kills them. so if i had to choose bewteen a lycanthrope or a vampire i wud chose to b lycanthrope/SIZE]

Comment by quagmire91

December 16th 2008 01:55
dude, werewolves are sooooo much better, just cuz of their sheer size, plus they are hung way lower than those pussy hissing vamps anyday(if you catch my drift)

Comment by Bryn

December 16th 2008 03:30
quagmire ... you got hairy cajones dropping that remark!

Comment by Anonymous

December 19th 2008 21:56
Nowadays there are many stories of wherewolves being in control af both the transformation and their actions while transformed, althoug there are also "vegetarian" vampires, they still have to drink some blood, otherwise they die, while the werewolves who have control over themselves do not need to kill.

Comment by Nik

December 21st 2008 05:12
Werewolves beat the crap outta vampires. Ok vampires are fast and "sexy." But werewolves are super strong, very loyal (like an actuall wolf), have many friends and I don't think as scary as vampires.

Vampires allways wanna suck your blood. But a werewolf can just go hunting when he's hungry. If you paper cut yourself with a vampire around, YOUR GONNA DIE! Also, werewolves have their senses hightend to the max, along with super-agility. I would say werewolves own all.

Comment by Royale

December 21st 2008 15:44
Just different, werewolves represent the combonation of man and beast where the beast is dominate...in vampires the human spirit is dominate, corrupt and always hungry but dominate still...werewolves simply are what they are ...primal and instinctive......I think a more proper quiestion wopuld be which one wants to control their dark nature

Comment by Reaper

December 22nd 2008 08:20
Ok, so when you talk about Vampires being immortal it come at such a price I dont know if you can even call it "immortal". They have to constantly drink, cant be in the sunlight, and they can be killled. In many cultures and stories all you have to do is behead the Vampire and its done. So the chances of them dying is alot higher than people think. Seriously, how long can you get away with killing people and animals? Im going to have to go with Werewolves.

Comment by Tury

December 23rd 2008 17:59
I'm actually a fan of werewolves but I also dabble in vampirism but yea I like the elegance and secretive techniques of vampires but I also like the raw power of a werewolf

Comment by Tury

December 23rd 2008 17:59
I'm actually a fan of werewolves but I also dabble in vampirism but yea I like the elegance and secretive techniques of vampires but I also like the raw power of a werewolf

Comment by William Black

December 25th 2008 12:05
Werewolf or vampire? Werewolf...I don't buy the whole sexy bit that folk are pushing. A cold, pale, undead creature is not my idea of a hot date. You may as well hit your neighborhood morgue and get your freak on with a corpse or two! Werewolves are living, breathing creatures atleast, not that i would fall in love with a 12 foot tall, 1000 pound she-wolf, but atleast it's not the evil undead!
As far as control, gonna have to go with vampire. The vampire is actually thinking and calculating, enjoying death and the torment. The werewolf is operating on instinct and the need for survival. Not to mention the werewolf I believe just eats what is available. If it were in the wilderness, I'm sure it would eat bear, deer or whatever was in range, not making any distinction, just food. Of course I'm basing this off of what I've seen in movies. Besides Underworld which actually shows the wolves choosing and thinking, not just operating on instinct.

Comment by Bryn

December 27th 2008 06:13
William, I like your comment.

Comment by Royale

December 27th 2008 21:04
I am curious could there be weredogs.....lik were labs or weresheperds or werepoodles and would they be stronger than wereparrots

Comment by William Black

December 28th 2008 00:27
Thank Bryn...I just saw the trailer for the 3rd installment of the Underworld movie series! And low and behold they are focusing on the werewolves! Rise of the Lycan...Lucian and Raze will hopefully be whooping vampire ass!

Comment by Bryn

December 28th 2008 06:40
Royale, well there's the wererabbit ...

William, yeah, hopefully better than the crappy first two movies, even if Kate Beckinsale is hot to trot. Although she's not in the prequel, the equally hot Rhona Mitra is!

Comment by Anonymous

December 29th 2008 02:38
people all think that vampires enjoy sucking blood and killing, but thats only true in some cases. a lot of us vampires don't like the fact that they must kill to survive. They know they must, and so they do, but they do it as few times as they can and they try to make their... victim... feel as little pain as possible. We vampires, are usually much more in control of ourselves then werewolves, although some of us vampires tend to try and become more instinctive when they feed so that they don't have to think about it as much. Also, we vampires aren't at all immortal, although many of us vampires do live prolonged lives (most live to somwhere between 100 and 200 years of age). We act almost perfectly normal during the daytime, and all sunlight does is make our vampires' vision more dull and make it much harder not to give in to our their instincts. Vampires don't necessarily look more handsome or beautiful than others, but we do, without trying, attract others and are able to, to some extent, manipulate them. We do have cold skin, but not too cold - our heart beats, just slowly and with cooler blood. I do not know that much about werewolves, because I have never seen one. I do, however, feel strongly opposed to them, for they don't seem like the types of creatures I would like.

Comment by Anonymous

December 29th 2008 02:38
people all think that vampires enjoy sucking blood and killing, but thats only true in some cases. a lot of us vampires don't like the fact that they must kill to survive. They know they must, and so they do, but they do it as few times as they can and they try to make their... victim... feel as little pain as possible. We vampires, are usually much more in control of ourselves then werewolves, although some of us vampires tend to try and become more instinctive when they feed so that they don't have to think about it as much. Also, we vampires aren't at all immortal, although many of us vampires do live prolonged lives (most live to somwhere between 100 and 200 years of age). We act almost perfectly normal during the daytime, and all sunlight does is make our vampires' vision more dull and make it much harder not to give in to our their instincts. Vampires don't necessarily look more handsome or beautiful than others, but we do, without trying, attract others and are able to, to some extent, manipulate them. We do have cold skin, but not too cold - our heart beats, just slowly and with cooler blood. I do not know that much about werewolves, because I have never seen one. I do, however, feel strongly opposed to them, for they don't seem like the types of creatures I would like.

Comment by Bryn

December 29th 2008 04:13
Anon ... not trying to let anything slip are you

Comment by Royale

January 3rd 2009 03:02
They are both predators...so are humans after a fashion, ...both represent the dark side of human nature empowered by different dark and or demonic forces. The savage animal and the cold calculating killer warring sides of humanities darker nature ...one primal, brutal and filled with a childlike innocence the other sophiscated and cynical wrapping itself in the glories of the culture it prays on....they are us not better or worse just different sidwes of the same devil

Comment by Bryn

January 3rd 2009 03:28
Royale, fantastic comment, you've kicked off the debate for the new year in smart and provocative fashion!

Comment by Anonymous

January 3rd 2009 20:59
Your text goes hereYour text goes herewould'nt the fact that the wearwolves have less controll of their dark side make them more dangerous

Comment by Anonymous

January 5th 2009 05:54
i think royale pretty much said what was all on our mind
...and to add on to what he said that i think werewolves would be more dangerous since they dnt have control.
in most of the literature i have read vampires always use intelect to win their batlles as on the other hand werewolves use both intellect and brute strength
i personally am all werewolve probably because i have the werewolve gene in my family
aand going back to (dnt feel like going back through all of that) werewolves are loving and loyal
so the fact that the curse happens to them that when they transform they betray thier loved ones
(kinda ironic dnt you think)anyways i belive that werewolves have the ability to be in more in control of their daekside and when in their human form they could be trying to find a way to control it so........
yea

Comment by Anonymous

January 5th 2009 05:54
i think royale pretty much said what was all on our mind
...and to add on to what he said that i think werewolves would be more dangerous since they dnt have control.
in most of the literature i have read vampires always use intelect to win their batlles as on the other hand werewolves use both intellect and brute strength
i personally am all werewolve probably because i have the werewolve gene in my family
aand going back to (dnt feel like going back through all of that) werewolves are loving and loyal
so the fact that the curse happens to them that when they transform they betray thier loved ones
(kinda ironic dnt you think)anyways i belive that werewolves have the ability to be in more in control of their daekside and when in their human form they could be trying to find a way to control it so........
yea

Comment by Anonymous

January 5th 2009 05:55
i think royale pretty much said what was all on our mind
...and to add on to what he said that i think werewolves would be more dangerous since they dnt have control.
in most of the literature i have read vampires always use intelect to win their batlles as on the other hand werewolves use both intellect and brute strength
i personally am all werewolve probably because i have the werewolve gene in my family
aand going back to (dnt feel like going back through all of that) werewolves are loving and loyal
so the fact that the curse happens to them that when they transform they betray thier loved ones
(kinda ironic dnt you think)anyways i belive that werewolves have the ability to be in more in control of their daekside and when in their human form they could be trying to find a way to control it so........
yea

Comment by Anonymous

January 12th 2009 17:51
id say werewolves mostly because of the movie blood & chocalate but there are many other instances in all types of literature where werewolves not only control themselves but there are also stories were they dont even crave flesh the whole darkside of the werewolf would have to depend on a specific movie or book because Spoiler here in new moon jacob doesnt feed on people he protects them end spoiler even in some cultures like some indian tribes were thought to be descended from wolves hat whole darkside is questionable depending on which way you would like to look at it as for me i thnk werewolves who feast on human blood a darker because they rip them to shreds be lucky if you could identify the body vampires merely drain the victim of blood ooh so scary rip to painful death suck my blood out quickly which seems darker to you?

Comment by Alpha_male

January 13th 2009 21:00
easy choice
werewolves every time
1: they can change at will
2: its not a curse, i think its more of a blessing come on-immortality, instincts of an animal and the brains of a human, you get to hunt and no one can say anything about it, you can eat as much as you want and no one can say anything, physically toned and sexy with rugged looks rather than suave sexiness, they have awesome hair and can do wt the hell they like n dont have to fit in

i ges the only problem with a werewolf would b the fleas lol

vamps cant enter the sunlight
they NEED to fead where as a werewolf can choose to feed
and they have to listen 2 classical music

sorry but i'd go psycho if i had 2 live like tht

Comment by Ayeshera

January 15th 2009 21:22
Your text goes hereYour text goes here
I think vampires arte better then werewolves because they are dont sleep at night wererwolves do

Comment by Bryn

January 15th 2009 22:53
Ayeshera, arguably the simplest most direct argument yet. Cheers How old are you by the way?

