After.Life
July 16th 2010 04:51
What a preposterous movie this was! After.Life (2009), starring Christina Ricci, Liam Neeson, and Justin Long, is the debut feature from an ex-pat Polish woman named Agnieszka Wojtowicz-Vosloo who studied film at NYU and made an acclaimed 30-minute short called Pâté in 2001. Apparently her influences were Roman Polanski and Dario Argento, but I failed to see any aspects or elements from either of those two masterful directors. Instead I saw a decidedly dull and lifeless “existential” account of one woman’s nightmarish journey through the limbo of consciousness at the hands of a deranged mortician.
Anna (Christina Ricci) is a middle school teacher trapped within her own manifested realm of boredom and frustration. Her fiancé, Paul (Justin Long), means well, but puts his foot in his mouth, and fails to fathom his lover’s malaise. At a dinner date Paul breaks news of a job offer in another city, which swiftly upsets Anna, and before Paul can rectify the situation Anna has stormed off and is driving dangerously fast on the rain-swept highway. Tragedy strikes.
Anna awakes on a mortuary slab with a fatal gash on her forehead and the mortician, Eliot (Liam Neeson) staring down at her about to administer a funereal injection. But Anna isn’t dead, well, so she claims. She looks pretty alive, but Eliot begs to differ, yet doesn’t really justify the reasons. He only tries to console Anna, telling her that everything is how it should be. And so the rest of this far-flung tale of unreasoning beyond the fleshy fabric of mortality unfolds.
Technically After.Life isn’t badly made, but the screenplay, by the director and Paul Vosloo (no doubt her husband) and Jakub Korolczuk is tedious and risible, like the worst kinds of television movies). The CGI special effects are unconvincing, apart from two prosthetic stitch jobs (Anna’s head, and later a dead man’s lips). Are those two sequences what resulted in the absurd Australian “R18 – contains high impact horror violence” censor’s warning?! I can’t for the life of me work out why this movie would need such a strong rating. Is it the movie’s macabre and morbid content? It’s hardly disturbing. Although dealing with a different side of death and the mortician’s prerogative, the Canadian movie Kissed (1996) was more provocative, subversive and memorable.
So Anna tries to re-connect with Paul, whilst a young boy, Jack (Chandler Canterbury) connects with Eliot, and it becomes apparent Eliot, and probably the lad, has a “gift”. But more importantly, Eliot has an agenda, a mission. Not from God, certainly not. It seems more likely the Devil’s work is guiding his latex-gloved hands. Eliot certainly possesses a lot of conviction, and a quiet hatred courses through his psyche; for all those wretched humans who eat and shit with nothing but disdain and emptiness in their hearts. He’s doing them a favour; ridding them of their worthless existence, clogging up the planet’s surface, when they’d be better off feeding the worms six feet under.
I’m probably making this movie sound more interesting than it is. Despite a woman at the helm (a rare thing in the horror genre), After.Life fails to capture anything truly remarkable, apart from encouraging Christina Ricci to be naked for much of the time, which makes sense I guess, since Anna spends most of her time on the mortuary slab. Christina is always watchable, but her acting only barely has a pulse. Justin Long delivers a way-below-par performance, making his work in Jeepers Creepers (2004) and Drag Me to Hell (2009) look positively laudable. As for Liam Neeson … what is going on with his career?! He’s becoming the next Michael Caine. It should’ve been him on the slab not Christina! Alfred Molina was originally cast as Eliot, and a creepier, more effective choice that would’ve been (and Kate Bosworth was originally cast as Anna, but was replaced by Ricci).
Finally, while the period (dot) in the middle of the title obviously alludes to the limbo period (time and space) Anna finds herself trapped in, more than likely the “clever” grammar is designed to differentiate this movie from others with the same title. As cold and compelling as a hospital floor, After.Life is for Christina Ricci completists only (and at the risk of sounding sexist, for those who felt ripped off with Black Snake Moan’s lack of nudity).
