Halloween II
October 31st 2007 05:33
“More of the night He came home!”
Okay, it’s not anywhere near as unnerving or frightening as John Carpenter’s original, but this sequel should’ve been titled more precisely Halloween Part Two as it continues straight on from where the first one finishes, in fact the movie even starts with the last moments of the first movie and then takes the baton and runs with it. It stumbles and falls a few times, but that’s to be expected, it wasn’t directed by Carpenter it was directed by debut feature director Rick Rosenthal.
Halloween II (1981) is literally more of the night Michael Myers came home to Haddenfield. The movie takes place over the rest of Halloween night but is set almost entirely in a hospital. Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis), having been badly wounded by Myers in the first movie, is at the local hospital while Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasance) and Sheriff Brackett (Charles Cyphers), who’s pretty daughter Annie died at the hands of the boogeyman, are out and about trying to track down this phantom homicidal maniac.
A young man inadvertently alerts Myers to Laurie’s whereabouts, and thus the tension is racketed up ten fold as Myers begins murdering the few hospital nurses and interns on nightshift (yes, oddly convenient for the purposes of the movie that the Haddonfield hospital is so vacant on Halloween night).
Meanwhile Marion Chambers (Nancy Stephens) the asylum nurse who was meant to be aiding Michael Myers transference to a maximum security prison at the beginning of the first movie informs Dr. Loomis that Michael is after Laurie Strode because she is his sister, born two years before he was committed. Myers is closing in on Laurie. Will Dr. Loomis get to her in time to save her from the boogeyman incarnate? Will Michael Myers complete his deranged mission of evil? What can possibly stop this human killing machine?!
Director Rosenthal’s helming of the sequel isn’t terrible, but it lacks the fluidity or narrative cohesion of Carpenter’s original. If anything the movie is more subdued in mood and atmosphere and more pedestrian in its use of camerawork and lighting. However, these failings aside the movie is much better than most sequels, if anything because it continues on with the same thread and intent as the first movie, and Halloween's murderous legacy has enough power to imbue Halloween II with the momentum to follow through. It’s more graphic in its depiction of violence, and in this respect it is similar to the multitude of slasher movies which were already hitting cinemas. Sean Cunningham’s Friday the 13th (1980) had opened the floodgates and so Carpenter, who wrote and produced Halloween II, was forced to play the same game other wise risk being slammed by gore hungry horror fans.
But the characters, outside of the two central ones, are nowhere near as convincing or memorable. The hospital staff are all cardboard cutouts. But their deaths are juicy, especially the one where Myers rams a scalpel into the back of a nurse and with his own sheer strength lifts her up off the ground (okay, so that’s hokey as hell, but it looks great).
Of course I have to mention the infamous Halloween score again, because this is integral to the movie’s atmosphere. Carpenter alters the themes slightly, but the central elements are still as powerful as ever and damn scary too … always, every time.
Halloween II, despite its shortcomings, is best watched back to back with the first movie. While the next film Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982) has nothing to do with anything from the first two films except for the Halloween setting, and is okay viewed on its own (I’ll review it at a later date), the other five sequels are utter shite. I don’t care what anyone else says Halloween and Halloween II is where the story starts and ends.
Here is the original theatrical trailer:
There was an alternate ending made for the television version which provided viewers with a more upbeat consequence for the character of paramedic Jimmy (Lance Guest). Warning: contains spoilers:
Okay, it’s not anywhere near as unnerving or frightening as John Carpenter’s original, but this sequel should’ve been titled more precisely Halloween Part Two as it continues straight on from where the first one finishes, in fact the movie even starts with the last moments of the first movie and then takes the baton and runs with it. It stumbles and falls a few times, but that’s to be expected, it wasn’t directed by Carpenter it was directed by debut feature director Rick Rosenthal.
Halloween II (1981) is literally more of the night Michael Myers came home to Haddenfield. The movie takes place over the rest of Halloween night but is set almost entirely in a hospital. Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis), having been badly wounded by Myers in the first movie, is at the local hospital while Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasance) and Sheriff Brackett (Charles Cyphers), who’s pretty daughter Annie died at the hands of the boogeyman, are out and about trying to track down this phantom homicidal maniac.
A young man inadvertently alerts Myers to Laurie’s whereabouts, and thus the tension is racketed up ten fold as Myers begins murdering the few hospital nurses and interns on nightshift (yes, oddly convenient for the purposes of the movie that the Haddonfield hospital is so vacant on Halloween night).
Meanwhile Marion Chambers (Nancy Stephens) the asylum nurse who was meant to be aiding Michael Myers transference to a maximum security prison at the beginning of the first movie informs Dr. Loomis that Michael is after Laurie Strode because she is his sister, born two years before he was committed. Myers is closing in on Laurie. Will Dr. Loomis get to her in time to save her from the boogeyman incarnate? Will Michael Myers complete his deranged mission of evil? What can possibly stop this human killing machine?!
Director Rosenthal’s helming of the sequel isn’t terrible, but it lacks the fluidity or narrative cohesion of Carpenter’s original. If anything the movie is more subdued in mood and atmosphere and more pedestrian in its use of camerawork and lighting. However, these failings aside the movie is much better than most sequels, if anything because it continues on with the same thread and intent as the first movie, and Halloween's murderous legacy has enough power to imbue Halloween II with the momentum to follow through. It’s more graphic in its depiction of violence, and in this respect it is similar to the multitude of slasher movies which were already hitting cinemas. Sean Cunningham’s Friday the 13th (1980) had opened the floodgates and so Carpenter, who wrote and produced Halloween II, was forced to play the same game other wise risk being slammed by gore hungry horror fans.
But the characters, outside of the two central ones, are nowhere near as convincing or memorable. The hospital staff are all cardboard cutouts. But their deaths are juicy, especially the one where Myers rams a scalpel into the back of a nurse and with his own sheer strength lifts her up off the ground (okay, so that’s hokey as hell, but it looks great).
Of course I have to mention the infamous Halloween score again, because this is integral to the movie’s atmosphere. Carpenter alters the themes slightly, but the central elements are still as powerful as ever and damn scary too … always, every time.
Halloween II, despite its shortcomings, is best watched back to back with the first movie. While the next film Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982) has nothing to do with anything from the first two films except for the Halloween setting, and is okay viewed on its own (I’ll review it at a later date), the other five sequels are utter shite. I don’t care what anyone else says Halloween and Halloween II is where the story starts and ends.
Here is the original theatrical trailer:
There was an alternate ending made for the television version which provided viewers with a more upbeat consequence for the character of paramedic Jimmy (Lance Guest). Warning: contains spoilers:
| 50 |
| Vote |




















Comments (9)
Add Comments
























Read More