Comment by LamiaRexRgis

January 18th 2009 15:45
Vampires, unlike Werewolves, don't have a true control over themselves, but who does? At least they aren't afraid of the dark. . .

Comment by Anonymous

January 18th 2009 22:34
I'm with you on the whole 'not afraid of the dark' thing, but I don't see your point do you like vampires or werewolves?

I personally like vampires, 'cuz they're really cool. First off, they can fly and run really fast, and they aren't like the flesh-hungry, die-hard, cold-hearted, dirty werewolves. no offense intended to anybody.

But also, werewolves are good because they can actually go out in the day, and they aren't fully controlled by a thirst for blood (or, in their case, flesh). BUT though they are controlled by their darker side under the full moon, they still have their human side, right? Only transforming into a werewolf under the light of a full moon, whereareas a vampire is always a vampire. (Right?)

But I'm not really reliabe on this topic. I've read a few books on vampires, one or two on werewolves, and I've researched them (each) a little bit., but I'm no where near an expert on either creature.

Long story short, they both have flaws, and they both have advantages.

I still like vampires better.

Comment by TheDrkKnightThePrinceOfDarkness

January 24th 2009 09:28
Vamp Vs. Lycan
By: Thomas Moreau

Everyone has there own thoughts and beliefs about Vampires and Werewolves/Lycans but who is truly right..?
I've seen all the movies and read all the book, I've surfed the web and I tell you the answers changes constantly, everyone has there own version, legends, myths and stories to tell! and everyone is entitled to there own beliefs!

Me personally, I luv the movie Van Helsing and the Underworld Movies and I'm looking forward to go see the new one Rise of the Lycans this weekend. As for books, I've recently seen the new Twilight movie and that got me into reading all four book... Although I am sickened by the fact that in these book the Vampires seem to "shine/sparkle" in the sun rather then burn... I still like the twist and the idea of Vampires who can go in the sunlight, much like Blade! (Day Walker) but again I would like to point out these are movies, not the real thing and that the only true way to know any of these things would to become either a vampire or werewolf are self's..!

.. I know some ppl think it silly and some what stupid... but I do believe in Vamps and Lycans... and I have given it careful consideration, as to which side I would choose if the opportunity presented it self?

Vampire or Werewolf?

As it so happense, I am a big fan of Lycans (werewolf's) but Vamp fans dont get me wrong... Just because I say I like the wolf doesn't mean I don't choose the path of a Vamp...

See I personally, grew up with the fear of DEATH!
...
I re-call my child hood nightmares... Waking up in fear and tears at the thought of one day dieing, I re-call my grandmother rushing into my room at late hours of the night to comfort me and tell me it would be alright that the lord god would watch over me and protect me and never let anything bad happen to me but she also said that there will be a time where are lord god and savior will call upon us to join him in the heavens...
...
But I could never take comfort in her words... I would still have nightmares of mine and my family's death, loosing those closest to me, having my name lost in time, never to be remembered and never know what lay waiting for me after death... Is there anything? is there a god? I would like to think so, yet even tho I rarely have those nightmares today, my fear still to this day leaves me knowing with out hesitation that if the opportunity to become an immortal creature of the night (vampire) ever presented it self to me I would take it, again with out hesitation and I would do my best to control it, like the Cullen family from Twilight... I would do my best to live a normal life!
Now I only mentioned Vampire there because unlike Vampires, Werewolf's only live for so long... It's true they are immortal as well, just like the Vamp's but only for a certain amount of time... Eventually they will go back to being humans and one day die, as my new fav book series Twilight describes in full and better detail.
I started having my nightmares at a young age every night till I was 12 years old, I am currently 19 yet still like I said from time to time get those horrific nightmares, they are not as bad as they were for me as a child yet they still have me sitting up at late hours of the night in my bed with fear and pain in my eyes, worried of loosing the ones I luv and the ones closet to me..! (I rarely sleep these days!)

As for the main Question of this blog...
There are many different ways to look at this but...
Vampires need the blood whether humans or animal, it does not matter but it is required, I personally would choose to feed on the blood of an animal, rather then end another life! (again read Twilight, for my views and beliefs are similar to the Cullen family)
As for the Wolf, it is still very difficult to judge...
Yes they seem freakishly huge and at times I'm sure scary but I don't believe they are truly dangerous at all... Like a normal dog, if u anger the animal it will turn and attack... So don't piss off a Lycan, that seems to make the change from man/women to beast, more inevitable for them. I believe that a Werewolf can control its self once in its Wolf form but again all Wolf's are different just like each human is different... A human who goes to anger management, probably wouldn't be the greatest Werewolf... I'm sure in that case the rage would be to much and the animal instinct would over power to human spirit and take over causing havoc and mayhem in its wake.
Unlike say... A very loving, peaceful person, I'm sure someone like that would be able to control the change and there emotions allot better.
So what it all comes down to is there is no right or wrong answer... There are good Vamps and bad Vamps... Good Dogs and Bad Dogs...

I will not say either one is worse or better then the other, for both are equal in my mind, especially when it comes to controlling there darker side!
(it all depends on how you choose to live your life with the gift/curse/new life you are handed!)


Haha, now I have an idea as to how Vamps and Wolfs became to be... Silly I know, I'm sure I may be wrong but it was a thought I had one day and I don't see any reason why not... I would like to share it with all of u and get your feed back on how either silly/stupid or possible this may be...

My theory:

In the beginning, "god" created all man and women to live "forever"... Until the "bible" says "Adam & Eve" tasted the forbidden fruit and god cursed them to live the short lives we humans live today.
Now... I believe Vampires are rly fallen "angels"... Because they come from "up above" (heaven) they are "cold" and there beauty, strength and speed are match by no mortal being (plus in Twilight they shine with light when in the sun) so I believe god allowed some "angels" back on earth to live there lives as the immortals we were all meant to be, here on earth but at a price... They would need to drink the blood of humans to stay on the earth, for they are no longer human, they need the blood to allow there bodies to stay on earth otherwise there souls would be gone forever, lost in total darkness, as I personally fear!
Now this is were the Wolfs come in... For those of you who don't know the "dog" is a sign of the underworld, a demon, a hound from hell... Now I believe the "devil" was angry with god for allowing his angels on earth, because the angels could bite and turn other humans into immortal beings as well... Never having to die. The devil didn't like this because souls that were meant to go to him were locked away on earth, never to leave there humans bodies, so the devil sent his own angels... "Hounds of Hell" (Lycans) to earth with one single purpose to reed the earth of the Vamps to allow the souls to continue and make there way into the fiery pit of Hell. This would explain why Werewolf's are so warm and why they only live as immortals for so long, because unlike god, the devil wanted his "angels souls" to finally make there way back to him in Hell!
and this is how I believe, Vamps and Lycans came to be and why there is this battle that rages between both races!

Thx, for reading my Long Comment ><

I hope I have been of use and that I have shined some light on the topic at hand and given you all a new out look on Vamps & Wolfs!

Sincerely,

Thomas J. Moreau
sgt.moreau@hotmail.com

ps. I thought I should mention, if there are any of you out there who share my thoughts and beliefs please, feel free to contact me. Also if anyone out there can turn me or help me on my quest/journey to be turned into either a Vamp or Wolf! I know it wont be easy, a long shot but I would be for ever in your dept!

To be reed of my DREAMS and purged of my fear, to live... In a world with out pain and walk this earth till the end of time!

Again Thank You.

Comment by dudes

January 27th 2009 03:13
put 4 vampires in a forest, 1 were wolf fully transformed,

a blood bath, where wolfe at first finds them, bites one, cut a notherone in half, a nother one is alrady stabed side ways on a tree, and the last one triyng to escape, flying, the werewolve
gets him by the leg and crashes down on the ground making the vamps hart explode, the vamp cut in half tries to crall away and the wherewolve biets the vamps head of (dont think he survived that) then stabs its harry hand into the biten vamp, taking all of its intestines and heart out, and of course taking a bite out of it and the last vamp, still trying to brake of the branch of the tree throu his chest shares one more dathe with the hungry, !REAL! hungry werewolve.

vamps are sexy and all, they have more control over their dark side but, sence the wherewolve kiled all the male vampires, he ends up like a vampire pimp still beeing an invencible where wolve with an inmortality and harry course

where wolves beastly get what ever they want, and thats owsome.

vamps, dead, and dead dont and cant biet,

Comment by Anonymous

February 10th 2009 04:28
crazy blog a discussion going on for over a year! anyway, id just like to state my opinion and i think it "owns" everyone else.

this is my answer:

vampires have control over their evil side, they know what they are doing and dont care, they only care for themselves, when you turn into a vampire you are no longer yourself your a vampire not the living person you once were, you lure your victims intentionally you can choose the victim etc, and you have little thought on what their feelings are.
as portrayed in alot of books and films.

and now werewolves which ARENT EVEN EVIL, is not even evil. define evil? is a lion evil for hunting prey? is a wolf? is a cat evil for killing the bet budgie nextdoor and eatting it. no, you can only do something evil if you can choose it, and intentionally cause pain/suffering on another. a werewolf (the person) has no control on what hes doing (in werewolf form) so hes not doing anything evil. hes just being as nature intended (supernaturally intended)

on a note about the whole cooler than what debate?
id have to say werewolves from underworld series, just being able to turn into such brute force on will and havea huge advantage over vampires (daylight).

shame blade isnt really a proper vampire, because that is.... cool

Comment by Anonymous

February 10th 2009 04:40
from the poster above:

replying to Thomas Moreau

i do know what you are getting at with the whole immortally thing, but as you said your 19. and you have a fear of death. in my opinion and im sure you will see this later on is that death is what makes us live. if we couldnt die then you would end up killing yourself anyway after a certain amount of time and depression when everyone around you dies. sure maybe you would like to live longer? at a certain age ofc not an old man. but in the end you will find content and decide to "leave". just like a long night out and the only thing you want is a good nice sleep.

oh and as my opinion i really really hope there is no afterlife, i dont want to sound emo or anything i enjoy being alive , but it would actually like to "rest" rest, without being able to think about all the people i left behind, that would be a bit of a torture. maybe some sort of lush bubbly mush like the feeling you get before you fall asleep and dream? i dunno

Comment by LamiaRexRgis

February 12th 2009 21:10
My point is that I prefer Vampires over Werewolves. As for my argument, I'ven't a very convincing one.

