Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login
 
“Monsters do exist; in us and among us. They walk in our shadow. They can prey on us more as we fear them less. We should know. We created them.” --- George A. Romero

Horrorphile - August 2006

NOVELS I'd like to see as MOVIES

August 31st 2006 02:12
… or Books Already Filmed That Could Be Much Better.

Everyone has their favourite movie adaptation of a novel. And everyone has a short list of novels that haven’t been made into films which they’d love to see put into production.

Here are six novels (and one short story) which I hope someday get made/remade into kick-ass horror flicks (and the directors who should do them). I’ve included a couple of novels which have already been made into movies (several times), and one which was made as a mini-series.

1. House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski
This blew my mind when I read it a couple of years ago. It is the ultimate haunted house story. An existential time and space non-linear nightmare about a family who discover their house is a portal into Darkness. On one hand this is an un-filmable novel, as much of its supernatural power lies in the structure of its printed words (if you’ve read the novel you’ll know exactly what I mean). But if it somehow could get made with all of its artistic license and boundary pushing intact, it would be an extraordinary experience. The only person I can think of you might be able to tackle the job would be David Lynch.

2. Once … by James Herbert
I read some of this British author’s earlier works when I was an adolescent, such as The Rats and The Dark. Then a year or so ago I came across this very adult-phantasmagorical tale of faeries and demons, and it described some of the most vivid and spellbinding images I had read in years. It successfully bridged and merged the worlds of fantasy and horror with a fresh perspective. Not only was it very erotic (more raunchy and primal than Ann Rice), but it balanced sex with death very compellingly. And boy, there were some exceptionally nightmarish sequences crying out to be filmed! The director for this would need to be Dario Argento.

3. Survivor Type by Stephen King
In his compendium of short stories called Skeleton Crew there is a deliciously macabre and outrageous tale of a surgeon marooned on an island armed only with a big stash of morphine. After breaking his ankle trying to catch a seagull to eat he is forced to … well … eat himself. Narrated in diary form, the surgeon uses his skills (and large doses of the painkiller) to slowly and steadily devour his extremities, until he eventually starts to slide into delirium. I’m not sure it would make for particularly palatable entertainment for the masses, but in the right hands, someone like the late Joe D’Amato, unafraid of implausibility, someone who would embrace the gory perversion.

4. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
Don’t get me wrong, the James Whale version from 1931 is a great flick, but it is Olde World Hollywood. Disregard the Hammer Film productions, as cheesy fun as they are. And please forget the Kenneth Branagh monstrosity. There are numerous other variations, but the person who apparently was going to produce his own re-envisioning years ago was David Cronenberg. Without a doubt, this classic tale of body-horror and loss of control is right up Cronenberg’s alley. It didn’t eventuate and I think now the moment may have passed for him, yet I still wait in hope.

5. Dracula by Bram Stoker
This is another novel with countless film adaptations, none of them very good. Even Coppola’s so-called faithful version wasn’t really the novel. It was closer than most, but it lacked any genuine terror or suspense, and it sported some terrible casting choices (Keanu Reeves?? Winona Ryder?? Cary Elwes??) The novel has a spare poetry with many striking, haunting, even terrifying images and sequences (Harker watching in horrific disbelief as the Count flaps his way down the side of the castle wall in the dead of night still gives me the chills). F. W. Murnau’s loose adaptation, Nosferatu (1922), managed to capture some of the ghostly surrealism, but no one has done the novel ultimate justice. I’m thinking Jane Campion, to add a sensual, feminine, yet Gothic touch to this tale of the zip-less fuck.

6. The Stand by Stephen King
I loved all of King’s early novels, and a few of them have actually been filmed rather well such as Carrie (1976), Salem’s Lot (1979) and The Dead Zone (1983). However it was this epic tale of the apocalypse which lingered long in my mind. I waited patiently for it to reach the big screen. And it was meant to for many years by none other than maestro zombie guy, George A. Romero, except it never came to fruition. For years King and Romero struggled with the very weighty manuscript. It eventually got made as a lame TV mini-series. Perhaps if Land of the Dead (2005) had faired better, Romero might have had the balls to re-tackle The Stand. In this age of terrorism and bird-flu, it would make for powerful horror cinema!

