Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
"I always do an all-night horror marathon on Saturdays where we start at seven and go until five in the morning." --- Quentin Tarantino ::::::::::: MY CRITERIA FOR DISCUSSION ENCOMPASSES THE HORROR GENRE AND BEYOND, SO I USE THE TERM "NIGHTMARE MOVIES". SPOILERS CAN OCCUR WITH OR WITHOUT WARNING. READ AT YOUR OWN RISK.

13

August 24th 2011 07:53
13 movie poster
It’s bad enough (as a rule of thumb) when Hollywood remakes a great movie, even a solid one. But it’s insult to injury when a fat cheque to remake his or her own movie lures the original director. It happened with Dutch director Goerge Sluizer and The Vanishing (1988), an awesomely chilling psychological nightmare thriller that Sluizer then remade in English primarily for American audiences, and worse still was that he compromised the take-no-prisoners ending that made his original movie so powerful and effective. Well, it’s happened again, this time with Georgian-French director Gela Babluani and his lean, mean killing machine 13 (Tzameti), originally released in 2005, now remade in colour and in English and aimed squarely at Hollywood agents.
13 Sam Riley
Sam Riley as Vince
The movie remains the same (unlike The Vanishing remake), which might sound like a plus factor, but actually works against it. The frayed and downbeat ending which punctuated the original 13 with a rounded calibre of nihilism doesn’t fit with this Hollywood-style version. Instead it feels like we’re missing a further ten minutes or so. It’s like the movie’s been shorn of a fittingly intense climax. But enough about the lame ending, which wouldn’t have seemed so lame if the screenplay had been up to scratch.
13 Jason Statham, Ray Winstone
Jason Statham as Jasper, Ray Winstone as Ronald and Alan Davidson as Drizer
Gela Babluani has co-scripted with Gregory Pruss, and it sticks very closely to the original in terms of action, but additionally it contrives to tell the back-stories to several other characters that are superfluous. There isn’t enough characterisation. Period. The direction of the actors is adrift like a raft lost at sea, and there are some seriously good actors in this movie, which says a lot about Babluani dropping the actor’s ball big time. 13 boasts an impressive array of he-men, character actors, and all-round edgy and charismatic thespians. We’ve got Sam Riley in the role of naïve Vince, the electrician desperate for money to pay for the surgery and hospital bills in order to save his badly injured father. Riley dons a soft-spoken non-descript American accent, which doesn’t suit him one iota.

13 Alex Skarsgard
Alex Skarsgard as Jack
Vince foolishly decides to fill the shoes of the man whose home he was wiring. The man has overdosed, and Vince has purloined the details of an arrangement that may fetch him big money. This arrangement sees him leaving town, meeting a middleman (Alex Skarsgard), and eventually thrust into the middle of an elaborate game of death with very high stakes for those nefarious enough to gamble. It’s Russian Roulette essentially, and Vince is up against some heavyweights; Ronald (Ray Winstone) and his gambler brother Jasper (Jason Statham), Jefferson (Mickey Rourke) and his gambler Jimmy (Curtis Jackson a.k.a. 50 Cent), whilst an aging gambler, Schlondorff (Ben Gazzara), becomes very interested in Vince’s lucky streak. And rounding off the cast of A-listers is Michael Shannon as the Henry, the highly-strung game caller.

As I said, this is a killer cast. But the director has no idea how to rein them in and hone their skills. Instead each actor plays himself, or plays a caricature of a previous performance. Alex Skarsgard plays Eric North (True Blood), Ray Winstone plays Ray the thug (rage, foul mouth and all), Mickey Rourke plays Mickey the tragic broken lost soul (The Wrestler), 50 Cent plays, um, 50 Cent, poor old Ben Gazzara looks close to keeling over, Michael Shannon has probably the most thankless role of all and simply shouts and gesticulates. I wish Emmanuelle Chriqui had had a bigger role!
13 Michael Shannon
Michael Shannon as Henry
13 is shot well, with a strong mise-en-scene, and some excellent location shooting, but it’s utterly hollow. The soundtrack feels either forced, off-kilter, or plain ordinary. The title credit looks like it’s been lifted from a DVD menu (!), very odd. There’s no dramatic tension, and this is the kind of movie that should be so taut you could pluck notes off its narrative threads! I said in my review of the original movie that a remake was in pre-production, and although I didn’t agree with the idea at all, I thought they’d probably shoot in colour and up the graphic violence. Well, Babluani has opted for the colour option, but there’s no graphic violence, and that was my point of contention with the original, the poetic licence not to have much bloodshed or gore. Involve multiple players in Russian Roulette and you are going to have much blood, brain and bone all over the place. 13 remains entirely underwhelming in that crucial area.

Disregarding the excellent low-budget noir-ish original for one moment; Gela Babluani’s second 13 could have been a nightmare tour-de-force of colourful character and extreme violence; an instant cult classic. But no. Despite his formidable cast, and his skills as a visual director, Babluani fumbles with the gun and shoots himself in the foot. What a waste of talent.

Here’s the trailer:

55
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
8 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by David O'Connell

August 25th 2011 06:04
Shannon again! Like you say mate, a crying shame to assemble that cast and then waste them. The whole idea of a director being lured to America to remake their film again stinks to high heaven. Didn't the guy who made Nightwatch do it as well?

Comment by Bryn

August 25th 2011 22:22
The Night Watch/Day Watch director was lured to Hollywood, but not to remake his movies, instead he directed the Angelina Jolie vehicle Hunted.

Comment by David O'Connell

August 26th 2011 05:45
No, not that one mate - I meant the 1997 film with Ewan McGregor as a nightwatchman in a morgue. Not too bad from what I recall. Did you ever see it? Directed by Ole Bornedal who made the original 3 years earlier in Denmark.

Comment by Bryn

August 26th 2011 06:18
Ahh, yes, I know of it, and have the original in a DVD wish list of mine.

Comment by Anonymous

August 31st 2011 13:20
great review, just discovered your site. will be visiting more often now.

Comment by Bryn

August 31st 2011 23:43
Cheers Anon! Spread the Darkness!

Comment by JohnDoe

September 10th 2011 18:06
That's a shame, the original was a tight little pleasure.

Inferior Remakes, what are you gunna do?

As we have always known, its the viewers fault

Comment by Bryn

September 11th 2011 05:42
Oh dear. Funny, cos I just had a thing to say about it all in my review of Fright Night.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
4 Posts
2 Posts
5 Posts
1060 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Bryn
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]