Though I must say, each creature keeps reign over their senses while transformed, no matter what they've become. It's just that neither species really cares. I mean, no matter the transformation they overtake, they're still themselves, are they not? Same minds, same people, same souls. The only difference is that in this new change, they feel more alive; more free. Like they can do whatever they please and no one has the power to stop them. They can specifically do whatever they want. They could possibly keep away from humans while they aren't themselves, but do they want to?

It's all basically dependent on whom of the creature you're looking at. One, say, Vampire might hate the humans because they murdered the Vampire's parents and family or so forth, so feels a deep loathe towards the human race. Or you could be dealing with a Vampire who's never been in any way harmed by a human, nor has any they've ever loved, and feel there's honestly no point in making more of what they were once taught to fear, considering they were once humans, only bitten.
And the same goes for Werewolves. If you're looking at one who's had an awful past with them, and hates them with all the black in their heart, they'd certainly want to kill them. But with no human interference in their lives ever, they'd feel no need, would they not?

So it mainly depends on the fact of whom you're looking at and what day they're having, really. If they feel like humans have done them all the wrong in the world and deserve what they've brought upon themselves, a Vampire or Werewolf would feel perfectly fine with killing off a small town of settlers. Where-areas if the Vampire or Werewolf was once a human, they might feel a sense of sorrow and ease and sympathy towards their past race, and will purposely avoid those whom they know would be in a sort of moral danger near them (in other words, every human).

Comment by Royale

February 13th 2009 16:56
adding to my earlier comment maybe the beasts would be \different with a differnt template ..say a werebear one one side or were whatever or maybe a spiderpire on the other side. It is however the same war...Thats where vamps and werewolves are different than other creatures of the night. They are avatars of the forces that created them

and I appologize for the spelling in the last post you think a former journalist would have better skills,

Comment by Not Anonymous

February 13th 2009 20:33
"Your text goes hereYour text goes herewould'nt the fact that the wearwolves have less controll of their dark side make them more dangerous" was written by me not royale.

Comment by Most Heinous

February 17th 2009 21:48
Who is in control of their dark side? A lot of excellent arguments have been presented for both sides, so I think that in order to make that decision one needs to go with their gut feeling. Werewolves have traditionally been ordinary humans cursed to, once every full moon, uncontrollably transform into a wolf and terrorize their own village. Vampires are in their state from eternity, and have the choice, the control, to do whatever they please. No matter how evil their doings are, they are in ultimate control of what they do. (For instance feasting on animal blood as opposed to humans)

But if you only focus on what werewolves and vampires have traditionally been, you will find yourself in stories such as Nosferatu, the vampire who could control rats... not at all the contemporary idea of what a vampire is, and we are in modern times with our own established ideas.

So take a look at the two in popular culture.

Alas, I don't think very many have mentioned it for a while here... but the character Lupin in Harry Potter is an excellent form of a modern werewolf. He is a normal human (wizard?) who bears a curse that has him beaten to weakness. He is assisted by other to keep control of his dark side, but regardless of what happens or who he is with, if he does not drink his potion, he kills anyone in sight. Also in Harry Potter, Fenrir Greyback, who I believe is in control of his dark side, in the sense he embellishes it.

Vampires in popular culture are slightly more intriguing, the first thought the comes to my mind is (swallows) Twilight. There is also the Underworld trilogy, perhaps the epitome of Vampire vs. Werewolf, but I'll get to that later.Twilight, though it is a love story shows vampires in their height of sexual appeal as yet seen, and their high level of control. The Cullens choose not to feed on human blood, while the other family (curse my memory) chooses to feed explicitly on human blood, displaying control and choice over their dark side. Also, curiously, Twilight removes the traditional effect of sunlight on vampires (though it did bother them, it was no longer fatal), and though it is not traditional, it is what people may come to expect out of vampires in the future and should be considered in my next argument...

So far, the vampires have won the battle of control, though not by much having Lupin, Greyback, and Lycans from Underworld as examples. I did my part and answered the question, but I recently finished the Underworld trilogy, which has me buzzing about Vampires vs. Werewolves.

Underworld is a very modern view of vampires and werewolves, going so far as to include ultraviolet and silver bullets to do extra damage to vampires and werewolves, respectively. (Modern popular culture where sunlight does kill vampires... perhaps a fading trend? We shall assume not so... for now) Not only did the vampires have the incredible sexual appeal (Kate Beckinsale... ROWR!!!(not a werewolf howl)), but were shown as suave, sophisticated, cunning, traditional, and just darn cool. The, lets face it, antagonist Lucien commands a somewhat brutish-appealing pack of animals (I know, I know Lucien would kill me for saying it, but look at some of those guys and tell me they don't look like the wrong end of some hairy animal)

Look at the movies, you won't regret it (the 2nd one is kind of weak)

Here is my scoring system:

Control of Inner Darkness
Vampires 9/10
Werewolves 4/10

Fear
Vampires 5/10
Werewolves 7/10

Attractiveness (Sexual)
Vampires 9/10
Werewolves 5/10

Strength
Vampires 6/10
Werewolves 8/10

Intelligence
Vampires 8/10
Werewolves 5/10

Weaknesses (i.e. sunlight, silver, stakes, holy water)
Vampires 3/10
Werewolves 6/10

Dude, there may be more categories, please introduce them but this is really the only thing you need to know

Coolness
Vampires 10
Werewolves 0-4 at tops

Comment by Bryn

February 18th 2009 01:46
Most Heinous,
cheers for your elaborate, comprehensive comment.
So are you suggesting that vampires have more weaknesses or that they have less weaknesses than werewolves, I wasn't sure which way to read the 3/10.

As for "coolness" ... that one I beg to differ. That is entirely subjective to one's own aesthetics. Personally I find werewolves "cooler" because I dig the primal animal element, which is essentially darker and more visceral. I also tend to gravitate away from what is in popular culture considered cool, and vamps have always held that mantle.

Comment by Royale

February 22nd 2009 14:54
You guys all have great points but I think the final oucome is very subjective....Good point about the modern portrayal of werewolves and vampires ...its almost class warefare brought to the big screen...but it still underlines the fact that werewolves are vampires are still us ...different sides of humanity's darker nature
tradition versus change, traditional power versus individual desire.....There is no right answer one side appeals to one side of us the other to the other side....

Comment by Bryn

February 23rd 2009 03:07
Royale, I like your angle!

Comment by PurRot

March 2nd 2009 05:44
Ok,

I have noticed a lot of people mentioning what the two eat, and using it to describe who is best. Yes, the vampire need blood, and the wolves just like their meat bloody, be really this does not give us a scope on who is in more control or not. Going by that then I must be a raving beast since I love my steak rare. But I'm not. . . well except for those 3-5 days or for 9 months straight, but otherwise I am nice. :0)

I have managed to find new authors that portray both the vamp and wolf. Only a few of them say a wolf is immortal, and if you think about it we humans only get about 50-80 years tops and look what havoc we create. Now think if we had a lot more time, or if we could go running though the forest or open field.

I still hold the belief that vamps have more contol in the long run then wolves they just have the time to get it under control. A wolf is allowed to kill its prey while a vamp cannot. So therein leaves me to understand that from the beginning a vamp is taught control where a wolf is not.

Having your darker side be allowed out every now and then would make it harder to control if you are always suppressing it, although I fear for the person who really ticks the vamp off and makes it go off on him/her.

BTW Bryan, you ever get around to reading the Anita series and if so did you like or not?

Comment by Bryn

March 2nd 2009 06:03
Pur,
Cheers for the comments.
No, actually I still haven't got around to reading an Anita Blake novel.
Which one do you recommend most highly?

Comment by Royale

March 3rd 2009 02:48
I keep coming back to the fact that these creatures are manifestations of us a cosmic split personality so to speak. Thats why the Underworld storyline which features the uniting of the two parts is so riveting, even if the last one was kind of ...well iffy...The two warring halves of humanities darker nature united in one nightmarish reality....Brute power, innocence and rage somehow combined with the stalking power- hungry aristocratic disdain, spped, intellilect and knowledge with ...well you get the idea

I always wanted to make a movie where all the were manifestations of the darker nature are united

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

March 3rd 2009 21:20
the werewolf hasnt got much control over his/her darkside as they are usually forced to change and have no control when they are changed. also the vampire has little control over his/her darkside aswell as they lust for blood and usually give in to their urges for it. therefore they are about equal in their control but...

i think vampires are quite cool, they have strength, agility, increased senses and look human but they cannot go in the sunlight as it will kill them and they gain no pleasure from, food, drink and sexual things.

werewolves on the other hand have also increased strentht, speed, senses and look human except when they transform. the werewolf is usually bigger and probably stronger than the vampire whereas the vampire is usually faster and more agile. the werewolf however can go out in the sun and is therefore not confined to the night and they gain pleasure from food, drink and sexual things.

however the fact that most werwolves are forced to change during the fullmoon and have no control is off putting but so is the fact that vampires cant go out in daylight.

therfore i prefer lycanthrope which is a different form or werewolves (kind of). a lycanthrope can change into there from at will and is therefore not a slave to it as a vampire and werewolf is. the lycanthrope can change and change back when he/she feels like it and therefore have the most control.