7. The Vampire Lestat by Ann Rice
I read the first two novels in Rice’s ongoing Vampire Chronicles several years before the first novel Interview with the Vampire (1994) was made. At the time (circa mid-80s) Rice made a statement as to whom she’d like to see cast in the central roles; Eric Roberts (Julia’s chisel-featured older brother) as Louis and Rutger Hauer (fresh from Blade Runner, 1982) as Lestat. Now that would have been sensational, but it never happened. Instead we eventually got a watered-down adaptation with two anaemic and limp performances from Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise. Not only that, but the screenwriters included many elements from the second novel The Vampire Lestat, but lost the plot and emphasis along the way. Lestat is probably the best novel of the whole series and could, with the right production values, savvy understanding of vampire mythology, and spot-on casting be the ultimate vampire movie (boy do we need one! The Blade films are just too cartoony). Some of the tales within the novel of Lestat are nothing less than astonishing storytelling. Martin Scorsese should direct.
81
Vote
   


I, ZOMBIE

August 30th 2006 02:23
If there’s a particular favourite “monster” in horror movies it’d probably the flesh-tearing, gut-munching, cannibalistic undead. Yes, ye ole zombieeeee!!!!!

Sure, I dig vampires, I’m particularly fond of werewolves, and I admire alien beasts, but for sheer gruesome chutzpah you gotta love the living lead.

The zombie was first introduced in somewhat differing incarnations to what we are familiar with these days. Jacques Tourneur’s I Walked With a Zombie (1943) uses the original Caribbean superstitions of the risen dead drifting amidst nefarious voodoo activities.

But in 1968 a young ambitious Pittsburgh filmmaker came up with a brilliant concept. George Romero’s landmark midnight movie of the world being terrorized by scores of the undead changed everything. Arguably it was the birth of the modern horror film. It was super low-budget, in black and white, and bravely ended with a chillingly downbeat, and for the time, shocking conclusion. It was called Night of the Living Dead.



Although the word zombie is never mentioned, Romero’s shuffling, decaying, sometimes naked, dead roaming the countryside searching for warm flesh to chow down on, became the ne-plus-ultra of what the living dead should look and act like (although in recent years two films have challenged this by having the zombies run, instead of walk; 28 Days Later (2002) and the remake of Dawn of the Dead (2004)).

A Spanish flick known as Let Sleeping Corpses Lie (1974) or The Living Dead at the Manchester Morgue created a very atmospheric take on the genre, but it was Romero again at the end of the decade who created a sequel to his original nightmare which became possibly the most lauded zombie flick ever made; Dawn of the Dead (1978).



Often cited as a social satire, it’s really just a drawn-out textbook example for imaginative gore effects by one of the masters, Tom Savini. Like the first film it starts and ends with no real explanation or resolve for the dire situation at hand. And this is one of the reasons it works so well.

Romero had hoped to complete his trilogy with a no-holds-barred zombie war (military setting “trained” zombies to battle against zombies). However funding problems meant he had to scale down his original ideas. The result however is actually a sensationally good film, if perhaps a little talky. Day of the Dead (1985) is a tour-de-force of SFX makeup set-pieces and a creeping, doom-laden atmosphere. It also features the best performances of all Romero’s zombie flicks, especially Joe Pilato’s rogue, trigger-happy Captain Rhodes (“Is that food enuff faw ya?!”)

The fans got wind that Romero was planning to extend his trilogy into a quartet. And last year he finally completed the next installment, Land of the Dead (2005); however it failed to live up to expectations, despite a handful of striking and chilling sequences.

So, there’s a little flesh for thought … and I’ll be returning to this putrid sub-genre again, don’t you worry.

* the images on this page were taken from the following wikipedia pages:
Night of the Living Dead (movie poster) and Dawn of the Dead (movie poster)
They are licensed under the GNU Free Document License.
83
Vote
   


All hail the FINAL GIRL

August 28th 2006 12:57
The stalking and slashing sub-genre within the modern horror film began with Italy’s Twitch of the Death Nerve (1971) aka Bay of Blood aka Carnage. Directed with visual flair by the legendary Mario Bava and featuring a high body count, this was the original blueprint for what would eventually become known as the stalk’n’slash genre, sometimes referred to as slice’n’dice, or in its most comprehensive tag; slasher movies.

A Canadian film called Black Christmas (1974) further honed this architecture of bloodletting. Although most of the movies in this sub-genre featured quite pedestrian direction, there were definitely some standouts. Most notable is John Carpenter’s seminal “BOO!” machine Halloween (1978). This landmark horror movie was the single most successful independent film ever made (if you exclude Deep Throat (1972) which beats it hands down, but we’re not here to discuss the revenue made by sleazy grind-house … um, or are we?)