Here's the trailer:
Anna (Christina Ricci) is a middle school teacher trapped within her own manifested realm of boredom and frustration. Her fiancé, Paul (Justin Long), means well, but puts his foot in his mouth, and fails to fathom his lover’s malaise. At a dinner date Paul breaks news of a job offer in another city, which swiftly upsets Anna, and before Paul can rectify the situation Anna has stormed off and is driving dangerously fast on the rain-swept highway. Tragedy strikes.
Anna awakes on a mortuary slab with a fatal gash on her forehead and the mortician, Eliot (Liam Neeson) staring down at her about to administer a funereal injection. But Anna isn’t dead, well, so she claims. She looks pretty alive, but Eliot begs to differ, yet doesn’t really justify the reasons. He only tries to console Anna, telling her that everything is how it should be. And so the rest of this far-flung tale of unreasoning beyond the fleshy fabric of mortality unfolds.
Technically After.Life isn’t badly made, but the screenplay, by the director and Paul Vosloo (no doubt her husband) and Jakub Korolczuk is tedious and risible, like the worst kinds of television movies). The CGI special effects are unconvincing, apart from two prosthetic stitch jobs (Anna’s head, and later a dead man’s lips). Are those two sequences what resulted in the absurd Australian “R18 – contains high impact horror violence” censor’s warning?! I can’t for the life of me work out why this movie would need such a strong rating. Is it the movie’s macabre and morbid content? It’s hardly disturbing. Although dealing with a different side of death and the mortician’s prerogative, the Canadian movie Kissed (1996) was more provocative, subversive and memorable.
So Anna tries to re-connect with Paul, whilst a young boy, Jack (Chandler Canterbury) connects with Eliot, and it becomes apparent Eliot, and probably the lad, has a “gift”. But more importantly, Eliot has an agenda, a mission. Not from God, certainly not. It seems more likely the Devil’s work is guiding his latex-gloved hands. Eliot certainly possesses a lot of conviction, and a quiet hatred courses through his psyche; for all those wretched humans who eat and shit with nothing but disdain and emptiness in their hearts. He’s doing them a favour; ridding them of their worthless existence, clogging up the planet’s surface, when they’d be better off feeding the worms six feet under.
I’m probably making this movie sound more interesting than it is. Despite a woman at the helm (a rare thing in the horror genre), After.Life fails to capture anything truly remarkable, apart from encouraging Christina Ricci to be naked for much of the time, which makes sense I guess, since Anna spends most of her time on the mortuary slab. Christina is always watchable, but her acting only barely has a pulse. Justin Long delivers a way-below-par performance, making his work in Jeepers Creepers (2004) and Drag Me to Hell (2009) look positively laudable. As for Liam Neeson … what is going on with his career?! He’s becoming the next Michael Caine. It should’ve been him on the slab not Christina! Alfred Molina was originally cast as Eliot, and a creepier, more effective choice that would’ve been (and Kate Bosworth was originally cast as Anna, but was replaced by Ricci).
Finally, while the period (dot) in the middle of the title obviously alludes to the limbo period (time and space) Anna finds herself trapped in, more than likely the “clever” grammar is designed to differentiate this movie from others with the same title. As cold and compelling as a hospital floor, After.Life is for Christina Ricci completists only (and at the risk of sounding sexist, for those who felt ripped off with Black Snake Moan’s lack of nudity).
Here's the trailer:
| 172 |
| Vote |
subscribe to this blog





























Comment by David O'Connell
Screen Fanatic
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by Jason King
Sydney Table
Salty Popcorn
Total Randomness
Cool review of it
Comment by Bryn
Horrorphile
Comment by JohnDoe
Film & TV on DVD
I do love me some Ricci action but this one sounds pathetic.
never been huge on Neeson, though there are exceptions to the rule. As for Long, he has potential that has not been mined yet.