Comment by Royale

March 4th 2009 01:19
I never bought the whole death is what makes you live philosophy.....personally I vote for life under any circumstances
assuming the immortality is limited to vamps...which I doubt my choice would be the vampire....my civilized side the one that wants to be safe and fed and watch TV on the week ends and play on my computer, and do most of my "hunting" withing sight of a good cafe the one that wants respect from civilized people...likes the vamp..


on the other hand who hasn't dreamed of tossiing away the daily grind of modern life and run with the wolves.. the side of me that wants to not care about any of that ...to hunt for the sake of hunting..to howl at the moon because it is there ....etc etc likes the werewolf........

It just depends on which side you listen too

Comment by Anonymous

March 8th 2009 17:55
I think werewolves are more in control of their dark side, they can feed on what they like so their minds don't drive them towards one solid source of sustenance , making them more in control of their eating habits. Also they have the ability to walk amongst the living during the day and migrate to wherever it is they would like to live, and their only known bane is silver. Vampires are supposively threatened by the sun, garlic, holy water, wood through the heart, entering other people's houses can sometimes damage them i've heard, wich makes me think, could a vampire even get the drop on a werewolf if it cant enter its house without being invited? When a werewolf transforms it's mind turns somewhat bestial yes but i still think they have more control over their powers then vampires, who behind the fangs seem pretty vounerable now that i think about it. (constructive criticism only please) what do you think?

Comment by Anonymous

March 15th 2009 15:59
Vampires are much more in control of themselves than werewolves. True, there is one substance that they need, but they choose where and when (to some extent) they get it. Werewolves have no control over when they transform and what they'll do when they transform. Also, when werewolves are not in their beast form they are completely vulnerable to everything a normal human is vulnerable to. Vampires are never like that - they are always faster and stronger and more dangerous than humans.

Comment by Anonymous

March 18th 2009 06:44
I think that vampires are ore in control of there dark side because they have to hide being immortal and fot in if they are to stay in todays society.
The only rule of a vampire is to stay confidential
xx.TWIGHLIGHT.xx

Comment by Anonymous

March 18th 2009 06:46
I think that vampires are ore in control of there dark side because they have to hide being immortal and fot in if they are to stay in todays society.

The only rule of a vampire is to stay confidential
xx.TWIGHLIGHT.xx

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

March 19th 2009 18:12
vampire has control but will sometimes loose control because of their lust for blood.
werwolf has little or no control as when they transform they turn into a uncontrolable beast.
lycanthrope( form of werewolf) has pretty good control as it can change at will and remains dominant but will sometimes be forced to change if it gets really angry.
newborn vampire: little control - 10% control as the thirst for blood is overwhelming.
older vampire: good control - 75%-80% as it can control its self but sometimes may loose control when gets too thisty.
ancient vampire: excellent control - 99% control as it can easily contain its thirst but if deprived for a long period of time it MIGHT loose control too thirst (but it would have to be a long time)
werewolf: bad control - 5% control as it can control its self when human but when the full moon is out it is a total slave to the beast.
lycanthrope(form of werewolf): excellent control - 95% control as it can change at will and remain dominant but may be forced to change if gets too angry.

Comment by Royale

March 19th 2009 19:24
killer versus hunter ...vampires kill bcause of bloodlust werewolves kill out out of instinct

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

March 20th 2009 20:11
good point Royale both are driven to kill becauses of its darkside, one because of its thirst/bloodlust and the other animal instict.

Comment by Royale

March 20th 2009 22:04
absolutely..it is the cornerstone of the werewolf versus vampire millieu ......instinct for violence all " animals possess," and the more civilized addiction to bloodshed the more evolved animals seem to have....I am curious ..if there were such a thing as a were alligator or crocodile or were spider ..where would it fit in...are those creatures are to primitive even to have hunting instincts they are living calcutors. they are programmed to hunt by nature...can a creature be called dark if it does not have the ability to feel or think any way ....
I do sometimes wonder where other members of the supernatural mythology fit in .....ghosts, ghouls, witches etc... what they represent ........where they fit in the

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

March 20th 2009 22:12
another good point, werewolves when changed probably dont think, or feel they just survive. yh and it always about werewolvex vs vampires, give other things credit like ghosts, and zombies

Comment by smokey

March 25th 2009 17:36
Your text goes here[COLOR=Red]Your text goes here[/COLORWEREWOLF definetly thay dont try and lie just to suck ur blood at least thay are open and honest ................or dark and secretive. VAMPS i mean come on no ones gonna take the crap with the bitin on the neck 3 times its ridiculos i mean lets say your walkin to town and people see you with holes in ur neck and start being investigative and snoopin around who the likes that .?????????????????????? Besides a werewolf bites heals faster and then you dont have vamp hunters in you backside lookin for clues about you being a werewolf

Comment by jonny test

March 29th 2009 05:53
werewolves are awsome.I am a werewolf, and i am totaly in controle.

Comment by Anonymous

March 29th 2009 09:12
But 2 b fair vampires are quite secretive and good at not revealing themselves they try to coverup cox they don't wanna get caught but if the werewolf has no control then he is quite clumsy but people will think it is a animal attack

Comment by Royale

March 29th 2009 16:03
I here vampires dont like Pepsi...they prefer diet coke is that lame or what

Comment by werewolf teen

March 29th 2009 17:17
since im a werewolf, i believe that we are better race cause we can end things quickly without giving it a second thought about our prey. but vampires take to much preporation about there prey.

but then again my girlfriend is a vampire, so overall this feud is kind like a sibling thing. 2 things coming from the same thing.

Comment by Sakura

March 29th 2009 18:01
Well, you all have given much to this argument...but I don't know...I think vampires are better..but that's my opinion...my friend thinks werewolves are better...and I don't know what type of argument I can put against him...
Can someone help me please? He's starting to become a pain in my rear..
Many thanks.

Comment by Dyer_werecreatures

March 29th 2009 21:17
Ok so u prefer vampires, well... U could start by saying that the majority of werewolves can only change at a full moon so only once a month wereas vampires are constantly vampires and don't need to change, which means even though vampires are lethal at nights cox sun kills/hurts them werewolves are only lethal one night a month. Also they can't touch silver so u could b eating dinner with silver cutlery and BAMB dead or injured werewolf. Some werewolves don't have control web they change either. Werewolves can't hunt in public places either because web they change they kind of stand out but vampires blend in perfectley and can even feed in public as it may appear as a simple kiss. Even though werewolves are stronger web changed a vampire is faster so the vampire can strike b4 the werewolf has chance to even change.

Comment by roxas13

April 1st 2009 03:21
Your text goes here

i have to say werewolves they are cooler and just like bikers even though they rough on the outside they are reallyn some of the sweetest people you could meet

Comment by Bryn

April 1st 2009 04:36
roxas, that's the cutest howl I've ever heard

Comment by Royale

April 1st 2009 15:21
rotweilers are cool too until they take a disliking to you

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

April 1st 2009 16:49
yh but vampires r sneaky and will use u unless they develop feelings for u which is unlikely. they will get close to u an then drink ur blood either willingly or unwillingly. werewolves on the other hand are honest are dont try sneaking around they just dive in their get wot they want and get out but they have more chance of having feelings for u. vampires also are loners and only think of themselves (unless they are in a coven) but werewolves are almost always in a pack and always do wot is best for the pack even if it is bad for them.

Comment by Royale

April 1st 2009 19:14
I know people like the whole I am what I am up front thing...but think of it like this .,..if an truly innocent person meets a vampire there is at least a chance albiet a small one that they would take pity on them and find other more deserving prey...likely or not if a werewolf is on the hunt whatever comes across its path is dinner regardless

Comment by Sakura

April 2nd 2009 02:22
Thanks Dyer_werecreatures...

Comment by Bryn

April 2nd 2009 03:19
I stand clear of the argument, I only observe and moderate. But occasionally the odd howl escapes my lips ...

Comment by Drunkbarboy

April 3rd 2009 04:34
Between the two I would say they both roughly have about as much control of themselves as any normal person. The Vampire always aware of his actions can choose to fight the instinct of their blood thirst or to give in. They make every decision and can evaluate situations just as any normal person can. In other words, the Vampire always has control of himself/herself.
The Werewolf on the other hand has no control of himself/herself while taken form. But the lycan has complete control of their actions before their "inner beast" takes over. They have control over their emotions so if they let themselves become angered releasing themselves its their fault. The can also prepare themselves for the full moon letting them separate themselves from the rest of society.
In summary, Vampire or Werewolf, they both have complete control of themselves. It really just depends on their personality traits. Some Vampires choose to give into their darker side and some Werewolves choose to take advantage of the small space of time during the full moon to wreck havoc upon people, or to enrage themselves so that they may seek revenge upon those they despise. We see this in every manner of book or movie consisting of the two. The manner in which they choose to act reflects upon their personalities. They both have complete control of themselves just some are arrogant and ignorant (therefore stupid) and others are rational and premeditated in their actions.

Comment by Royale

April 3rd 2009 04:54
Excellent point...even demons bring their human flaws into any equation...Werewolves can be perfect gentlemen and ladies before they transform and as an especially "furry" person I I have sympathy for the wolf, but lets face it ...wolves are savage whatever they are before the change once transformed they are savage..........thats all......

Comment by smokey

April 5th 2009 20:37
Not all wolves are savage you know some can let their fealings get in the way but most unlikely this never happens vampires cause they are evil by blood therefor evil by heart/nature the thing is a werewolf has more self control I know some may think it because i am a werewolf but this is serious werewolf's do have more control over them self's because they know they gonna change sometime or another so they can chain themself's or something 2 that effect but vamps seriously have little control cause if they wanna feed they feed OF COURSE u get the odd ocassional ones that'll love and have a quick snack every now and a then from da gud old neck hey.
........