Despite being terrorized and injured, then hospitalised, Jamie Lee Curtis survives the supernatural evil of psychopath Michael Myers and the sequel, Halloween II (1981) - more of the night He came home. Curtis utilized more or less the same kind of survival techniques in The Fog (1980), Prom Night (1980) and Terror Train (1980). Curtis became the quintessential Final Girl.



So what exactly is a Final Girl, I hear you ask? She’s the heroine who’s not really a heroine. She does an awful lot of screaming. She is possibly a virgin, or at least abstains from any wanton sexual activity, although she may steal a kiss before the end credits roll. She doesn’t do drugs, but has friends who may smoke a little pot. She is smart and capable, but tends to scream a lot and can be a bit of a panic merchant. Although when push comes to shove comes to stab comes to slice and dice, our Final Girl comes up trumps. She survives. She is woman, hear her roar.

We all aspire in some way to be the Final Girl.

That is; act virtuous, beat the evil. And as we know from what the media tells us, there is a lot of evil out there.

So, some things you should take heed of if you wish to survive a slasher flick.

1. Never try to escape using a vehicle. Inevitably they won’t start. The keys will be in the ignition, but the engine won’t turn over. It’s better just to run. Run like hell.
2. Stay away from windows (psychos love to use them), bathrooms (read: shower stalls and bath curtains), toilet cubicles (relieving oneself is tantamount to treason!).
3. Practical jokers are doomed. Do not involve yourself with people playing pranks. They will get there’s, most certainly.
4. Avoid – at all costs – any partaking of drugs, listening to pop music, engaging in pre-marital, extra-marital, or, in fact, any kind of sex. These indulgences will lead directly to being slashed, sliced, diced, burnt, broken, dismembered, disemboweled, etc, ad nauseum.
5. Steer well clear of any notion of entertaining on any of those popular calendar dates such as Valentine ’s Day, April Fools Day, All Hallow’s Eve, or on superstitious dates.


* the images on this page was taken from the following Wikipedia page:
Halloween (original movie poster and Jamie Lee Curtis as Laurie Strode in Halloween)
It is licensed under the GNU Free License.
75
Vote
   


WITCH in the machine

August 25th 2006 00:35
Italy’s legendary maestro of the macabre, Dario Argento, is in the midst of something special. More then 25 years since the release of his fiery tale of witches in New York and Rome he’s finally at the helm making the final third part to his cult trilogy known affectionately as “The Three Mothers”.

After many years of fans repeatedly asking the same question, “When is Argento going to bring it home?!” he’s finally begun to hammer the final nails into the coffin. The Mother of Tears is in production


[ Click here to read more ]
68
Vote
   


The dying art of EXPRESSIONISM

August 22nd 2006 22:56
Two primary elements within the visual grammar of horror movies is the use of light and shadow, allowing us when to see, and when not to see. They create a mood and ephemeral texture in which to paint our fears.

There are the things that go bump in the night, like the Blair Witch. And there are the ghastly spectres of the daytime, such as the serial killer Jigsaw


[ Click here to read more ]
63
Vote
   


Eye of the MONSTER

August 21st 2006 00:41
Horror movies deal with some kind of “monster” and the danger and dread it invokes. As well as all the death it invariably delivers.

The “monster” comes in all shapes and sizes. Sometimes the “monster” is not even seen, only suggested. And this can be even more terrifying. But only occasionally does a screenwriter pull this trick off, because more often than not the audience will demand the money shot (in horror movies we’d probably call this the monster shot


[ Click here to read more ]
45
Vote
   


Silent Hill

August 18th 2006 00:19
I saw Silent Hill tonight. Not sure about this one. Tries too hard. One of those, lets-throw-several-genres-tog ether-and-try-and-be-really-c lever kinda movies.

Mostly it’s a horror flick. Albeit a more surreal and intense one that normally comes out of Hollywood. This is a co-production with probably too many chefs in the kitchen, all stirring at the computer generated imagery and narrative atmosphere


[ Click here to read more ]
69
Vote
   


Horror - the BLACK SHEEP of cinema

August 16th 2006 22:32
What is the horror movie genre really about?

Well, for starters, just to whet your bloodlust, it’s about scaring the bejesus out of you. But more specifically, it’s about confronting your fears within the confines of a safe environment, like a cinema, or your living room, or if you are in for the “grind house” experience, then a dodgy drive-in (but you gotta scout around for those


[ Click here to read more ]
87
Vote
   


More Posts
14 Posts
23 Posts
23 Posts
444 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
Moderated by Bryn
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]