Comment by smokey

April 7th 2009 11:05
ok ive gotta say/admit vamps do have some control of them selfs and i dammmmm myself 4 doing that but they do.i hate being da nice guy.and is it me or do u guys post ur comments during the night even the werewolf guys and gal{even though they cant type}

Comment by smokey

April 7th 2009 11:12
Rolyal i litterly just red every single comment that u made and ive gotta say im impressed if not jelous about ur writing abillity's and some i must agree with that sometimes you do wanna run with da wolvs or act civilised but i mean u made a good couple of exelent
comments.

Comment by Royale

April 7th 2009 19:43
Lot of people here have made excellent commments about the werewolf versus vamp storyline..I think that says a lot about our culture and the modern struggle between ....primal individualism and civilized comformity...both have value that goes beyond concepts of good and evil ....both are natural reactions to the advantages and disadvantages of civlized life etc etc etc..This whole blog would make a great e-mag



Thank you for the compliment by the way
I used to be a journalist for small newspaper...even wrote a kids book about a goldfish....Ihave a BA....
Know anybody who needs a good horror movie critic or out of work reporter

Comment by Bryn

April 7th 2009 23:09
Royale, cheers for the summary there. I agree. I've been very impressed at how passionate so many readers are over the debate. The base concept of vampirism vs. lycanthropy has superseded the original question of which creature is more in control of their dark side.

Cheers for the props on the blog being an e-mag. Essentially it is one really, just not very sophisticated in its layout and design. I'd love for some wealthy benefactor to offer me in funding a good old fashioned hardcopy version of Horrorphile - Pleasure of Nightmares to be brutally honest! Although I wouldn't be able to publish trailers, of course ... Or perhaps offer to fund me my own website and a healthy weekly income to run it.

Comment by Royale

April 7th 2009 23:50
The question is what do you do about the mummies everybody loves mummies

You might not be able to run all you want but I bet if you put a counter on the sight and could get enough people to log in...you could get permission for trailers from new and recent rereleases ...its just a matter of phone calls and emails for permission..some places will even send it too you for free....once you are established..you could even get people to publish homemade clips and invite comment
We used to get free CDs at the paper I worked at all the time and it was a tiny 8,000 circulation rag with a just a few thousand web viewers....I have heard there are cheap and free ad sites for small businesses like ad sense...
As for money I'm flat broke but if you ever need a worker drone I work cheap and love to watch movies

Comment by Bryn

April 8th 2009 04:19
Royale,
I was actually referring to not being able to run trailers in a print mag LOL ...
To be honest I don't have the time to run an e-mag by myself, and I certainly don't have the capital to employ other people to help run one. Hosting this blog is a labour of love, I earn my bread as a professional DJ so you can imagine how exhausted I get, DJing at night, writing during the day.
If and when I get major sponsership I might look into expanding into an actual online mag, but for the moment, hosting this blog chews up enough time and effort as it is, for very little revenue. I love doing it, but I have to be mindful of the bigger picture, so to speak.
Thanks for your support and interest though!
There you have it. Sorry I can't offer you a job.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

April 8th 2009 07:47
Bryn hi, i would help run it for free and im sure lotas of others would aswell

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

April 8th 2009 07:50
oh i one more thing, anyone here got an ipod touch or iphone, and if u do have u got undeadlive, kwl vampire werewolf strategy game. well if u do add me vampie - 333131430



lycans rule!!!

Comment by Bryn

April 9th 2009 01:53
dyer ... thanks for the offer, and I'm sure there's hundreds more out there that would do the same.

Comment by Bryn

April 10th 2009 03:15
ATTENTION: MODERATOR'S SIDE QUESTION

As this debate is nearing the year-and-a-half mark and is easily the most frequented post on this blog I thought I'd pose a fresh side-question to all the regular commentators and to any newbies too.

Name a favourite vampire and/or werewolf movie.

Please identify the sub-genre (vamp or lycan) as well, in case it's a rare and unusual movie, so others can take note.

Me? I'm gonna be indulgent; at the moment two adolescent flicks are tickling my dark fancy: Let the Right One In is my fave vampire movie and Ginger Snaps is my fave werewolf movie (although it's a few years old now).

But my all-time faves would probably be: Innocent Blood (vampire) and An American Werewolf In London (werewolf)


Comment by Royale

April 10th 2009 05:13
Favorite movie is hard to name.....usually the one I have most recently seen...I like Underworld and the original Lost Boys.....a vamp movie There was a really cheesy old school vampire hunter movie called Captain Chronos........I actually liked the Christina Ricci movie whose name eludes me it was a werewolf movie

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

April 10th 2009 12:41
there r alot of good vampire and werewolf films but my favourites would have to be: underworld (all 3 films) and twilight - (vampire). but dog soldiers is also qiute a good werewolf film but not a favourite.

Comment by smokey

April 10th 2009 15:05
there is no greater movies than all 3 underworld movies by far yet thats my opinion! but there arnet any other interesting movies realy well for me.[besides all the riddick movies]

Comment by Bryn

April 11th 2009 01:47
Royale, the Ricci flick is Cursed.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

April 12th 2009 22:10
yh underworld rulz! i especially like the 1st one best then 2nd then the 3rd. but wot bout vampire/werewolf books? i like Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer's and the Moonlight and its sequel Blood Bound by Patricia Briggs they r quite good.

Comment by PT

April 19th 2009 10:13
Hey guys,
My first and only point...

Vampires have opposable thumbs... Bad luck Mr Wolf

and fav movies?

Interview with the Vampire
Lost Boys
Underworld
Let the Right One In

Ive never seen a good werewolf one
except that goosbumps one....
The Werewolf of Fever Swamp
fkn terrifying back in the day lol

Comment by Nate

April 20th 2009 23:37
In eternal battle of werewolves vs. vampires I think werewolves have a distinct upper hand. They're usually more powerful than vampires and would be able to dominate against a vampire. They have keener senses (i.e. smell, awareness, hearing, smell), considering these it would make it very difficult to sneak up on one were you trying to fight it.

If the basis for the power of the werewolf and vampire was to based on popular fiction then I think vampires would stand a little more a chance but would ultimately perish in the end. If your base for comparison is Werewolf: The Apocalypse and Vampire: The Masquerade then werewolves would totally destroy any vampire that they fought.
P.S. To the posters that say they havent seen any good werewolves in movies you should check out all three underworlds and van helsing. Do not base an idea of werewolves off of Cursed, Harry Potter and Blood & Chocolate.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

April 21st 2009 19:00
yh nate i totally agree i think werwolves are so much cooler and stronger in films like underworld and van helsing like u said and also dog soldiers. i dislike when werewolves turn out to be some people who turns into ordinary wolves like blood and chocolate, i just think it is lame.
and even though vampires and werewolves are supposed to be more or less equally matched i thin werewolves would probably take the upper hand because i have seen more films and game and books were werewolves are totally stronger and more kickass.
i would probably say werewolves are srtonger but vampires are faster though. vampires are also usually loners aswell were as werewolves travel in packs so they usually outnumber any vampires anyway.

Comment by Royale

April 21st 2009 20:31
if all you went by were entry level werewolves and vampires you might be right in favoring the werewolf...but vamps get stronger as they get older and their control of the dark powers or whatever you call it gets stronger......There is something appealing to Americans about the innocent primal power of werewolves but if history shows us anything it is patience and cleverness and numbers that usually wimns out in these battles...New vampires might be weaker but older ones aer demigods..time is on the side of the vamps

Comment by A random person

April 21st 2009 21:23
Ok, I'm kinda new on this site, but I'd like to make a reference to the role playing games: Vampire: The Masquerade and Werewolf: The Apocalypse. In these game, it's the Werewolf who's the superior one as they still have control over their bestial forms and know what they're doing, they can even transform at clear day and at will. Whereas the vampires still have all the weaknesses of sunlight, stakes, holy water etc.

But I've always been a Werewolf fan, solely because they look cool and are physically more powerful than vampires. Also, in the movie Van Hellsing, the Werewolf was the only thing which could stop Dracula, so they were created for stopping him.

Well, I think I said enough, thanks for listening ^^

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

April 22nd 2009 20:04
Royale i agree with u also about the fact that vampires get stronger as they get older but werewolves do aswell, they may start stronger but the vampires will eventually overpower them. i also agree that it is numbers that is one of the most important factors to the iternal battle between vampires and werewolves but i think werewolves are greater in number. this is because they can turn people (with a bite, or scratch or what ever according to different myths) but they can give birth aswell because they are still 'alive'. vampires can only turn people and cant give birth because the womens bodies cant change because they are clinically 'dead' or undead. also they can only sometimes change others because when they are biting their victim, bloodlust takes over and instead of turning them, they sometimes just drain them and kill them. vampires are also loners wereas werewolves usually go in packs so this also shows werewolves are greater in numbers. so if werewolves kill the vampires when they are 'young' then werewolves will totally own them but if a vampire can survive until they are strong then i think vampires will win.
so to summarise vampires have time as they eventually become stronger but werewolves have numbers and start of stronger. p.s i am english

Comment by Royale

April 23rd 2009 05:07
I think that vampires are only loners by choice......I heard on one television that the Navy SEALS special forces have a saying passion is not a method....werewolves will always hunt at the edges of society because they cannot possible blend in.vamps can be more direct because their coffin is right underneath the barber shop...also the fact that werewolfs are undead is not written.....in stone

Comment by TheNobleOne

April 26th 2009 16:12
Vampires Rock! They are no humans i know but they are less inhuman then Werewolves.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

April 26th 2009 17:39
TheNobleOne, i think werewolves are more human than vampires.
2 b fair vampires cant escape their fate. they are always vampires, they always drink blood and are always bound to the night etc. this totally seperates them from humans but...
Werewolves however, can either 1.) only change at a full moon so they are only different from humans once a month or 2.) can change at will and if they choose they could never change at all. WErewolves can also go out in the daylight without been hurt or suffereing any other consequences and can eat human food etc.

Comment by Royale

April 26th 2009 18:33
Most scholars agree that the things a cultures embraces as part of its basic mythology says a lot about it...these are the ideas that stay ...and are passed on and kept in common to one degree or another......because most individuals recognize some part of the myth in themselves......
thats what I think the whole vamps versus lycans storyline is...the struggle between competing sides of the same evil or good....

Comment by Royale

April 26th 2009 18:34
Most scholars agree that the things a cultures embraces as part of its basic mythology says a lot about it...these are the ideas that stay ...and are passed on and kept in common to one degree or another......because most individuals recognize some part of the myth in themselves......
thats what I think the whole vamps versus lycans storyline is...the struggle between competing sides of the same evil or good....

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

May 10th 2009 10:58
well we all talked about good werewolf/vampire films but what about books.what do you think are some good books? who are they by? and why? i like Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer's and the Moonlight series by Patricia Briggs, which is about werewolves/vampires/sorceries/ witchs/walkers and other creatures. any other recommendations for books?

Comment by Nate

May 10th 2009 17:59
good books
check out the world of darkness series Vampire The Masquerade and Werewolf The Apocalypse two very good series but are difficult to find in bookstores check amazon

Comment by Royale

May 10th 2009 20:21
and the chipmunks dont forget the chipmunks....seriously there needs to be a movie about all the archetypes...I have suggestions

Comment by Castacian

May 14th 2009 01:07
Werewolves are the forced outcast of the two creatures. Still the ties of being in a pack or family seem a much more amiable quality. Vampires are soulless, while the other cursed. A hard decision...but in the end, I side with the Werewolf. Of course, there are many variations to each legend, but as a Wolf you seem to have the odds on your side when combatting the mindless killing machine.

Comment by Anonymous

May 18th 2009 19:40
look werewolves and vampires are real

despite folk lore let me tell u the truth

vampires are born tht way but tend to kick of at puberty

their senses are sronger (usaly sight)
and they feed of blood and energy
they chose a main person to feed of whothey bond with so they only feed of there energy tht person becomes a werewolve

a werewolve despite what u belive never change neither does a vampire a werwolve is more or less a half human half wolf with animal instincts and better senses i know this because i am 1 and my best m8 is a vampire the only real diffrence is im more active and stronger -he is faster -he relys on blood -i have animal insincts

but he keeps me inline because otherwise im a bit of an animal hehe

reply

oh werewolves are better but i would say tht wouldnt i

oh nd half the crap u see in the movies is crap

any questions just ask me

Comment by Bryn

May 19th 2009 23:39
Royale, I sense a little frustration from you
Sounds like I need to put up a fresh debate question ...

Comment by Anonymous

May 22nd 2009 14:48
I side with Vampires no doubt about it.

Vampires are all diffrent all over the world depending on the mythology or legends you are studding. From being almost bloated looking with a redish purple tint to being seductive to being able to terrorize nightmare haaunt dreams and to being able to transform form crows to bats to falme.

Besides, there are multiple legends and myths of good vampires, vampires that don't cause harm, even vampires that help people.

Most myths of vampires and werewolves they are bothimmortal but can dye in certan conditions from being burn or with a steak through the heart. Beeing killed while in human for or shoving peices or mmetal stone or bricks in a corpses heart there are ways each can die again from the origens of the legend.

This question: Which has more controll over thier darkerside? is a question that cannot accually be answered inless you pick one region of the world.

Somehow though I still side with vampires. Mabey the fact thatthey intrest me more, I am not sure.

Ps. most of the movies about vampires are from the Southeast Europeian legend which irritates me now to the point of screaming though it was what led me to my intrests in the supernatural, and my favorite subject, vampire mythology.

Comment by Lonewolfgirl

May 23rd 2009 22:55
Being a wolf oftimetimes isn't a choice... but I feel that vampires are overated. My ex-boyfriend is one. He is very unstable in relationships. That's waht makes it so difficult...you know? Werewolves are so sure of what we want. Our emotions are powerful. Oftentimes we repress our desires (whether violent or sexual) for the saftey of our loved ones. Put two werewolves who hate each other in a room we can restrain ourselves well. Put to werewolves who are very close they won't even look at each other until the time is right. We aren't random and out of contol maniacs.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 2nd 2009 14:10
na every1 is intitled 2 their opinion but no1 can persuade me that vampires r better. both vampires and werewolves are strong, fast ave lots of stamina and even tho werewolves are weak to fire and silver, 2 b honest fire and sliver bullets r gonna kill most things . vampires howeva cant go in sunlight, imagine that no tan :'( or sunsets :'( : they would miss the sun so much and they cant go into a house without an invitation which kinda sucks. and a stake would paralyse them but then again stakes will hurt most things aswell.

so basically u ave 2 choose between
1.) neva seeing sun again and not going into ppls houses without permission or
2.) transforming forceably once a month and no silver.
personally i would rather ave sun than silver

Comment by Royale

June 2nd 2009 14:53
Im good.....I just think maybe the blog should be allowed to take a more aspects...Its a great blog and I would hate to see it get bogged down....There is no reason to abandone ther central theme just expand it a little ...

Vampires would probably be more fun to go to the movies with though...werewolves seem like monster truck pull fans

Comment by Bryn

June 3rd 2009 00:47
Royale, when you say "the blog should be allowed to take more aspects" are you referring to this particular debate battle post, or my whole blog?

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 4th 2009 20:36
soz 2 interupt but can i just ask a question: wot do U think a werewolf should look like A.) a 2 legged half human half wolf figure or B.) a large wolf? i personally think A

Comment by Bryn

June 5th 2009 05:01
I like A too ... re: The Howling, although the upright wolves of Dog Soldiers were very cool

Comment by Anonymous

June 7th 2009 13:23
I think werewolves as they can tear a vampire to peices and saying that they cannot control what they are doing is wrong many werewolves can command their change so they are even more dangerous than a vampire

Comment by Anonymous

June 7th 2009 13:46
A werewolf is just so much cooler than a vampire as the wolves able to control their powers are just DA BOMB able to do almost anything and werewolves can live for a very long time as after there biteing incident they age on 1 year for every 5 which is still pretty good dont ya think



Werewolves Rule!!!!

Comment by Anonymous

June 7th 2009 13:51
Bryn howd ya get the time to anwser everybodys blogs os often i think you must be pretty devoted

By the way i also wrote the last to Anonymous blogs
and im only 10 but i LOVE reading ....well probably not as much as wolfgirl but still its pretty good the whole inheritence sereis in two days!!!

Comment by Royale

June 7th 2009 14:49
The answer to the whole debate centers upon how much power you alot to werewolves and vampires ...
In some shows they are unstoppable 12 foot long dire wolves that move in the blink of an eye ...in others they are just kind of Neandedrthals with fur and teeth ...or regular wolves that wear pants during the day ...In some shows vampires are really demons of immense power with inhuman strength in others they are more a like Goths on steroids who are allergic to sunlight...or canibals who work out a lot
It really depends on which model you follow ....In the Underworld mythology they balance out with only the most elder and powerful of each kind reaching that godlike level of power....
the traditional werewolf models I remember were more like the Lon Chaney kind while the Bela Legosi vamps
there is a show on cable called world's most deadliest warriors ...maybe we should ask them to decide

Comment by Nightwalker

June 10th 2009 23:16
Can somebody help me? I`m trying to find the family tree and bloodlines of the vampires! I`ve found lots of text but not any pictures! Could somebody tell me good web site?

Comment by Royale

June 11th 2009 11:13
Hey guys its the middle of the night and like most children of the night who work the night shift i cant sleep....i was watching the news today and saw a story about an 80 year old man who burst into the holocaust museum and killed several people including one security guard who tried to save the patrons from his assault....This person was angry and already staring death in the face wanted someone to pay for the mess that was his life....his particular demon was Jewish and black people ...is there any doubt that darkness exist in the human soul....Is their any wonder why we are so fasinated with the darkness in our own souls....Most of the creatures we see portrayed in the our literature and cinema are projections of ourselves prcisely because we see that darkness on a daily basis blah blah blah

Comment by Bryn

June 11th 2009 22:28
Royale,
The Darkness in the human soul has been there since the dawn of Time. We are a fundamentally flawed species. I don't believe it's the fault of a God, as I am an atheist, I think it's probably got more to do with Abstract Thought.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 11th 2009 23:06
if u give any species free will ur bound to get some darker more evil people because its just fact. u will always get the good and the bad no matter wot. i believe everyone and everything has darkness in their soul as well as light its just their choice which they choose, dark or light.
i believe no species is entirely evil it just depends on the actual person/creature involved because of their free will because everyone has darkness and light in their souls.

Comment by Royale

June 12th 2009 02:54
True, im not a real religious person either and I read all about tranference and operant conditioning, self fufillijng propheies etc that In a way guys like that are worse than the mythological killers we worship...they are real...they have a choice ....They dont have to kill to live accept farm animals of course...They choose to make a living person the sourse of their rage....The demon is just following his instinct

Comment by Belial Elan Philokrates

June 14th 2009 23:25
Those mythical beliefs and ideals that thou aquired over the quick years have tricked thou feeble minds into believing lies and such. It amuses me that thou hast engendered this psychotic, deranged system thinking that we are fighting each other. The lycanthrope is among my bretheren although my gift has given my meer mortal life an eternal form into the covenent to prove my destiny worthy. I like how this famined world of hate and deception have thrown my kind agaist the lycanthrope. It makes the existence of our kind more... potent. I would like to see some truth in thou words that has been wasted on these lies that were previouosly submitted. Go to the eldest of our legends in the ancient scolls to find the truth. I can tell the exact location but when thou does find them, be prepared of who is there. I'll be waiting. Oh dont fret, our advanced species has been here this whole time, just watching and waiting. The covenent and lycanthrope is everywhere and we've been here for some time. And by the way the pictures of our kind that thou hast posted and all incorrect, we have much, much more beauty than those ugly humans with fake fangs and blood. Thanks for the amusment,Belial Elan Philokrates

Comment by jack the lad

June 18th 2009 18:28
Werewolves rule..... who cares about been in control of there dark side when the could just be wild.... so much better

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 18th 2009 19:39
vampires ave 2 b careful coz if they stay out 2 early they go poof obv and they r constantly planning and being careful but a werewolf can just be free and wild and they cud just live off the land coz they could hunt wildlife and stuff so they can live care free

Comment by Royale

June 18th 2009 20:00
yeah but 1000 years of being careful and partying on the weekends is worth a lot more than a few decades of living the wild life ....
Live free or die sounds great when your 12 ....not so much when your older ....
Ill take immortality and the cool cape with the patent leather shoes any time

Comment by Anonymous

June 19th 2009 02:50
I am a complete twilight fan which has opened my mind and I would have to say vampires=)

Comment by twilight freak

June 19th 2009 02:55
vampires defenetly (I now that what Im about to say is really sad but its true) I love vampires sooo much that every night I pray that I will become a vampire very soon....=) p.s. I have bad spelling.

Comment by twilight freak

June 19th 2009 03:13
I just want to make this clear many people are just saying werewolf because they think that vampires are nocturnal but they aren't first they don't sleep and second they don' burn or whatever in light they sparkle and they dont come out in the morning because if they did people would suspect somthing and they have to keep their secret

P.S. tell me somthing what would u think if you saw this beautiful creacher that is very pale looks like ahumane but is sparkling like a bunch of dimonds are inbeded in its skin? please tell me=)

Comment by No twilight please

June 19th 2009 18:59
I just want to add to the discution, Twilight is fine and all but u can't start taking it complately serious since there has been no previous mention of vampires sparkling. And to answer the question, vampires have beter control until they need to feed, but werewolfs still rule. HOWL TO THE MOON!!!!!

Comment by LOL TWILIGHT!

June 19th 2009 21:27
seriously people just because one movie tells you that vampires sparkle doesnt mean that this is actualy a fact now...i would have to go with vampires because of their sheer seductiveness and negotiation skills, they make for the perfect leaders. so by that i shall say VAMPIRES FTW!!!!

o and no sparkling
sparkling: making vampires easier to target since 2008
:'(

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 19th 2009 23:02
i no, twilight is awesome and all but that just 1 of many vampire films/books and one of the only that mention sparkling. the majority of vampire films and books state that vampires, when in direct sunlight will die or b in pain.

and yh vampires live longer, but then u would either ave 2 watch all of ur family and friends die or curse them with vampirism which kinda sucks, and even though u will may and i stress 'may' b able 2 work ur way 2 the top, the majority of ppl will still b ... well ordinary besides the obv fact that they undead. most will neva b able 2 b successful business ppl and stuff coz just coz u live alot longer (if u smart enough) u wont b any better at the stuff u already suck at.
and u will only get to live longer and have immortality if u can make it without eva being accidentally caught in the sun and dont piss of any stronger vampires or creatures. 1 mistake and ur outta there.

but a werewolf can make mistakes, the only thing that is poison to werewolves is silver (that i no about besides wolfsbane and plz say if u ave any contributions) and the majority of books i ave read state that silver only gives pain to the werewolf and will only kill them if comes in contact wiv the bloodstream coz it will poison the entire bloodstream and kill it. werewolves ave so much more freedom and fun coz it doesnt ave 2 b watching its own ass every 5 mins and usually travel in packs so that usually ensures protection anyway.

and u will def ave vampires AND werewolves who ave nearly perfect control of their 'dark sides' and both will lose that control when they need to feed/hunt.

and another thing, vampires would make gr8 leaders sure, they strong, manipulative and powerful but what happens when they need to go to a business metting at mid-day? or sumtime during the day sum1 forgets 2 shut the blinds and all of a sudden, poof! the manager of a 1 billion pound company gone and all that is left is a pile of burnt ashes?

any1 plz feel free to combat any of my points, i would b happy to c wot ppl ave 2 say about the points i ave made, no matter if it agreeing or disagreeing, i am curious, enlighten me

Comment by twilight freak

June 20th 2009 03:44
sorry if i afended u in any way bot vampires rule and they only sparkle in light

Comment by twilight freak

June 20th 2009 03:44
sorry if i afended u in any way bot vampires rule and they only sparkle in light

Comment by twilight freak

June 20th 2009 03:44
sorry if i afended u in any way bot vampires rule and they only sparkle in light

Comment by No twilight please

June 20th 2009 09:20
Oh come on, if u can name one source that is completely unrelated to twilight that says that vampires sparkle I will hop around on one leg while holding a bowling ball on my snout, deal? Vampires do not sparkle. Well anyway as for dyer_werecratures' coment I want to add that silver does not hurt a werewolf by mearly touching the skin, although it does crate a red spot it has to b pressed quite hard to make the blood boil and actualy create a wound, and it only poisons the blood if it is small enough to stay in the bloodstream.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 20th 2009 13:08
twilight freak u avnt offended coz i like to hear all different arguments, its just that i dont think it is a valid point coz i can only think of the 1 film/book that says this but i appreciate ur comments

i have read lots of books that varify what 'No twilight please' has said stating that it will only hurt if enough pressure is applied or if held long enough otherwise a red spot or rash appears.

but i disagree with the fact that only a small piece of silver will kill them because a bullet will not actual enter the bloodstream but will still poison it and a silver sword will have a similar effect. these 2 examples will not b small enough to stay in the blood stream but still poison the werewolf and kill them because it comes in contact with the blood which poisons them and will probably, eventually kill them

however there may b ways to prevent death (i am open for suggestions) because even though a werewolf may be shot or stabbed or face another form of fatal incoming with silver, they may still survive (any comments? i am curious how a werewolf may prevent death in a similar circumstance)

Comment by No twilight please

June 20th 2009 20:18
About the silver thing, I did some research but haven't found much info on wether it has to b in the bloodstream or not to poison the blood, I'm shure it doesn't have to be to kill him. As silver inflicted wounds do not heal nearly as fast as normal wounds and therefore they die easily from that.
I think they could avert the poisoning, if they have an organised society they have probably found an antidote while if there isn't a werewolf society the werewolf might just sleep it off, or revert back to human form, then again maybe he's just doomed.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 20th 2009 21:13
yh thats a good point coz it would b just like a normal wound coz it wouldnt heal, so that would make it fatal, and yh if they reverted to being human i dont think it would help as they would b just as vunerable.

Comment by Daniella

June 23rd 2009 09:33
Hi! I am going to jump into this debate by adding my two cents and then disappearing into the night. Werewolves are superior to vampires. Sorry if this has already been addressed before I have not read all of the comments but I have read many of them. But my personal opinion is that vampires are sexy but not sexual. And what better way to judge a fictional character than by which one could make us more satisfied?

Werewolves are creatures that exude sexuality. Because they are animals. Sure they are some crazy hybrid of a human and an animal, but they would surely have the urges of any other animal, and this is why I find them to be far more intriguing. Vampires will seduce you because they want to drink your blood, but I have a fantasy that a werewolf would ravish a sexy lady and ravish her good! Then again, maybe I am the only one looking at it from this angle. I hope the Twilighters do not jump me for this stance. But if I had to choose which one of these creatures to be attacked by I would choose the one capable of giving me a little somethin somethin before I die! Unrelated topic, I really love this blog. Kudos to the author I am lucky to have happened upon it. Now I think I shall wander out into the woods and see what debauchery I can become involved with. but if I am being totally truthful I am going to read more posts on this blog. That may be the equivalent of running through the woods on a moonlit night I think.

Daniellita la verdad. Recognize.

Comment by Prophet of Death

June 23rd 2009 12:24
I think in all this it has wavered too far into the personal opinion of people, and we should realy look back into the ancient folklore.

they state that vampires were selfish beings sought on drinking womens blood and getting as many slaves as one could possibly imagine. They were definatly sexualy apealing so to atract these women, it never states anything sexual as far as i know,

werewolves on the other hand were just normal people, who would come the full moon, transform into a mindless thoughtless monster, with no ability to tell loved ones from anyone else and just thought of everyone as food.

So to counteract Daniella's post i would have to say, if u are looking for a good "ravish" you would definately not want to meet a werewolf since his instinct to kill is far greater than his sexual instincts and he would kill you before "ravishing" you.

Therefore i am going to have to go with the vampire, although he is an outcast to society to the extent that he is not like you and me, the mindles violence at full moon is not something i'd like.

P.S i am no longer going by the name LOL TWILIGHT!

Comment by Emerald_Vamp

June 23rd 2009 18:13
I'm gonna jump in this debate...
I totally Agree with 'Prophet of Death', Vamps rule, Werewolves Drool, Lol.

Werewolves have no control over who they attack or 'ravish' except their pack. They may not be all Bloodthirsty, and 'let me find anyone so I can eat 'em' but anyone who smells like a stranger there gonna see 'em as a threat. They will stick with their pack (if they have one), and go hunting, (not Necessarily humans.)

Also originally Werewolves were Vampire's Protectors during the day, so they rebeled and Betrayed the Vamps, so that makes they Untrustworthy and Backstabbers!

Comment by Wülf

June 23rd 2009 18:25
Emerald_Vamp, u got that from underworld didn't u?
Could we please set some source rules over here?
I'm getting tired off ppl quoting single sources as absolute truths. (btw I was previously 'not twilight please'). But I'll react to this one anyway, just this once. You say werewolfs used to be the daylight protectors, now tell me, was that by their own choice or was this, as I suspect, slavery? And if they are so backstabbing, y do they not kill eachother?
And do not forget vampires once hungry is much more beastial then any werewolf could ever be.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 23rd 2009 21:03
Wülf to be fair i have actually read a variety of books where werewolves are the daylight protecters howeva i do not entirely agree wiv Emerald_Vamp.

yes werewolves may or may not ave being the vampire's daylight guards but they were slaves and were forced 2 do this buy elder vampires who were powerful but they rebelled which means they ave the strength to fight bk.

also werewolves r nt backstabbers and r loyal to one another more so than vampires and humans as they will remain loyal to the pack unless the 'leader' is uncapable.

vampires r the really backstabbers as they r constantely plotting and betraying one another to seize power and they only care about themselves and blood.

and bk 2 Emerald_Vamp orginal point, even tho they may percieve strangers as threats they may not actually attack them. adnd this is also a great survival tactic as they will gather their pack and attack any threats which will harm them.

Prophet of Death, yes u could look at it that way but wot about a different point of view. how abuot modern tales of vampires and werewolves and the supernatural. some of these claim that werewolves can change at will and remain in full control wen if wolf form. this means they can act however they please and can b 'sexual' if hey want 2.

and another point, ppl say werewolves r savage and bestial but at least in a pack there is some sort of order so they rnt entirely savage and mindless, as they keep a quite sophisticated order and they ave certain pack rules to keep themselves in place but vampires have no rules. they r loners and r immortal which makes them arrogant and they believe they r more important than every1 else. this makes them more savage coz they dont ave an order, just please urself.

and if any1 wants a more private 1 on 1 discussion my email is seagreenslime@yahoo.co.uk.

ps. werewolves r the best

Comment by Daniella

June 23rd 2009 21:54
I do not doubt for one second that werewolves have all of the bloodlust that vampires do. I just think that there has been an over emphasis on the allure of vamps when in reality most writings on the topic present them as asexual. The are sexy no question but it is the same way that an angler fish dangles a tasty looking treat to lure in prey and then bammo, they eat you. Werewolves on the other hand seem to be more primal. I am sure that you would be unlikely to emerge unscathed from a werewolf encounter either, but in my imagination you would at least stand a chance of seducing them. The myth of the vampire has evolved into one of sex and seduction but where is our story of lustful wolves? That is what I want to see.

Daniellita la verdad.

Comment by Bryn

June 24th 2009 00:01
"lustful wolves" .... exactly!

Comment by The Kiasyd

June 24th 2009 10:49
im albino and i cant go out in sunlight so im nocturnel im just about to go to bed and its 11:44am wich for me is very late and i lick my wounds, so thts to vamp bad sides out the way i dont mind not seeing the sun and im sure being unded isnt that bad, whether werewolves are just over grown dogs thatget angry when they turn really wat upside is there.

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 24th 2009 15:54
albino doesnt mean u cant go out into the sun and vamps consequence is ultimate death. and werewolves dont always transform wen they get pissed off, they can change at will or only at full moon and the upside is that u r strong, ave a pack who r friends and wont betray u, u always ave a place 2 go and u can embrace ur animal instincts.

Comment by Emerald_Vamp

June 24th 2009 16:26
Wülf , Actually, No I didn't get the Day Protectors from Underworld, I read a lot, call me a geek I don't care and it's in a lot of my books. And if Werewolves are so high and mighty, how did the Vamps 'Enslave' them in the first place?

And 'dyer_werecreatures' all Vamps aren't loners, they have a Hierachy just like Werewolves. You have a Big Vamp Boss which is the equivalent of an Alpha Werewolf. And in defence of all 'Backstabbing' Vamps, let me ask you this, If you had to live Forever and your 'Boss' was a complete Prick, would you sit back for eternity and do what they say? Didn't think so...

And the 'Sexy Vamps' is a survival tactic, coz I don't think many people would let a vamp suck their blood so the Vamp makes it Pleasurable to survive.

And if a Werewolf eats you, your Toast coz it'll actually eat you, but if a Vamp eats you, you may survive coz it'll only drink your blood.

And Wülf, lets just remember there is no REAL evidence of Vamps and Werewolves, so NONE of this is an 'ABSOLUTE TRUTH' And it doesn't matter what you 'Suspect' because you have no proof and EVERYONE on this site is going by what theyv'e read, or heard, ect.

But just Remember, Half the World is in Night...

Comment by Wülf

June 24th 2009 17:27
You are right Emerald_Vamp, and I am sorry for my previous behavior.
Could you recomend me some books about werewolves?

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 24th 2009 17:57
to combat Emerald_Vamp's post:

u say vampires ave a hierachy but they dont. it may appear like a pyramid scheme were each vampire has minions, and each of them minions ave other minions but for a real hierachy u need trust. werewolves ave a successful hierachy coz they look out 4 wach other and trust each other but vampires r 2 busy plotting and schemeing against there 'bosses' that there is no trust and therefore a valid hierachy.

Emerald_vamp u say that vampires kill their 'bosses' coz they r pricks but infact most vampires r pricks coz they r immortal and arrogant as tbhey believe they r more important than everyone an everything else. the main reason they dont 'sit back for eternity' and betray their 'bosses' is coz they r all selfish and want that power 4 themselves, not coz they dislike them, but coz they want they want 2 kill and steal that authority and power.

and u say that a werewolf will defo eat u and kill u but how do u think ppl r turned? they survive, thats how, so they cant totally eat, devour and murder every1 or else there wouldnt b and werewolves.

and 2 b truthful, a vampire has just as much if not more chance of killing due to 'eating u'. wen a werewolf attacks u, u get turned into a werewolf 'basically' and the same goes 4 vampires and if werewolves and vampires attack the same number of ppl, they shuold effectively 'turn' the same amount roughly and this will increase their numbers. this is good 4 werewolves as they see numbers and strength coz they hunt in packs, so the more the merrier and stronger they r however the same isnt 4 vampires. they see numbers as threats, the more vampires there r, the more chance of sum1 betraying u and stealing ur power. so based on this information, vampires r more likely 2 kill u as turning u would not benefit them but it would benefit werewolves so this makes them less likely to 'eat' u and kill u.

Comment by Royale

June 24th 2009 18:20
werewolves wear plaid so there ......

Comment by Bryn

June 25th 2009 01:03
I think I have some plaid somewhere in my wardrobe ...

Comment by Royale

June 25th 2009 16:03
also with respect to lustful wolves ...you all know that wolves in the wild are strictly monogamous and mate for life...Wolves in the wild only mate at given times of the year ......Dont know much about Bats but most rodents mate often and randomly
If cinematic and literary portrayals of the two species are correct vampires can drink almost any type of blood to survive...while most werewolves dont have enough presence of mind to be picky

Comment by Emerald_Vamp

June 27th 2009 14:14
Yeah sure Wülf, I like the Kitty Norville Series by Carrie Vaughn, she is a Werewolf and a Radio Talk Show Host. It is really good and she has to deal with her pack and it shows her life and how hard it is being the 'new one' at the bottom of the food chain...

Anyway, Royale how are Vamps like bats and Rodents, yeah sure you get Vampire Bats but they are Prey and Vamps are Predators...

Comment by dyer_werecreatures

June 27th 2009 18:37
hi yh i agree, that kitty norville book is really gd and i like how she works her way 2 the top, and anyway another gd book is Mercy Thompson by Patricia Briggs.

and royale, just coz wolves 'are strictly monogamous and mate for life' that doesnt mean they dont get alot of sex coz it is up 2 the actual person and there character, if they were a lustful person when they were human then they will still remain lustful and if they had the 'presence of mind' b4 then they will still have it wont they? and vampires dont enjoy human pleasures such as sex so that argument is void anyway.


Comment by Royale

June 27th 2009 21:37
real vampire bats are a kind of rodent I am pretty sure...Vampire bats actually do suck blood from animals thats partly where the legend came from ...many bats eat insects which make them predators .......People are people thats much is correct.....but the argument presented was that the nature of the wolf somehow translates to the person who becomes a werewolf via some sort of sympathetic magic I was simply countering that and if you go strictly by lupine biology I beleve that still applys. You could argue that people would still be the people they were but power changes everybody.
I dissagree with the idea that vamps do not enjoy the same things people do...Depending on the cinematic and literary examples you observe they enjoy all the things people do, good food, good wine, and I bet good roll in the hay wether with another vamp or a human...
ASs to how vamps are like bats recent movies that show some transformation to a non human state are very bat like ie Van Helsing, underworld..so you could argue that they although they are not lycanthropes the bats was the totem used to bind their power to this plane....If vamps are just people with extas the argument that they are just as lustful as weres holds up even more

Comment by Gthec9909

June 28th 2009 13:05
Vampires, because vampires are also like, super human strong. like superman. that's what the mortal instruments has taught me, any way. and vampires are way cooler.

Comment by Royale

June 28th 2009 14:09
)Plus the more I think about it I find it hard to imagine werewolves playing really cool music...I imagine them as more along the country and western line or maybe even disco...Remember the really cool soudntrack on Queen of the damned that and the two fight scenes were the best part of the movie

Comment by twilight freak

June 29th 2009 01:50
I like all the coments but i still say that vamps rule and i was a vamp lover before twilight i just realy like twilight

Comment by twilight freak

June 29th 2009 01:51
I like all the coments but i still say that vamps rule and i was a vamp lover before twilight i just realy like twilight

Comment by twilight freak

June 29th 2009 01:51
I like all the coments but i still say that vamps rule and i was a vamp lover before twilight i just realy like twilight

Comment by twilight freak

June 29th 2009 01:51
I like all the coments but i still say that vamps rule and i was a vamp lover before twilight i just realy like twilight

Comment by twilight freak

June 29th 2009 01:51
I like all the coments but i still say that vamps rule and i was a vamp lover before twilight i just realy like twilight

Comment by twilight freak

June 29th 2009 01:51